Literature DB >> 33888235

Distal Radial Access: Consensus Report of the First Korea-Europe Transradial Intervention Meeting.

Gregory A Sgueglia1, Bong-Ki Lee2, Byung-Ryul Cho2, Avtandil Babunashvili3, Jin Bae Lee4, Jun-Won Lee5, Karsten Schenke6, Sang Yeub Lee7, Stefan Harb8.   

Abstract

Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures, transradial access, compared with transfemoral access, is associated with a reduced risk for complications including mortality, especially in higher risk patients. However, transradial access is limited by radial artery occlusion (RAO) that despite being mostly asymptomatic because of the extensive anastomoses between the forearm arteries restricts future use of the same radial artery. Distal radial access (DRA) in the anatomic snuffbox or on the dorsum of the hand has recently gained global popularity as an alternative access route for vascular procedures. A strong anatomic and physiological rationale yields potential for significantly reduced risk for RAO and positive impact on procedural outcome for better patient care. Indeed, currently published studies buttress very low rates of RAO after DRA, hence supporting its development. The authors provide an analysis of the foundation of DRA, provide historical background, and offer a critical review of its current status and future directions. Also, given the limited evidence currently available to properly perform DRA in the real world, consensus opinion on what is considered optimal practice is also presented to supplement this document and enhance the implementation of DRA while minimizing its complications.
Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomic snuffbox; consensus; distal radial access; transradial access

Year:  2021        PMID: 33888235     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  5 in total

1.  Switching From Proximal to Distal Radial Artery Access for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization.

Authors:  Alexandru Achim; Tímea Szigethy; Dorottya Olajos; Levente Molnár; Roland Papp; György Bárczi; Kornél Kákonyi; István F Édes; Dávid Becker; Béla Merkely; Jef Van den Eynde; Zoltán Ruzsa
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Angiography or Intervention through the Distal Radial Access: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jun Cao; Huaxiu Cai; Weibin Liu; Hengqing Zhu; Gang Cao
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Comparison between the Right and Left Distal Radial Access for Patients Undergoing Coronary Procedures: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Kristian Rivera; Diego Fernández-Rodríguez; Juan Casanova-Sandoval; Ignacio Barriuso; Marta Zielonka; Nuria Pueyo-Balsells; Immaculada Calaf Valls; Fernando Worner
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 1.776

4.  The technical features of the diagnosis or treatment of coronary artery disease through the distal radial artery approach at the anatomical snuffbox compared with the conventional radial artery approach.

Authors:  Yingkai Xu; Hongzhen Niu; Yi Yu; Lixia Yang; Haiyang Wang; Biyang Zhang; Qi Zhao; Qiang Yong; Yujie Zhou
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Feasibility and Safety of the Left Distal Radial Approach in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions.

Authors:  Oh-Hyun Lee; Ji Woong Roh; Eui Im; Deok-Kyu Cho; Myung Ho Jeong; Donghoon Choi; Yongcheol Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.