Literature DB >> 33880066

Development of a Joint Prediction Model Based on Both the Radiomics and Clinical Factors for Predicting the Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Yang Liu1, Feng-Jiao Zhang2, Xi-Xi Zhao3, Yuan Yang4, Chun-Yi Liang3, Li-Li Feng5, Xiang-Bo Wan5, Yi Ding1, Yao-Wei Zhang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) has become the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, the accuracy of traditional clinical indicators in predicting tumor response is poor. Recently, radiomics based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been regarded as a promising noninvasive assessment method. The present study was conducted to develop a model to predict the pathological response by analyzing the quantitative features of MRI and clinical risk factors, which might predict the therapeutic effects in patients with LARC as accurately as possible before treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 82 patients with LARC were enrolled as the training cohort and internal validation cohort. The pre-CRT MRI after pretreatment was acquired to extract texture features, which was finally selected through the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) algorithm. A support vector machine (SVM) was used as a classifier to classify different tumor responses. A joint radiomics model combined with clinical risk factors was then developed and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. External validation was performed with 107 patients from another center to evaluate the applicability of the model.
RESULTS: Twenty top image texture features were extracted from 6192 extracted-radiomic features. The radiomics model based on high-spatial-resolution T2-weighted imaging (HR-T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1+C) demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8910 (0.8114-0.9706) and 0.8938 (0.8084-0.9792), respectively. The AUC value rose to 0.9371 (0.8751-0.9997) and 0.9113 (0.8449-0.9776), respectively, when the circumferential resection margin (CRM) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels were incorporated. Clinical usefulness was confirmed in an external validation cohort as well (AUC, 0.6413 and 0.6818).
CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that the joint radiomics prediction model combined with clinical risk factors showed good predictive ability regarding the treatment response of tumors as accurately as possible before treatment.
© 2021 Liu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnetic resonance imaging; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; rectal cancer; tumor response

Year:  2021        PMID: 33880066      PMCID: PMC8053518          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S295317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


  41 in total

Review 1.  Rapid review: radiomics and breast cancer.

Authors:  Francesca Valdora; Nehmat Houssami; Federica Rossi; Massimo Calabrese; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study.

Authors:  Maxime J M van der Valk; Denise E Hilling; Esther Bastiaannet; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Geerard L Beets; Nuno L Figueiredo; Angelita Habr-Gama; Rodrigo O Perez; Andrew G Renehan; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Radiomics Analysis for Evaluation of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zhenyu Liu; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Yan-Jie Shi; Lin Wang; Hai-Tao Zhu; Zhenchao Tang; Shuo Wang; Xiao-Ting Li; Jie Tian; Ying-Shi Sun
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Predicting the tumor response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: Model development and external validation using MRI radiomics.

Authors:  Philippe Bulens; Alice Couwenberg; Martijn Intven; Annelies Debucquoy; Vincent Vandecaveye; Eric Van Cutsem; André D'Hoore; Albert Wolthuis; Pritam Mukherjee; Olivier Gevaert; Karin Haustermans
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 5.  Advances and challenges in treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Joshua Smith; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yan-Qi Huang; Chang-Hong Liang; Lan He; Jie Tian; Cui-Shan Liang; Xin Chen; Ze-Lan Ma; Zai-Yi Liu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Long-term Outcome of an Organ Preservation Program After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Milou H Martens; Monique Maas; Luc A Heijnen; Doenja M J Lambregts; Jeroen W A Leijtens; Laurents P S Stassen; Stephanie O Breukink; Christiaan Hoff; Eric J Belgers; Jarno Melenhorst; Rob Jansen; Jeroen Buijsen; Ton G M Hoofwijk; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Geerard L Beets
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  J E Ryan; S K Warrier; A C Lynch; R G Ramsay; W A Phillips; A G Heriot
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Radiomic Texture and Shape Descriptors of the Rectal Environment on Post-Chemoradiation T2-Weighted MRI are Associated with Pathologic Tumor Stage Regression in Rectal Cancers: A Retrospective, Multi-Institution Study.

Authors:  Charlems Alvarez-Jimenez; Jacob T Antunes; Nitya Talasila; Kaustav Bera; Justin T Brady; Jayakrishna Gollamudi; Eric Marderstein; Matthew F Kalady; Andrei Purysko; Joseph E Willis; Sharon Stein; Kenneth Friedman; Rajmohan Paspulati; Conor P Delaney; Eduardo Romero; Anant Madabhushi; Satish E Viswanath
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Study protocol: multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for therapeutic response prediction in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Trang Thanh Pham; Gary Liney; Karen Wong; Robba Rai; Mark Lee; Daniel Moses; Christopher Henderson; Michael Lin; Joo-Shik Shin; Michael Bernard Barton
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

1.  Delta radiomics: a systematic review.

Authors:  Valerio Nardone; Alfonso Reginelli; Roberta Grassi; Luca Boldrini; Giovanna Vacca; Emma D'Ippolito; Salvatore Annunziata; Alessandra Farchione; Maria Paola Belfiore; Isacco Desideri; Salvatore Cappabianca
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Predicting Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning: Evaluation of MRI-Based Radiomic and Clinical Models.

Authors:  Kent J Peterson; Matthew T Simpson; Melissa K Drezdzon; Aniko Szabo; Robin A Ausman; Andrew S Nencka; Paul M Knechtges; Carrie Y Peterson; Kirk A Ludwig; Timothy J Ridolfi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  A nomogram for predicting good response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective, double-center, cohort study.

Authors:  Guancong Wang; Zhifang Zheng; Jinhua Chen; Jiahong Ye; Zihan Tang; Yicong Fang; Kaiyuan Yao; Qunzhang Zeng; Yugang Yang; Haiwen Tang; Bijuan Lin; Yincong Guo; Ying Huang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 2.796

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.