Literature DB >> 33882030

Image Quality Assessment for Clinical Cadmium Telluride-Based Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Detector in Cadaveric Wrist Imaging.

Jan-Peter Grunz1, Henner Huflage1, Julius Frederik Heidenreich1, Süleyman Ergün2, Martin Petersilka3, Thomas Allmendinger3, Thorsten Alexander Bley1, Bernhard Petritsch1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Detailed visualization of bone microarchitecture is essential for assessment of wrist fractures in computed tomography (CT). This study aims to evaluate the imaging performance of a CT system with clinical cadmium telluride-based photon-counting detector (PCD-CT) compared with a third-generation dual-source CT scanner with energy-integrating detector technology (EID-CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both CT systems were used for the examination of 8 cadaveric wrists with radiation dose equivalent scan protocols (low-/standard-/full-dose imaging: CTDIvol = 1.50/5.80/8.67 mGy). All wrists were scanned with 2 different operating modes of the photon-counting CT (standard-resolution and ultra-high-resolution). After reformatting with comparable reconstruction parameters and convolution kernels, subjective evaluation of image quality was performed by 3 radiologists on a 7-point scale. For estimation of interrater reliability, we report the intraclass correlation coefficient (absolute agreement, 2-way random-effects model). Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated to provide semiquantitative assessment of image quality.
RESULTS: Subjective image quality of standard-dose PCD-CT examinations in ultra-high-resolution mode was superior compared with full-dose PCD-CT in standard-resolution mode (P = 0.016) and full-dose EID-CT (P = 0.040). No difference was ascertained between low-dose PCD-CT in ultra-high-resolution mode and standard-dose scans with either PCD-CT in standard-resolution mode (P = 0.108) or EID-CT (P = 0.470). Observer evaluation of standard-resolution PCD-CT and EID-CT delivered similar results in full- and standard-dose scans (P = 0.248/0.509). Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.876 (95% confidence interval, 0.744-0.925; P < 0.001), indicating good reliability. Between dose equivalent studies, signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were substantially higher in photon-counting CT examinations (all P's < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Superior visualization of fine anatomy is feasible with the clinical photon-counting CT system in cadaveric wrist scans. The ultra-high-resolution scan mode suggests potential for considerable dose reduction over energy-integrating dual-source CT.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33882030     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  4 in total

1.  Low-Dose High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT of the Lung: Radiation Dose and Image Quality in the Clinical Routine.

Authors:  Matthias Michael Woeltjen; Julius Henning Niehoff; Arwed Elias Michael; Sebastian Horstmeier; Christoph Moenninghoff; Jan Borggrefe; Jan Robert Kroeger
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-11

Review 2.  An introduction to photon-counting detector CT (PCD CT) for radiologists.

Authors:  Yuko Nakamura; Toru Higaki; Shota Kondo; Ikuo Kawashita; Isao Takahashi; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  A New Frontier in Temporal Bone Imaging: Photon-Counting Detector CT Demonstrates Superior Visualization of Critical Anatomic Structures at Reduced Radiation Dose.

Authors:  J C Benson; K Rajendran; J I Lane; F E Diehn; N M Weber; J E Thorne; N B Larson; J G Fletcher; C H McCollough; S Leng
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Visualization of bone details in a novel photon-counting dual-source CT scanner-comparison with energy-integrating CT.

Authors:  Stefanie J Bette; Franziska M Braun; Mark Haerting; Josua A Decker; Jan H Luitjens; Christian Scheurig-Muenkler; Thomas J Kroencke; Florian Schwarz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 7.034

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.