Literature DB >> 33880334

Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography improves the predictive ability of acute bilirubin encephalopathy.

Hesheng Chang1, Jing Zheng1, Jun Ju1, Shuxia Huang1, Xue Yang1, Runyu Tian1, Zunjie Liu2, Gaifen Liu3, Xuanguang Qin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To establish a clinical prediction model of acute bilirubin encephalopathy (ABE) using amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG).
METHODS: A total of 114 neonatal hyperbilirubinemia patients in the Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from August 2015 to October 2018 were enrolled in this study. There were 62 (54.38%) males, and the age of patients undergoing aEEG examination was 2-23 days, with an average of 7.61±4.08 days. Participant clinical information, peak bilirubin value, albumin value, hyperbilirubinemia, and the graphic indicators of aEEG were extracted from medical records, and ABE was diagnosed according to a bilirubin-induced neurological dysfunction (BIND) score >0. Multivariable logistic regression was used to establish a clinical prediction model of ABE. Furthermore, decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the model's predictive value.
RESULTS: According to the BIND score, there were a total of 23 (20.18%) ABE cases. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the value of bilirubin/albumin (B/A), presence of hyperbilirubinemia risk factors, number of sleep-wake cycling (SWC) within 3 hours, widest bandwidth, duration of SWC, and type of SWC were significantly associated with ABE. A clinical prediction model was developed as: p=ex/ (1+ex), X=0.278+0.713*B/A+2.602*with risk factors (with risk factors equals 1) - 1.500*SWC number within 3 hours + 0.219*the widest bandwidth-0.065*the duration of one SWC + 1.491* SWC (mature SWC equals 0, immature SWC equals 1). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.94], which was significantly higher than the AUC only based on conventional clinical information of B/A (AUC: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45-0.72). The DCA also showed good predictive ability compared to B/A.
CONCLUSIONS: A clinical prediction model can be established based on the patients' B/A, presence of risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia, number of SWC within 3 hours, widest bandwidth, duration of 1 SWC, and the type of SWC. It has good predictive ability and may improve the diagnostic accuracy of ABE. 2021 Translational Pediatrics. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplitude integrated electroencephalography; acute bilirubin encephalopathy (ABE); clinical prediction model

Year:  2021        PMID: 33880334      PMCID: PMC8041610          DOI: 10.21037/tp-21-35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Pediatr        ISSN: 2224-4336


Introduction

Acute bilirubin encephalopathy (ABE) is among the diseases that seriously endanger the development of nervous system for newborns (1). Its pathogenesis is mainly due to the deposition of bilirubin in the basal ganglia and its toxicity (2). Insufficient understanding of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia may lead to a missed opportunity of early diagnosis of ABE, which can cause severe neurological sequelae (1,3,4), such as abnormal hand and foot movement, auditory impairment, dental dysplasia and intellectual disability. Early detection and identification of bilirubin encephalopathy, and the timely prevention of irreversible brain damage plays a key role in the treatment. The diagnosis of ABE has remained controversial to date (1). At present, bilirubin-induced neurological dysfunction (BIND) scoring (5,6), cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (7) and auditory brainstem response (1,3,4) are the main methods for diagnosing ABE. However, they both have limitations in clinical application. The BIND score is highly subjective and requires long-term observation of patients (4). The high signal of T1 weighted image (T1WI) in the pallidal region is believed to be a hallmark of ABE (8). However, increased T1 signal in the pallidal region is also considered a transient phenomenon during the development of myelination, which lacks the specificity of diagnosis (9,10). Auditory brainstem response is also a well-known way of diagnosing ABE, but the relationship of serum bilirubin levels and auditory alterations is still not well defined. Thus the thresholds of blood bilirubin considered critical to the auditory impairment are not determined (11). Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a simplified continuous electroencephalography (EEG) recording method, which has the advantages of simple operation, ease of judging graphics, and long-term bedside operation (12). Findings have proved that aEEG changes can show early than photographic examinations, etc. (13). Numerous data on neonatal brain maturity can be obtained through quantitative reading and scoring of aEEG graphics (14). In recent years, aEEG has been widely used in various fields of neonatology, such as seizure detection (15,16), preterm infants (17,18), metabolic disorder (19), brain damage (20), and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (21,22). However, as a relatively new method of brain function monitoring, whether aEEG could be used to facilitate the early diagnosis of ABE is still unclear. Our study aimed to develop a clinical prediction model based on aEEG for the early detection of ABE, and evaluate its predictive ability added to conventional clinical information such as bilirubin/albumin (B/A) value. We present the following article in accordance with the TRIPOD reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-21-35).

