Literature DB >> 33883494

Safety of Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy by a Low-Dose Dosimetric Approach Using 177Lu-FAPI04.

Serkan Kuyumcu1, Bilal Kovan, Yasemin Sanli, Fikret Buyukkaya, Duygu Has Simsek, Zeynep Gözde Özkan, Emine Goknur Isik, Meltem Ekenel, Cuneyt Turkmen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study is set out to estimate the radiation-absorbed doses to normal organs and tumor tissue using low-dose 177Lu-FAPI04 dosimetry to determine the safety and theranostic potential of fibroblast activation protein-targeted radionuclide therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients with metastatic advanced-stage cancer were administered low-dose 177Lu-FAPI04 for dosimetry measurements. Data acquisition for dosimetry of normal organs and tumors was performed by whole-body and 3D SPECT/CT imaging at 4, 24, 48, and 96 hours after administering 177Lu-FAPI04. Blood samples were drawn at 5, 15, 30, 60, 60, 120, and 180 minutes, and at 24, 48, and 96 hours for bone marrow dosimetry calculations.
RESULTS: Mean absorbed doses per megabecquerel were 0.25 ± 0.16 mGy (range, 0.11-0.47 mGy), 0.11 ± 0.08 mGy (range, 0.06-0.22 mGy), and 0.04 ± 0.002 mGy (range, 0.04-0.046 mGy) for kidneys, liver, and bone marrow, respectively. The respective maximum estimated amount of radioactivity to reach radiation-absorbed dose limits were 120.9 ± 68.6 GBq, 47.5 ± 2.8 GBq, 397.8 ± 217.1 GBq, and 52.4 ± 15.3 GBq for kidneys, bone marrow, liver, and total body. The mean absorbed dose per megabecquerel was 0.62 ± 0.55 mGy for bone metastases, 0.38 ± 0.22 mGy for metastatic lymph nodes, 0.33 ± 0.21 mGy for liver metastases, and 0.37 ± 0.29 for metastatic soft tissue. The maximum absorbed dose in a tumor lesion was 1.67 mGy/MBq for bone, 0.6 mGy/MBq for lymph node, 0.62 mGy/MBq for liver, and 1 mGy/MBq for soft tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: The mean absorbed dose to organs at risk with 177Lu-FAPI04 is reasonably low, allowing for low tumor-absorbed dose rates by administering a higher dose. Further research on optimizing therapeutic efficacy and using alternative radioisotopes is necessary, along with an individualized dosimetric approach.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33883494     DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  8 in total

Review 1.  Radionuclide imaging and therapy directed towards the tumor microenvironment: a multi-cancer approach for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Circe D van der Heide; Simone U Dalm
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Dimeric FAPI with potential for tumor theranostics.

Authors:  Chunxia Qin; Yangmeihui Song; Weibo Cai; Xiaoli Lan
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-12-15

3.  Could Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP)-Specific Radioligands Be Considered as Pan-Tumor Agents?

Authors:  Hessamoddin Roustaei; Zahra Kiamanesh; Emran Askari; Ramin Sadeghi; Kamran Aryana; Giorgio Treglia
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Fibroblast activation protein-based theranostics in cancer research: A state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Jianhao Chen; Yizhen Pang; Kaili Fu; Qihang Shang; Hua Wu; Long Sun; Qin Lin; Haojun Chen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 11.556

5.  Evans blue-modified radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor as long-acting cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Xuejun Wen; Pengfei Xu; Mengqi Shi; Jia Liu; Xinying Zeng; Yiren Zhang; Changrong Shi; Jingchao Li; Zhide Guo; Xianzhong Zhang; Pek-Lan Khong; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 11.600

6.  Non-conventional and Investigational PET Radiotracers for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michele Balma; Virginia Liberini; Manuela Racca; Riccardo Laudicella; Matteo Bauckneht; Ambra Buschiazzo; Daniele Giovanni Nicolotti; Simona Peano; Andrea Bianchi; Giovanni Albano; Natale Quartuccio; Ronan Abgral; Silvia Daniela Morbelli; Calogero D'Alessandria; Enzo Terreno; Martin William Huellner; Alberto Papaleo; Désirée Deandreis
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-12

7.  Radiosynthesis and First Preclinical Evaluation of the Novel 11C-Labeled FAP Inhibitor 11C-FAPI: A Comparative Study of 11C-FAPIs and (68Ga) Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in a High-FAP-Expression Mouse Model.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Zhoumi Hu; Fan Ding; Haitao Zhao; Fuqiang Du; Chun Lv; Lianghua Li; Gang Huang; Jianjun Liu
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.545

8.  From Automated Synthesis to In Vivo Application in Multiple Types of Cancer-Clinical Results with [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m.SA.FAPi.

Authors:  Lukas Greifenstein; Carsten S Kramer; Euy Sung Moon; Frank Rösch; Andre Klega; Christian Landvogt; Corinna Müller; Richard P Baum
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.