Literature DB >> 3388484

Cost comparison of intraoperative autologous versus homologous transfusion.

M D Solomon1, M L Rutledge, L E Kane, D H Yawn.   

Abstract

The cost of autologous transfusions using semiautomated instruments in 52 orthopedic cases, 75 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) cases, and 218 aortic aneurysm cases was compared to the cost of equal amounts of homologous blood. While none of the orthopedic cases reached cost equivalence (median cost deficit per case, +97), 31 percent of the CABG cases (median cost deficit per case, +61) and 56 percent of the thoracic aortic aneurysm cases (mean cost surplus per case, +30) did so. In most cases, the major orthopedic and CABG procedures do not reach cost equivalence and might be served better by other means of autologous blood recovery. The more expensive semicontinuous flow devices are more cost-effective for higher-yield cases, such as major aortic aneurysm procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3388484     DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1988.28488265272.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  3 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness of epoetin-alpha to augment preoperative autologous blood donation in elective cardiac surgery.

Authors:  D Coyle; K M Lee; D A Fergusson; A Laupacis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Autologous blood donation in a small general acute-care hospital.

Authors:  L S Mott; M J Jones
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Autologous deposit of blood by oncology patients: an evaluation of actual use and wastage.

Authors:  S P Shaheen; B Lichtiger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.344

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.