Methods

Participants

A total of 114 neonates with hyperbilirubinemia admitted to the Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, from August 2015 to October 2018 were enrolled in the study. There were 62 (54.38%) males, and the age (in days) of undergoing aEEG examinations ranged from 2 to 23 days, with an average of 7.61±4.08 days. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (I) the peak serum total bilirubin level was higher than the 95th percentile of the hourly bilirubin line chart (14); (II) ≥35 weeks of gestation. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (I) presence of congenital craniocerebral dysplasia; (II) presence of neonatal ischemic hypoxic encephalopathy, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, viral encephalitis, and other diseases affecting the central nervous system; (III) presence of serious genetic metabolic disease. This study was approved by the Central Ethics Committee at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University (the approval No.2019-3-15-2). Written informed consent was signed by legally authorized representatives. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013).

Clinical data collection

These clinical data were extracted from medical records: gender, gestational week, weight, age (days) at aEEG examination, feeding (milk feeding, breastfeeding), risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia (with any of the following status: ABO hemolysis, other types of hemolysis, G-6PD deficiency, asphyxia, marked drowsiness, unstable body temperature, sepsis, metabolic acidosis, hypoalbuminemia), peak bilirubin, albumin value, B/A value (i.e., peak B/A value), and BIND Score.

Diagnosis of ABE

The diagnosis of ABE in this study was based on the BIND score, which was scored according to the patient’s mental state, muscle tone, and crying (shown in ). Each item was scored 0–3 points, and the total BIND score ranged from 0 to 9. A BIND score greater than 0 was diagnosed as ABE. The BIND score was evaluated by trained senior pediatric neurologists according to the standard operating procedure.
Table 1

The BIND scoring system

Weight for signs123
Mental statusToo sleepy; poor feedingVery poor feeding, marked lethargy or irritabilitySemi-coma; intermittent apnea; seizures
Muscle toneSlight but persistent decrease in toneModerate hyper or hypotonia depending on arousal state; posturing, bi-cycling; mild nuchal and truncal archingSevere hyper or hyotonia; opisthotonos; fever
CryHigh pitchedShrill and frequent or too frequentInconsolable or only with stimulation

BIND, bilirubin-induced neurological dysfunction.

BIND, bilirubin-induced neurological dysfunction.

Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography

The aEEG was operated and evaluated by trained specialized technicians according to the standard operating procedure with the Olympic Brainz Monitor and Neurofax tracing. The electrodes were placed in bilateral parietal bones. The distance between the 2 points of the electrodes was 75 mm. The midpoint of the 2-point line was 50 mm posterior to the center of the head, and the reference electrode was placed 25 mm anterior to the center of the head. The participant was continuously monitored for at least 3 hours. The following parameters were monitored and measured: (I) background continuity: continuous normal voltage was defined as lower boundary voltage >5 µV, upper boundary voltage >10 µV; discontinuous normal voltage was defined as lower boundary voltage <5 µV, upper boundary voltage >10 µV. (II) The type of SWC (23): mature indicated that both upper and lower boundaries had obvious periodic fluctuations (); immature included unclear (i.e., the lower boundary was visible, but the upper boundary was not obvious or step-like, as shown in ); easy to be interrupted (i.e., the lower boundary could be seen, but the cycle was poor as shown in ); none indicated both the upper and lower boundaries were not visible, as shown in . (III) The length of one SWC. (IV) The number of SWC within 3 hours. (V) The lower boundary voltage. (VI) The bandwidth: the range between the highest upper boundary voltage and the lowest lower boundary voltage within 3 hours. (VII) The widest bandwidth during quiet sleep. (VIII) The narrowest bandwidth during active sleep. (IX) The proportion of broadband time in one SWC. (X) The proportion of narrowband time in one SWC.
Figure 1

