Tasneem Raja1,2, Helena Tuomainen3, Jason Madan4, Dipesh Mistry5, Sanjeev Jain6, Kamala Easwaran3,7, Swaran P Singh8. 1. Tata Trusts, World Trade Center, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, 400005, India. tasneemraja@gmail.com. 2. Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England. tasneemraja@gmail.com. 3. Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England. 4. Centre for Health Economics, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England. 5. Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England. 6. Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560029, India. 7. Founder Sumunum Foundation, Chennai, India. 8. Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Psychiatric hospitals or mental asylums grew across the world in the colonial era. Despite concerns over quality of care and human rights violations, these hospitals continue to provide the majority of mental health care in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We sought to review the evidence of reform of mental hospitals and associated patient outcomes. METHODS: We adopted an integrative review methodology by including experimental and non-experimental research. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019130399). A range of databases and systematic hand searches were conducted by two independent reviewers. Research conducted between 1980 and May 2019, that focused on any aspect of reform in mental hospitals for adults (age 18 and upwards) with severe mental illness and published in English, were considered. RESULTS: 16 studies were included in the review. 12 studies met inclusion criteria, and four additional reports emerged from the hand search. Studies covered-India, China, South Africa, Grenada, Georgia, Sri Lanka, Argentina and Brazil. Key findings emphasise the role of judicial intervention as a critical trigger of reform. Structural reform composed of optimisation of resources and renovations of colonial structures to cater to diverse patient needs. Process reforms include changes in medical management, admission processes and a move from closed to open wards. Staff engagement and capacity building have also been used as a modality of reform in mental hospital settings. CONCLUSION: There is some documentation of reform in psychiatric hospitals. However, poor methodological quality and variation in approach and outcomes measured, make it challenging to extrapolate specific findings on process or outcomes of reform. Despite being integral service providers, psychiatric hospitals still do not adopt patient centric, recovery-oriented processes. Hence, there is an urgent need to generate robust evidence on psychiatric reform and its effect on patient outcomes.
PURPOSE:Psychiatric hospitals or mental asylums grew across the world in the colonial era. Despite concerns over quality of care and human rights violations, these hospitals continue to provide the majority of mental health care in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We sought to review the evidence of reform of mental hospitals and associated patient outcomes. METHODS: We adopted an integrative review methodology by including experimental and non-experimental research. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019130399). A range of databases and systematic hand searches were conducted by two independent reviewers. Research conducted between 1980 and May 2019, that focused on any aspect of reform in mental hospitals for adults (age 18 and upwards) with severe mental illness and published in English, were considered. RESULTS: 16 studies were included in the review. 12 studies met inclusion criteria, and four additional reports emerged from the hand search. Studies covered-India, China, South Africa, Grenada, Georgia, Sri Lanka, Argentina and Brazil. Key findings emphasise the role of judicial intervention as a critical trigger of reform. Structural reform composed of optimisation of resources and renovations of colonial structures to cater to diverse patient needs. Process reforms include changes in medical management, admission processes and a move from closed to open wards. Staff engagement and capacity building have also been used as a modality of reform in mental hospital settings. CONCLUSION: There is some documentation of reform in psychiatric hospitals. However, poor methodological quality and variation in approach and outcomes measured, make it challenging to extrapolate specific findings on process or outcomes of reform. Despite being integral service providers, psychiatric hospitals still do not adopt patient centric, recovery-oriented processes. Hence, there is an urgent need to generate robust evidence on psychiatric reform and its effect on patient outcomes.
Authors: Paloma Mello Bandeira; Cynthia Haddad P Souza; Juliana C da Silva Guimarães; Antonio José de Almeida Filho; Maria Angélica de Almeida Peres Journal: Issues Ment Health Nurs Date: 2015 Impact factor: 1.835
Authors: Gisele Huf; Evandro S F Coutinho; Marco A V Ferreira; Silvana Ferreira; Flavia Mello; Clive E Adams Journal: Trials Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 2.279