Jessica N Fish1, John Salerno2, Natasha D Williams1, R Gordon Rinderknecht3, Kelsey J Drotning4, Liana Sayer4, Long Doan4. 1. Department of Family Science and School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA. 2. Department of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA. 3. Laboratory of Digital and Computational Demography, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany. 4. Department of Sociology, College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accentuated long-standing population health disparities in the United States. We examined how the pandemic and its social consequences may differentially impact sexual minority adults, relative to heterosexual adults. Methods: Data are from a U.S. national sample of adults (n = 2996; 18.06%) collected from online panels from April to May 2020. We used eight indicators of well-being-mental health, physical health, quality of life, stress, loneliness, psychological distress, alcohol use, and fatigue-to assess the degree to which sexual identity subgroups (i.e., heterosexual, gay/lesbian, bisexual, and "other" sexual minority) varied in retrospective pre- and postpandemic onset indicators of well-being and whether groups varied in their rate of change from pre- and postpandemic onset. Results: The results showed consistent patterns of decline in well-being across sexual identity subgroups, although changes in mental health, physical health, quality of life, stress, and psychological distress were more robust among sexual minority adults in general, relative to heterosexual adults. Adjusted multivariate models testing differences in change in retrospective pre- and postpandemic onset found that well-being among bisexual men and women was most negatively impacted by the pandemic. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic may have distinct health consequences for sexual minority adults in the United States. Our findings support and further legitimize calls for more comprehensive surveillance and cultural responsiveness in emergency preparedness as it relates to sexual minority people and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accentuated long-standing population health disparities in the United States. We examined how the pandemic and its social consequences may differentially impact sexual minority adults, relative to heterosexual adults. Methods: Data are from a U.S. national sample of adults (n = 2996; 18.06%) collected from online panels from April to May 2020. We used eight indicators of well-being-mental health, physical health, quality of life, stress, loneliness, psychological distress, alcohol use, and fatigue-to assess the degree to which sexual identity subgroups (i.e., heterosexual, gay/lesbian, bisexual, and "other" sexual minority) varied in retrospective pre- and postpandemic onset indicators of well-being and whether groups varied in their rate of change from pre- and postpandemic onset. Results: The results showed consistent patterns of decline in well-being across sexual identity subgroups, although changes in mental health, physical health, quality of life, stress, and psychological distress were more robust among sexual minority adults in general, relative to heterosexual adults. Adjusted multivariate models testing differences in change in retrospective pre- and postpandemic onset found that well-being among bisexual men and women was most negatively impacted by the pandemic. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic may have distinct health consequences for sexual minority adults in the United States. Our findings support and further legitimize calls for more comprehensive surveillance and cultural responsiveness in emergency preparedness as it relates to sexual minority people and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; LGB; coronavirus; health disparities; mental health; sexual minority
Authors: Alexander J Martos; Patrick A Wilson; Allegra R Gordon; Marguerita Lightfoot; Ilan H Meyer Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Gregory Phillips Ii; Dylan Felt; Megan M Ruprecht; Xinzi Wang; Jiayi Xu; Esrea Pérez-Bill; Rocco M Bagnarol; Jason Roth; Caleb W Curry; Lauren B Beach Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Jessica N Fish; Lauren B McInroy; Megan S Paceley; Natasha D Williams; Sara Henderson; Deborah S Levine; Rachel N Edsall Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Kimberly J Mitchell; Michele L Ybarra; Victoria Banyard; Kimberly L Goodman; Lisa M Jones Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2021-11-05 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Kristi E Gamarel; Catherine Washington; Matthew T Rosso; Lynae A Darbes; Kristina Felder Claude; Lisa Hightow-Weidman; Patrick Sullivan; Rob Stephenson Journal: Arch Sex Behav Date: 2022-06-07
Authors: Stephanie T Lanza; Courtney A Whetzel; Ashley N Linden-Carmichael; Craig J Newschaffer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 3.752