aEEG recording with mature SWC. Both upper and lower boundaries have obvious periodic fluctuations. aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; SWC, sleep-wake cycling.

Figure 2

aEEG recording with immature SWC (non-obvious upper boundary). The lower boundary is visible, but the upper boundary is not obvious. aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; SWC, sleep-wake cycling.

Figure 3

aEEG recording with immature SWC (poor cycles). The lower boundary can be seen, but the SWC cycle is poor. aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; SWC, sleep-wake cycling.

Figure 4

aEEG recording with none SWC. Both the upper and lower boundaries were not visible. aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; SWC, sleep-wake cycling.

aEEG recording with mature SWC. Both upper and lower boundaries have obvious periodic fluctuations. aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; SWC, sleep-wake cycling. aEEG recording with immature SWC (non-obvious upper boundary). The lower boundary is visible, but the upper boundary is not obvious. aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; SWC, sleep-wake cycling. aEEG recording with immature SWC (poor cycles). The lower boundary can be seen, but the SWC cycle is poor. aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; SWC, sleep-wake cycling. aEEG recording with none SWC. Both the upper and lower boundaries were not visible. aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; SWC, sleep-wake cycling.

Statistical analysis

We used percentage for categorical variables and mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. To compare categorical variables, we used a chi-square (χ2) test. For comparing continuous variables, we used the t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression was used to investigate the factors associated with ABE and establish the clinical prediction model. Area under the curve (AUC) from the C-statistic was used to evaluate the predictive ability. A C-statistic of 1.0 indicated a perfect prediction, whereas a C-statistic of 0.5 indicated that the prediction did not differ from a random prediction. Calibration was assessed using Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) goodness-of-fit χ2 test. The analysis was performed using the statistical software SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and STATA15 (StataCorp LLC. College Station, TX, USA). Finally, the decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to evaluate the model using R 3.6.1 software (https://www.R-project.org/).

Results

Participant characteristics

Among the 114 neonates with hyperbilirubinemia, 23 were diagnosed as ABE according to the BIND score, with a prevalence of 20.18%. No significant differences were found among participants regarding gender, age undergoing aEEG, and other factors except weight between the ABE and non-ABE patients (shown in ). The maturation of SWC, duration of 1 SWC, and number of cycles within 3 hours were significantly different between the ABE and non-ABE participants ().
Table 2

The clinical characteristics of patients with and without ABE

FactorsTotal (n=114)ABE (n=23)Non-ABE (n=91)P value
Male62 (54.4%)14 (60.9%)48 (52.7%)0.64
Gestational week (day)271.89±9.52273.26±9.97271.55±9.430.44
Weight (g)3,300.53±435.873,520.65±547.633,244.89±386.920.006
Age undergoing aEEG (days)7.61±4.087±5.127.76±3.790.43
Feeding method0.99
   Milk feeding55 (48.2%)11 (47.8%)44 (48.4%)
   Breast feeding59 (51.8%)12 (52.2%)47 (51.6%)
With risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia9 (7.9%)4 (17.4%)5 (5.5%)0.08
Peak bilirubin value362.64±62.76379.99±78.21358.25±57.910.14
Albumin value36.20±2.7035.76±3.0036.31±2.620.39
B/A5.87±0.986.20±1.155.78±0.920.07

With risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia included anyone of the following status: ABO hemolysis, other types of hemolysis, G-6PD deficiency, asphyxia, marked drowsiness, unstable body temperature, sepsis, metabolic acidosis, hypoalbuminemia. ABE, acute bilirubin encephalopathy; aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography.

