Literature DB >> 33883174

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation from Overweight or Obese Donors in Cachectic Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study.

Nicolien C de Clercq1, Tom van den Ende2, Andrei Prodan3, Robert Hemke4, Mark Davids3, Helle K Pedersen5, Henrik B Nielsen5, A K Groen3, Willem M de Vos6,7, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven8, Max Nieuwdorp3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome, associated with poor survival in patients with cancer, and is influenced by the gut microbiota. We investigated the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on cachexia and treatment response in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial performed in the Amsterdam University Medical Center, we assigned 24 cachectic patients with metastatic HER2-negative gastroesophageal cancer to either allogenic FMT (healthy obese donor) or autologous FMT, prior to palliative chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Primary objective was to assess the effect of allogenic FMT on satiety. Secondary outcomes were other features of cachexia, along with disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Finally, exploratory analyses were performed on the effect of FMT on gut microbiota composition (metagenomic sequencing) and metabolites (untargeted metabolomics).
RESULTS: Allogenic FMT did not improve any of the cachexia outcomes. Patients in the allogenic group (n = 12) had a higher DCR at 12 weeks (P = 0.035) compared with the autologous group (n = 12), longer median OS of 365 versus 227 days [HR = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-1.05; P = 0.057] and PFS of 204 versus 93 days (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.21-1.20; P = 0.092). Patients in the allogenic group showed a significant shift in fecal microbiota composition after FMT (P = 0.010) indicating proper engraftment of the donor microbiota.
CONCLUSIONS: FMT from a healthy obese donor prior to first-line chemotherapy did not affect cachexia, but may have improved response and survival in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. These results provide a rational for larger FMT trials. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33883174     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  4 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study from the National Cancer Center in China.

Authors:  Guochao Zhang; Chaoqi Zhang; Nan Sun; Liyan Xue; Zhaoyang Yang; Lingling Fang; Zhihui Zhang; Yuejun Luo; Shugeng Gao; Qi Xue; Juwei Mu; Yushun Gao; Fengwei Tan; Jie He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Fecal microbiota transplantation and fiber supplementation, better together?

Authors:  Nordin M J Hanssen; Max Nieuwdorp
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-09-23

3.  Common Pathogenetic Mechanisms Underlying Aging and Tumor and Means of Interventions.

Authors:  Weiyi Shen; Jiamin He; Tongyao Hou; Jianmin Si; Shujie Chen
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 9.968

4.  Gut microbiome and pancreatic cancer cachexia: An evolving relationship.

Authors:  Andrew Hendifar; Rasaq Akinsola; Hayato Muranaka; Arsen Osipov; Shant Thomassian; Natalie Moshayedi; Julianne Yang; Jonathan Jacobs; Suzanne Devkota; Neil Bhowmick; Jun Gong
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-07-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.