Auwal Abdullahi1,2, Sevim Acaroz Candan3, Melda Soysal Tomruk4, Abdulsalam Mohammed Yakasai5, Steven Truijen6, Wim Saeys6. 1. Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Physiotherapy, Bayero University Kano, PMB 3011, Gwarzo road, Kano, Nigeria. aabdullahi.pth@buk.edu.ng. 2. Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, D.R.312, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium. aabdullahi.pth@buk.edu.ng. 3. Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ordu University, 52100, Ordu, Turkey. 4. Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Mehmet Akif University, Burdur, Turkey. 5. Medical Rehabilitation Therapists (Reg.) Board of Nigeria, Kano Zonal Office, Kano, Nigeria. 6. Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, D.R.312, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High repetitions of task practice is required for the recovery of the motor function during constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). This can be achieved into ways: when the task practice is measured in hours of practice or when the number of repetitions is counted. However, it has been argued that using hours of task practice as a measure of practice does not provide a clear instruction on the dose of practice. AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility and effects of the CIMT protocol that uses the number of repetitions of task practice. MATERIALS/ METHOD: The study was a systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020142140). Five databases, PubMED, CENTRAL, PEDro, OTSeeker and Web of Science, were searched. Studies of any designs in adults with stroke were included if they used the number of repetitions of task practice as a measure of dose. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using Modified McMaster critical review form. The results were analysed using qualitative synthesis. RESULTS: Eight studies (n = 205) were included in the study. The number of task repetitions in the studies ranges between 45 and 1280 per day. The results showed that CIMT protocol using the number of repetitions of task practice was feasible and improved outcomes such as motor function, quality of life, functional mobility and spasticity. CONCLUSION: The number of repetitions of task practice as a measure of CIMT dose can be used in place of the existing protocol that uses the number of hours of task practice.
BACKGROUND: High repetitions of task practice is required for the recovery of the motor function during constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). This can be achieved into ways: when the task practice is measured in hours of practice or when the number of repetitions is counted. However, it has been argued that using hours of task practice as a measure of practice does not provide a clear instruction on the dose of practice. AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility and effects of the CIMT protocol that uses the number of repetitions of task practice. MATERIALS/ METHOD: The study was a systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020142140). Five databases, PubMED, CENTRAL, PEDro, OTSeeker and Web of Science, were searched. Studies of any designs in adults with stroke were included if they used the number of repetitions of task practice as a measure of dose. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using Modified McMaster critical review form. The results were analysed using qualitative synthesis. RESULTS: Eight studies (n = 205) were included in the study. The number of task repetitions in the studies ranges between 45 and 1280 per day. The results showed that CIMT protocol using the number of repetitions of task practice was feasible and improved outcomes such as motor function, quality of life, functional mobility and spasticity. CONCLUSION: The number of repetitions of task practice as a measure of CIMT dose can be used in place of the existing protocol that uses the number of hours of task practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
Activities of daily living; Constraint-induced movement therapy; Disability; Mobility; Motor function; Quality of life
Authors: Ralph L Sacco; Scott E Kasner; Joseph P Broderick; Louis R Caplan; J J Buddy Connors; Antonio Culebras; Mitchell S V Elkind; Mary G George; Allen D Hamdan; Randall T Higashida; Brian L Hoh; L Scott Janis; Carlos S Kase; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Jin-Moo Lee; Michael E Moseley; Eric D Peterson; Tanya N Turan; Amy L Valderrama; Harry V Vinters Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Kênia K Menezes; Christina D Faria; Aline A Scianni; Patrick R Avelino; Iza Faria-Fortini; Luci F Teixeira-Salmela Journal: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 2.874
Authors: E Taub; N E Miller; T A Novack; E W Cook; W C Fleming; C S Nepomuceno; J S Connell; J E Crago Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Hyeon Uk Nam; Jin Seok Huh; Ji Na Yoo; Jong Moon Hwang; Byung Joo Lee; Yu-Sun Min; Chul-Hyun Kim; Tae-Du Jung Journal: Ann Rehabil Med Date: 2014-08-28
Authors: Vladimir Hachinski; Costantino Iadecola; Ron C Petersen; Monique M Breteler; David L Nyenhuis; Sandra E Black; William J Powers; Charles DeCarli; Jose G Merino; Raj N Kalaria; Harry V Vinters; David M Holtzman; Gary A Rosenberg; Anders Wallin; Martin Dichgans; John R Marler; Gabrielle G Leblanc Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-08-17 Impact factor: 7.914