Literature DB >> 33888199

Hospital Mortality and Current Trends in Liver Transplantation in Germany—a Systematic Analysis of Standardized Hospital Discharge Data, 2008–2017

Sven H Loosen1, Hans H Bock, Martin Hellmich, Wolfram T Knoefel, Christian Trautwein, Verena Keitel, Johannes G Bode, Ulf P Neumann, Tom Luedde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) has undergone dynamic developments in recent decades. In Germany, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) recently tightened the guidelines regarding the minimum number of transplantations a center should perform annually. The aim of the study presented here, was to analyze recent trends in hospital mortality due to LT in Germany.
METHODS: Standardized hospital discharge data (2008-2017) from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany were used to establish hospital mortality after LT and case volume distribution among centers performing <20 LT annually (low volume centers, LVC), 20-49 LT (medium volume centers, MVC), and ≥ 50 LT (high volume centers, HVC).
RESULTS: Data from 9254 LT procedures were evaluated. The annual frequency of LT fell from n = 984 (2008) to n = 747 (2017), and over the same period the hospital mortality for all LT procedures went down from 15.8% to 11.0%. Hospital mortality was associated with age (<16 years: 5.3% to 60-69 years: 17.4%); however, there was no further increase in patients ≥ 70 years (16.5%). Univariate analysis revealed association of increased hospital mortality with liver disease etiology, the necessity for relaparotomy, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The proportion of LT procedures performed in LVC and MVC increased and that in HVC decreased. LVC had higher hospital mortality than MVC/HVC, but this effect was dependent on patient age and disease etiology.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that differences in mortality rate after LT among centers (LVC vs. MVC/HVC) were dependent on patient age and disease etiology. This should be taken into account when discussing the overall organization of LT in Germany.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33888199      PMCID: PMC8476820          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  18 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of mechanical ventilation after liver transplantation: a national database study.

Authors:  Hui Yuan; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Vikram Chawa; Mark A Schnitzler; Huiling Xiao; David Axelrod; Nino Dzebisashvili; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Gender disparity in liver transplant waiting-list mortality: the importance of kidney function.

Authors:  Ayse L Mindikoglu; Arie Regev; Stephen L Seliger; Laurence S Magder
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  The introduction of MELD-based organ allocation impacts 3-month survival after liver transplantation by influencing pretransplant patient characteristics.

Authors:  Tobias J Weismüller; Ahmed Negm; Thomas Becker; Hannelore Barg-Hock; Jürgen Klempnauer; Michael P Manns; Christian P Strassburg
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.782

4.  Decline in Organ Donation in Germany.

Authors:  Kevin Schulte; Christoph Borzikowsky; Axel Rahmel; Felix Kolibay; Nina Polze; Patrick Fränkel; Susanne Mikle; Benedikt Alders; Ulrich Kunzendorf; Thorsten Feldkamp
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Liver transplantation in Germany.

Authors:  Frank Tacke; Daniela C Kroy; Ana Paula Barreiros; Ulf P Neumann
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Adult orthotopic liver transplantation in the United Kingdom and Ireland between 1994 and 2005.

Authors:  Jan H P van der Meulen; Jim D Lewsey; Muhammad F Dawwas; Lynn P Copley
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Outcomes after liver transplant in patients aged 70 years or older compared with those younger than 60 years.

Authors:  Javier F Aduen; Bangarulingam Sujay; Rolland C Dickson; Michael G Heckman; Winston R Hewitt; Wolf H Stapelfeldt; Jeffrey L Steers; Denise M Harnois; David J Kramer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Early Tracheostomy Reduces Time of Mechanical Ventilation in Respiratory High-Risk Patients After Liver Transplant.

Authors:  Sebastian Cammann; Kai Timrott; Florian W R Vondran; Harald Schrem; Frank Lehner; Jürgen Klempnauer; Wolfgang Knitsch; Moritz Kleine
Journal:  Exp Clin Transplant       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 0.945

Review 9.  Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: Risk factors, screening and clinical presentation.

Authors:  Norma Arteiro Filgueira
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2019-03-27

10.  Volume and outcome relation in German liver transplant centers: what lessons can be learned?

Authors:  Annemarie Nijboer; Frank Ulrich; Wolf O Bechstein; Andreas A Schnitzbauer
Journal:  Transplant Res       Date:  2014-02-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Numbers Are Slightly Confusing.

Authors:  Armin Wiegering; Johanna Wagner; Philip Baum; Johannes Diers; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Ingo Klein
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  In Reply.

Authors:  Sven H Loosen; Tom Luedde
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Various myosteatosis selection criteria and their value in the assessment of short- and long-term outcomes following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Franziska Alexandra Meister; Jan Bednarsch; Iakovos Amygdalos; Joerg Boecker; Pavel Strnad; Philipp Bruners; Sven Arke Lang; Tom Florian Ulmer; Lara Heij; Daniel Antonio Morales Santana; Wen-Jia Liu; Georg Lurje; Ulf Peter Neumann; Zoltan Czigany
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.