Literature DB >> 33881401

Acceptance, Barriers, and Future Preferences of Mobile Health Among Patients Receiving Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Care: Paper-Based Survey in a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Felix Reinecke1, Florian Dittrich2,3, Marcel Dudda1, Andreas Stang4, Christina Polan1, Roman Müller1, Paula Beck1, Max Daniel Kauther1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smartphones have become an essential part of everyday life and it is undeniable that apps offer enormous opportunities for dealing with future challenges in public health. Nevertheless, the exact patient requirements for medical apps in the field of orthopedic and trauma surgery are currently unknown.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define target groups, evaluate patient requirements, and the potential and pitfalls regarding medical apps specific for patients receiving orthopedic and trauma surgical care.
METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted between August 2018 and December 2019 at a German trauma center and 3 trauma surgery/orthopedic practices. A paper-based survey consisting of 15 questions evaluated information regarding smartphone and medical app usage behavior. In addition, suggested app functions were rated using Likert scales. Descriptive statistics and binary log-binomial regression were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 1055 questionnaires were included in our statistical analysis. Approximately 89.57% (945/1055) of the patients in this study owned a smartphone. Smartphone ownership probability decreased with every decade of life and increased with higher levels of education. Medical information was obtained via mobile web access by 62.65% (661/1055) of the patients; this correlated with smartphone ownership in regard to age and educational level. Only 11.18% (118/1055) of the patients reported previous medical app usage, and 3.50% (37/1055) of the patients received an app recommendation from a physician. More than half (594/1055, 56.30%) of the patients were unwilling to pay for a medical app. The highest rated app functions were information about medication, behavioral guidelines, and medical record archival. An improved treatment experience was reported through the suggested app features by 71.18% (751/1055) of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Mobile devices are a widely used source of information for medical content, but only a minority of the population reported previous medical app usage. The main target group for medical apps among patients receiving orthopedic and trauma surgical care tends to be the younger population, which results in a danger of excluding fringe groups, especially the older adults. Education seems to be one of the most important pull factors to use smartphones or a mobile web connection to obtain health information. Medical apps primarily focusing on an optimized patient education and flow of information seem to have the potential to support patients in health issues, at least in their subjective perception. For future target group-oriented app developments, further evidence on the clinical application, feasibility, and acceptance of app usage are necessary in order to avoid patient endangerment and to limit socioeconomic costs. ©Felix Reinecke, Florian Dittrich, Marcel Dudda, Andreas Stang, Christina Polan, Roman Müller, Paula Beck, Max Daniel Kauther. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 21.04.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  app; mHealth; orthopedics; smartphone; trauma surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 33881401     DOI: 10.2196/23784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth        ISSN: 2291-5222            Impact factor:   4.773


  3 in total

1.  Orthopedic Telemedicine Outpatient Practice Diagnoses Set during the First COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown-Individual Observation.

Authors:  Wojciech Michał Glinkowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Patients' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Christine Jacob; Emre Sezgin; Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez; Chris Ivory
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.947

Review 3.  The Use of Mobile Applications for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Tumors in Orthopaedic Oncology - a Systematic Review.

Authors:  J Berger-Groch; M Keitsch; A Reiter; S Weiss; K H Frosch; M Priemel
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.460

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.