Literature DB >> 33882249

The incidence and relevance of non-fatty components in trunk and extremity lipomatous soft tissue masses.

Rupert Berkeley1, Odinakachukwu Okereke2, Karan Malhotra2, Asif Saifuddin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and diagnostic relevance of non-fatty 'solid appearing' components within lipomatous tumours of the trunk and extremity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective review of patients referred to a specialist musculoskeletal oncology service over a 12-month period with a lipomatous trunk or extremity soft tissue tumour. The presence and morphology (solitary/multifocal; homogeneous/heterogeneous; well-defined/poorly defined) of non-fatty components was recorded based on MRI and compared with the final histological diagnosis.
RESULTS: 213 patients with 217 lipomatous tumours were included, 119 (55.9%) males and 94 (44.1%) females with mean age of 54.6 years (range 7-93 years). Seventy-seven (35.5%) lesions arose superficial to the fascia and 139 (64.1%) deep, while a single case involved both compartments. Mean maximal tumour dimension was 94.9 mm (range 12-288 mm). Non-fatty 'solid appearing' components were identified in 28 (12.9%) cases, of which eight were solitary and 20 were multifocal, six had homogeneous SI and 22 had heterogeneous SI, and eight had well-defined margins, while 20 had poorly defined margins. Histological diagnosis was available in 20 of the tumours containing non-fatty components, 16 of which were benign, two intermediate grade and two malignant (a dedifferentiated liposarcoma and a myxoid liposarcoma). The commonest diagnosis was spindle cell lipoma, which accounted for 10 of 20 (50%) cases with confirmed histology.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-fatty components are identified in ~13% of trunk and extremity lipomatous tumours. The majority of such lesions are benign lipoma variants, most commonly spindle cell lipoma. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Solid non-fatty components are identified in approximately 13% of lipomatous tumours referred to a specialist sarcoma service. Despite the concern that these may represent dedifferentiated liposarcomas, high-grade tumours were seen in only two cases, the commonest diagnosis being a spindle cell lipoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33882249      PMCID: PMC8173682          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.629


  20 in total

1.  Imaging characteristics of spindle cell lipoma.

Authors:  Laura W Bancroft; Mark J Kransdorf; Jeffrey J Peterson; Murali Sundaram; Mark D Murphey; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Dedifferentiated liposarcoma.

Authors:  A G Nascimento
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Imaging characteristics of spindle cell lipoma and its variants.

Authors:  Alla Khashper; Jiamin Zheng; Ayoub Nahal; Federico Discepola
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Lipomas, lipoma variants, and well-differentiated liposarcomas (atypical lipomas): results of MRI evaluations of 126 consecutive fatty masses.

Authors:  Cree M Gaskin; Clyde A Helms
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Malignant soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of diagnoses by age, sex, and location.

Authors:  M J Kransdorf
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  From the archives of the AFIP: benign musculoskeletal lipomatous lesions.

Authors:  Mark D Murphey; John F Carroll; Donald J Flemming; Thomas L Pope; Francis H Gannon; Mark J Kransdorf
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  MRI characteristics of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma: retrospective comparison with histology and MDM2 gene amplification.

Authors:  Mélanie Brisson; Takeshi Kashima; David Delaney; Roberto Tirabosco; Andrew Clarke; Suzie Cro; Adrienne M Flanagan; Paul O'Donnell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Qualitative evaluation of MRI features of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor: results from a multicenter study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nardo; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Francesco Acquafredda; Silvia Schirò; Andrew L Wong; Dani Sarohia; Roberto Maroldi; Morgan A Darrow; Michele Guindani; Sonia Lee; Michelle Zhang; Ahmed W Moawad; Khaled M Elsayes; Ramsey D Badawi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Diagnostic performance of MRI and histology in assessment of deep lipomatous tumours.

Authors:  L Cairncross; H A Snow; D C Strauss; M J F Smith; O Sjokvist; C Messiou; K Thway; A J Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the extremities: imaging findings in four patients.

Authors:  M J Kransdorf; J M Meis; J S Jelinek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Bone and soft tissue tumors at the borderlands of malignancy.

Authors:  Julia Crim; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Paraplegia due to spinal epidural lipoma without spinal dysraphism in an adolescent patient: a case report.

Authors:  Naoki Segi; Hiroaki Nakashima; Kei Ando; Masaaki Machino; Sadayuki Ito; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Hiroyuki Koshimizu; Hiroyuki Tomita; Takayuki Nojima; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 0.794

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.