| Literature DB >> 33883629 |
Yanhong Lu1,2, Yajie Gao1,2, Jun Nie3,4, Yulin Liao5,6, Qidong Zhu1,2.
Abstract
Organic manure is an ideEntities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33883629 PMCID: PMC8060255 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87851-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Variation and distribution of grain yields for early rice (A,B) and late rice (C,D) under different fertilization treatments CK, NK, NPK and NKM across 35 years. Red lines indicate the mean value, and different lower case letters indicate significant differences for the mean grain yield (n = 3) between treatments at p < 0.05 in (B,D).
Figure 2Variation and distribution of straw yields for early rice (A,B) and late rice (C,D) under different fertilization treatments CK, NK, NPK and NKM across 35 years. Red lines indicate the mean value, and different lower case letters indicate significant differences for the mean straw yield (n = 3) between treatments at p < 0.05 in (B,D).
Figure 3Distribution of P content in plant of early (A) and late rice (C), and the annual mean aboveground P uptake of early (B) and late rice (D) under different fertilization treatments CK, NK, NPK and NKM across 35 years. White and gray boxes indicate P content in grain and straw, respectively, and red lines indicate the mean value in (A,C). Error bars are standard error of three replicates, and different lower case letters indicate significant differences for the annual mean aboveground P uptake between treatments at p < 0.05 in (B,D).
Analysis of variance for the effects of fertilization application, precipitation, temperature and the interactions between fertilization and the other variables on grain yield, straw yield, grain P content, straw P content and aboveground P uptake.
| Grain yield | Straw yield | Grain P content | Straw P content | P uptake | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fertilization ( | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Precipitation ( | ns | ** | * | * | ns |
| Temperature ( | ns | ns | *** | ns | *** |
| ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| *** | ** | ns | * | ** | |
| ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | |
| ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| Fertilization ( | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Precipitation ( | * | *** | ns | ns | ** |
| Temperature ( | ** | *** | *** | *** | * |
| ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| * | ns | * | ns | ** | |
| ** | ** | ns | ns | * | |
| ns | ns | ns | * | ns | |
Precipitation is arbitrarily divided into three levels of < 600, 600–800 and > 800 mm for early rice season; and into three levels of < 150, 150–300 and > 300 mm for late rice season.
Temperature (monthly) is arbitrarily divided into three levels of < 23, 23–24 and > 24 ℃ for both the early and late rice season.
CK: unfertilized control; NK: mineral fertilizer NK; NPK: mineral fertilizer NPK; NKM: mineral fertilizer NK combined with pig manure, PRE: phosphorus recovery efficiency.
ns Not significant at p < 0.05.
* Denote significant difference in ANOVA at p < 0.05.
** Denote significant difference in ANOVA at p < 0.01.
*** Denote significant difference in ANOVA at p < 0.001.
Figure 4Variation of P use efficiency (PUE) for early (A) and late rice (B), and the average PUE (C) under NPK and NKM fertilization treatments across 35 years. Error bars are standard error of three replicates, and different lower case letters indicate significant differences between treatments at p < 0.05 in (C).
Figure 5Variation of cumulative P use efficiency (PUE) for early (A) and late rice (B), and the average cumulative PUE (C) under NPK and NKM fertilization treatments across 35 years. Error bars are standard error of three replicates, and different lower case letters indicate significant differences between treatments at p < 0.05 in (C).
Figure 6Variation and distribution of soil total P content (A,B) and soil available P content (C,D) in 0–15 cm layer under different fertilization treatments CK, NK, NPK and NKM across 35 years. Red lines in (B,D) indicate the mean value.
Linear model analyzing the trend of soil total and available P content changing with experimental years (1981–2015).
| Treatment | Soil total P | Soil available P | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slope | R2 | Slope | R2 | |||
| CK | − 0.003 | 0.624 | < 0.001 | − 0.220 | 0.843 | < 0.001 |
| NK | − 0.001 | 0.118 | < 0.05 | − 0.162 | 0.584 | < 0.001 |
| NPK | 0.007 | 0.587 | < 0.001 | 0.059 | 0.052 | 0.182 |
| NKM | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.311 | − 0.128 | 0.573 | < 0.001 |
The slope is the average increase of soil total or available P content with year. R is the coefficient of the correlation between the soil total or available P content and the experimental year. CK: unfertilized control; NK: mineral fertilizer NK; NPK: mineral fertilizer NPK; NKM: mineral fertilizer NK combined with pig manure.
Annual P balance over 35-year experimental period (1981–2015).
| Item | CK | NK | NPK | NKM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fertilizer | 0.0 | 0.0 | 78.4 | 0.0 |
| Pig manure | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 60.6 |
| Corp removal | 17.1 | 21.7 | 49.0 | 37.5 |
| P storage in top soil layer | − 5.8 | − 3.6 | 17.6 | 0.9 |
| Calculated P loss | − 11.4 | − 18.1 | 11.8 | 22.1 |
| PRE | 62.5% | 61.9% | ||
CK: unfertilized control; NK: mineral fertilizer NK; NPK: mineral fertilizer NPK; NKM: mineral fertilizer NK combined with pig manure, PRE: phosphorus recovery efficiency.
Figure 7Total precipitation from April to October in each year (A), monthly precipitation (B), and monthly mean temperature from April to October in the years from 1981 to 2015 (C). Red lines indicate the mean value.
Soil basal characteristics in 0–15 cm soil layer in 1981.
| Characteristics | ||
|---|---|---|
| pH | 6.6 | |
| Bulk density | g cm3 | 1.12 |
| Soil organic carbon | g kg−1 | 19.9 |
| Total N | g kg−1 | 2.05 |
| Total P | g kg−1 | 0.66 |
| Total K | g kg−1 | 14.1 |
| Alkali-hydrolyzale N | mg kg−1 | 151 |
| Olsen-P | mg kg−1 | 10.2 |
| Exchangeable K | mg kg−1 | 62.3 |
Descriptions of N, P, K applications of early and late rice under different fertilization treatments.
| Treatment | Early rice (kg hm−2) | Late rice (kg hm−2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P | K | N | P | K | |
| CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NK | 150 | 0 | 99.6 | 180 | 99.6 | |
| NPK | 150 | 39.2 | 99.6 | 180 | 39.2 | 99.6 |
| NKM | 150 + 27 | 0 + 30.3 | 99.6 + 17.4 | 180 + 27 | 0 + 30.3 | 99.6 + 17.4 |
In the NKM treatment, the first and the second value are the amount of NPK applied as chemical fertilizer and as pig manure, respectively. CK: unfertilized control; NK: mineral fertilizer NK; NPK: mineral fertilizer NPK; NKM: mineral fertilizer NK combined with pig manure.