Sven H Loosen1, Hans H Bock, Martin Hellmich, Wolfram T Knoefel, Christian Trautwein, Verena Keitel, Johannes G Bode, Ulf P Neumann, Tom Luedde. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectiology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf; Liver Transplant Society Aachen-Düsseldorf-Maastricht; Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne; Department for General Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen; Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen; Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) has undergone dynamic developments in recent decades. In Germany, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) recently tightened the guidelines regarding the minimum number of transplantations a center should perform annually. The aim of the study presented here, was to analyze recent trends in hospital mortality due to LT in Germany. METHODS: Standardized hospital discharge data (2008-2017) from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany were used to establish hospital mortality after LT and case volume distribution among centers performing <20 LT annually (low volume centers, LVC), 20-49 LT (medium volume centers, MVC), and ≥ 50 LT (high volume centers, HVC). RESULTS: Data from 9254 LT procedures were evaluated. The annual frequency of LT fell from n = 984 (2008) to n = 747 (2017), and over the same period the hospital mortality for all LT procedures went down from 15.8% to 11.0%. Hospital mortality was associated with age (<16 years: 5.3% to 60-69 years: 17.4%); however, there was no further increase in patients ≥ 70 years (16.5%). Univariate analysis revealed association of increased hospital mortality with liver disease etiology, the necessity for relaparotomy, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The proportion of LT procedures performed in LVC and MVC increased and that in HVC decreased. LVC had higher hospital mortality than MVC/HVC, but this effect was dependent on patient age and disease etiology. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that differences in mortality rate after LT among centers (LVC vs. MVC/HVC) were dependent on patient age and disease etiology. This should be taken into account when discussing the overall organization of LT in Germany.
BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) has undergone dynamic developments in recent decades. In Germany, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) recently tightened the guidelines regarding the minimum number of transplantations a center should perform annually. The aim of the study presented here, was to analyze recent trends in hospital mortality due to LT in Germany. METHODS: Standardized hospital discharge data (2008-2017) from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany were used to establish hospital mortality after LT and case volume distribution among centers performing <20 LT annually (low volume centers, LVC), 20-49 LT (medium volume centers, MVC), and ≥ 50 LT (high volume centers, HVC). RESULTS: Data from 9254 LT procedures were evaluated. The annual frequency of LT fell from n = 984 (2008) to n = 747 (2017), and over the same period the hospital mortality for all LT procedures went down from 15.8% to 11.0%. Hospital mortality was associated with age (<16 years: 5.3% to 60-69 years: 17.4%); however, there was no further increase in patients ≥ 70 years (16.5%). Univariate analysis revealed association of increased hospital mortality with liver disease etiology, the necessity for relaparotomy, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The proportion of LT procedures performed in LVC and MVC increased and that in HVC decreased. LVC had higher hospital mortality than MVC/HVC, but this effect was dependent on patient age and disease etiology. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that differences in mortality rate after LT among centers (LVC vs. MVC/HVC) were dependent on patient age and disease etiology. This should be taken into account when discussing the overall organization of LT in Germany.
Authors: Hui Yuan; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Vikram Chawa; Mark A Schnitzler; Huiling Xiao; David Axelrod; Nino Dzebisashvili; Krista L Lentine Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Tobias J Weismüller; Ahmed Negm; Thomas Becker; Hannelore Barg-Hock; Jürgen Klempnauer; Michael P Manns; Christian P Strassburg Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2009-07-10 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Kevin Schulte; Christoph Borzikowsky; Axel Rahmel; Felix Kolibay; Nina Polze; Patrick Fränkel; Susanne Mikle; Benedikt Alders; Ulrich Kunzendorf; Thorsten Feldkamp Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Javier F Aduen; Bangarulingam Sujay; Rolland C Dickson; Michael G Heckman; Winston R Hewitt; Wolf H Stapelfeldt; Jeffrey L Steers; Denise M Harnois; David J Kramer Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Sebastian Cammann; Kai Timrott; Florian W R Vondran; Harald Schrem; Frank Lehner; Jürgen Klempnauer; Wolfgang Knitsch; Moritz Kleine Journal: Exp Clin Transplant Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 0.945
Authors: Armin Wiegering; Johanna Wagner; Philip Baum; Johannes Diers; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Ingo Klein Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Franziska Alexandra Meister; Jan Bednarsch; Iakovos Amygdalos; Joerg Boecker; Pavel Strnad; Philipp Bruners; Sven Arke Lang; Tom Florian Ulmer; Lara Heij; Daniel Antonio Morales Santana; Wen-Jia Liu; Georg Lurje; Ulf Peter Neumann; Zoltan Czigany Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 4.379