Table 3

The aEEG characteristics of patients with and without ABE

FactorsTotal (n=114)ABE (n=23)Non-ABE (n=91)P value
Background continuity0.77
   CNV101 (88.6%)20 (87.0%)81 (89.0%)
   DC13 (11.4%)3 (13.0%)10 (11.0%)
SWC0.009
   Mature48 (42.1%)4 (17.4%)44 (48.4%)
   Immature66 (57.9%)19 (82.6%)47 (51.6%)
Duration of one SWC68.68±19.4360.00±28.7670.88±15.730.016
Number of SWC within 3 hours2.47±0.732.20±1.062.54±0.610.04
Lower boundary voltage5.63±1.235.87±1.465.57±1.170.03
Bandwidth24.49±7.0827.04±8.5123.855±6.570.05
Widest bandwidth17.46±5.0417.57±8.6717.43±3.670.91
Narrowest bandwidth7.00±2.647.13±4.416.97±1.990.79
Proportion of broadband time in one SWC0.33±0.110.31±0.170.34±0.080.24

aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; ABE, acute bilirubin encephalopathy; CNV, continuous normal voltage; DC, discontinuous normal voltage; SWC, sleep-wake cycling.

With risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia included anyone of the following status: ABO hemolysis, other types of hemolysis, G-6PD deficiency, asphyxia, marked drowsiness, unstable body temperature, sepsis, metabolic acidosis, hypoalbuminemia. ABE, acute bilirubin encephalopathy; aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography. aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; ABE, acute bilirubin encephalopathy; CNV, continuous normal voltage; DC, discontinuous normal voltage; SWC, sleep-wake cycling.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis of risk factors for ABE

Multivariable stepwise logistics regression analysis showed that B/A, with risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia, the number of SWC within 3 hours, widest bandwidth, duration of 1 SWC, and type of SWC were significantly associated with ABE (). The clinical prediction model was finally developed as: p=ex/ (1+ex), X=0.278+0.713*B/A+2.602*with risk factors (with risk factors equals 1) − 1.500*SWC number within 3 hours+0.219*the widest bandwidth-0.065*the duration of one SWC + 1.491*SWC (mature SWC equals 0, immature SWC equals 1).
Table 4

Multivariate stepwise logistic analysis of 114 cases of hyperbilirubinemia

βSEP value
B/A0.7130.3460.04
With risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia2.6020.9590.007
Number of SWC within 3 hours−1.5000.7280.04
Widest bandwidth0.2190.0680.001
Duration of one SWC−0.0650.0270.02
SWC1.4910.6720.03

β, adjusted regression coefficient; SE, standard error; B/A, bilirubin/albumin value; SWC, sleep-wake cycling.

β, adjusted regression coefficient; SE, standard error; B/A, bilirubin/albumin value; SWC, sleep-wake cycling.

Evaluation of clinical prediction model

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the AUC was 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75–0.94] (), and the HL test indicated a P value of 0.53. The AUC was significantly higher than the AUC of the model with only the conventional clinical variable of B/A (AUC: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45–0.72) (P=0.0003).
Figure 5

ROC curve comparison between the model of B/A and the model established in the study. The AUC of this clinical prediction model was significantly higher than the AUC of the model with only the conventional clinical variable of B/A. (AUC: 0.85 vs. 0.58, P=0.0003). ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

ROC curve comparison between the model of B/A and the model established in the study. The AUC of this clinical prediction model was significantly higher than the AUC of the model with only the conventional clinical variable of B/A. (AUC: 0.85 vs. 0.58, P=0.0003). ROC, receiver operating characteristic. The DCA curve showed that the clinical prediction model established has a high clinical prediction value at the threshold of 0.2–1.0, which had a significant prediction advantage over the B/A model ().
Figure 6

DCA curve. Red line shows the predictive value of B/A, green line shows the predictive value of the prediction model established in this study. This figure shows that the clinical prediction model established has a higher clinical prediction value at the threshold of 0.2–1.0, vs. the B/A model. DCA, decision curve analysis.

DCA curve. Red line shows the predictive value of B/A, green line shows the predictive value of the prediction model established in this study. This figure shows that the clinical prediction model established has a higher clinical prediction value at the threshold of 0.2–1.0, vs. the B/A model. DCA, decision curve analysis.

Discussion

This study performed in-depth analysis of the graphic indicators of aEEG, and developed a clinical prediction model of ABE based on aEEG, which significantly improved the predictive ability of ABE compared to the model based on only the conventional clinical information. Previous brain function monitoring could only identify the occurrence of brain injury (18,23), but the identification of the different types of brain injury disease often depends on imaging such as cranial nuclear magnetic resonance. However, the accuracy of MRI in diagnosing ABE is still controversial. Since normal myelination can also show different manifestations on images while under developing stage (10), it is difficult to discriminate the differences between diseased and normal myelination (24). Similarly, conventional brain function monitoring for neonates with hyperbilirubinemia cannot determine the occurrence of ABE, because it is still unknown which degree of brain dysfunction or kind of specific graphic characteristics are associated with bilirubin encephalopathy. The pathogenesis of ABE is that bilirubin is deposited in the basal ganglia (2,25), where the aEEG monitoring area (12) locates. Studies in animal models have shown the vulnerable regions of bilirubin encephalopathy were cerebellum, cochlea, oculomotor nucleus, basal ganglia, and hippocampus (25). The hypothalamus globus pallidus loop is closely related to the electrical activity of cortical neurons, and they both participate in the maintenance of the sleep-wake cycle (26). Thus, EEG activity change in the acute phase of bilirubin encephalopathy has its corresponding neuropathological basis. Therefore, we hypothesized that aEEG may play a role in the diagnosis or prediction of ABE; in other words, ABE may have its special graphical characteristics of aEEG. In our study, we included all known aEEG monitoring indicators in combination with conventional clinical information including B/A and risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia. Using multivariable stepwise logistic regression, we developed a clinical predictive model for ABE, which included the following variables: the type of SWC, SWC duration, number of SWC within 3 hours, widest bandwidth, B/A value, and risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia. This clinical predictive model showed an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75–0.94), which was significantly higher than the AUC based only on conventional clinical information of B/A value (AUC: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45–0.72). We found that the graphic indicators of SWC and amplitude may be the most sensitive variables, which is in line with findings in previous studies which reported these factors as closely related to central nervous system maturation (14,26-28). Sleep is an important neurological activity in the neonatal period. The observation of neonatal SWC can assist early detection of nerve function injury induced by bilirubin, and further analyze the brain function characteristics of ABE. Abnormalities in SWC may be manifested as delayed onset, reduced, or absence of existing SWC. The disappearance or disorder of normal sleep cycle is a serious EEG abnormality, presenting as reductions in both SWC duration and number of SWC within 3 hours. Structure of SWC can also be changed, some studies showed that the quiet sleep period ratio decreased, accordingly the active sleep period ratio increased (29). Our study did not reveal this feature, but showed a pattern of changes with the SWC structure increase of the widest bandwidth. This increase in amplitude is contrary to the brain maturation process, suggesting a correlation with bilirubin toxicity. Previous studies have reported B/A value as a predictor for bilirubin encephalopathy (29,30), with higher total B/A ratio increasing the risk of bilirubin encephalopathy by 23% (odds ratio: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.16–2.48). Our clinical prediction model, which added graphic indicators of aEEG to B/A value, significantly improved the predictive ability. In clinical work, diagnosing neonatal bilirubin encephalopathy quickly and accurately is critical for creating a treatment strategy and prognostic evaluation. Currently, aEEG is the best tool for assessing the brain functional status of newborns (13). It can quickly and accurately assess the degree of brain damage in newborns, but it still lacks specific evaluation indicators. Moreover, it cannot provide evidence which is strong enough to assess the bilirubin encephalopathy based on aEEG alone. The establishment of the clinical prediction model in this study provided a convenient and effective clinical application tool for early identification and judgment of the occurrence of ABE. The AUC of this prediction model was 0.85, which showed a high predictive value. Our study had some limitations. In this study, neonates with ABE treated in our hospital were mainly mild cases and only a few severe cases were included. The predictive ability of this model for neonates with severe ABE needs to be further evaluated, including the effect of seizures and other specific severe aEEG changes Furthermore, this model needs external validation in a multi-center study. In future work, we will perform a multicenter, larger-sample, and prospective cohort study to validate this clinical prediction model, and to evaluate its predictive value for long-term prognosis of neonatal ABE. Survivors of ABE infants will be follow-up and evaluated through multiple measurements, including the magnetic resonance image, auditory brainstem response, Denver Development Screening Test and etc. Besides, the predictive and diagnosing value of aEEG on preterm or full-term infants as well as hyperbilirubinemia will also be studied in our future studies. In summary, this study developed a clinical prediction model with good predictive ability for ABE based on aEEG, which is of great significance for the early detection and diagnosis of ABE. However, it needs to be further validated in a future multi-center study. The article’s supplementary files as
  30 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of normal myelination with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kirk M Welker; Alice Patton
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.420

Review 2.  How to use: amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG).

Authors:  Nidhi Agrawal Shah; Courtney Jane Wusthoff
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 1.309

3.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormalities in Advanced Acute Bilirubin Encephalopathy Highlight Dentato-Thalamo-Cortical Pathways.

Authors:  Jessica L Wisnowski; Ashok Panigrahy; Michael J Painter; Jon F Watchko
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Early amplitude-integrated electroencephalography for monitoring neonates at high risk for brain injury.

Authors:  Gabriel Fernando Todeschi Variane; Maurício Magalhães; Renato Gasperine; Heitor Castelo Branco Rodrigues Alves; Thiago Luiz Pereira Donoso Scoppetta; Rodrigo de Jesus Gonçalves Figueredo; Francisco Paulo Martins Rodrigues; Alexandre Netto; Marcelo Jenne Mimica; Clery Bernardi Gallacci
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.197

Review 5.  Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography for seizure detection in newborn infants.

Authors:  Lena Hellström-Westas
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Cerebral function monitoring: a new scoring system for the evaluation of brain maturation in neonates.

Authors:  Vladimir F Burdjalov; Stephen Baumgart; Alan R Spitzer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Sleep-wake cycle on amplitude-integrated EEG and neuroimage outcomes in newborns.

Authors:  Seonkyeong Rhie; Kyu Young Chae; Heui Seung Jo; Kyu Hyung Lee
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography for Early Diagnosis and Prognostic Prediction of Hypoxic Encephalopathy in Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Xia Zhu; Yingmeng Guo; Yuanjuan Liu; Kemiao Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 9.  Sleep Disturbances in Newborns.

Authors:  Daphna Yasova Barbeau; Michael D Weiss
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-20

10.  Increased serum total bilirubin-albumin ratio was associated with bilirubin encephalopathy in neonates.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Guangyao Sheng; Lina Shi; Xiuyong Cheng
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Establishment and Evaluation of Influencing Factors and Risk Prediction Model of Severe Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia Complicated with Acute Bilirubin Encephalopathy.

Authors:  Shanshan Jiang; Xiaoxiao Li; Ling Wang; Tingting Lin; Tao Qin
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.650

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.