| Literature DB >> 33879749 |
Yanwei You1, Jianxiu Liu1, Meihua Tang2, Dizhi Wang1, Xindong Ma1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It remains unclear whether Tai Chi is effective for walking function and posture control improvements in aged populations with knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effects of Tai Chi on improving walking function and posture control in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis by updating the latest trial evidence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33879749 PMCID: PMC8078456 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Flow chart of study selection and identification.
Overview of the characteristics of the included studies.
| First authors, year, country | Sample size | Age (range) or mean-SD (yr) | Sex, F/M | Duration weeks | Outcome assessments tools | Experimental group intervention | Control group intervention | Frequency (min or h/session per/wk) |
| Hartman (2000)[ | 35 | 67 ± 8 | 30/5 | 12 | TUG Test | Yang-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 60 min/2 wk |
| Fransen (2007)[ | 97 | 70 ± 6.3 | 72/25 | 12 | TUG Test/WOMAC Physical Function Score | Sun-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 60 min/2 wk |
| Brismée (2007)[ | 41 | 70 ± 9.2 | 34/7 | 12 | WOMAC Physical Function Score | Yang-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 40 min/3 wk |
| Wang (2009)[ | 40 | 65 ± 7.8 | 30/10 | 12 | 6 MWT/WOMAC Physical Function Score | Yang-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 60 min/2 wk |
| Lee (2009)[ | 44 | 69 ± 5 | 41/3 | 8 | 6 MWT/WOMAC Physical Function Score | Yang-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 60 min/2 wk |
| Wortley (2013)[ | 31 | 70 ± 5 | 22/9 | 10 | 6 MWT/TUG Test/WOMAC Physical Function Score | Yang-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 60 min/3 wk |
| Tsai (2013)[ | 55 | 78.9 ± 7.6 | 40/15 | 20 | TUG Test | Sun-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 20–40 min/3 wk |
| Zhu (2016)[ | 46 | 64.6 ± 3.4 | 46/0 | 24 | WOMAC Physical Function Score | Yang-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 60 min/2 wk |
| Lü (2017)[ | 46 | 64.6 ± 3.42 | 46/0 | 24 | TUG Test | Yang-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 60 min/3 wk |
| Li.L (2019)[ | 107 | 69.1 ± 3.9 | 57/50 | 12 | 6 MWT/WOMAC Physical Function Score | Yang-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 45 min/5 wk |
| Li.J (2019)[ | 61 | 65.9 ± 5.8 | 23/38 | 16 | 6 MWT/TUG Test/WOMAC Physical Function Score | Yang-style Tai Chi | Attention control | 60 min/3 wk |
Methodological quality assessment of included studies.
| Blinding | |||||||
| Studies | Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Participants, personnel | Assessors | Incomplete Outcome data (attrition bias) | Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Other bias |
| Hartman (2000)[ | L | L | H | H | U | L | U |
| Fransen (2007)[ | L | L | H | H | U | L | U |
| Brismée (2007)[ | L | L | H | H | H | U | U |
| Wang (2009)[ | L | L | H | H | U | L | U |
| Lee (2009)[ | L | L | H | H | U | L | U |
| Wortley (2013)[ | U | U | H | H | L | U | U |
| Tsai (2013)[ | L | L | H | H | L | L | U |
| Zhu (2016)[ | L | L | H | H | L | L | U |
| Lü (2017)[ | L | L | H | H | U | L | U |
| Li L (2019)[ | L | L | H | H | L | L | U |
| Li J (2019)[ | L | L | H | H | U | L | U |
Figure 2Risk of bias of the included studies (n = 11).
Figure 3Summary of the risk of bias. The overall risk of bias, except for blinding (performance bias), was low.
Figure 4Forest plot showing the effect of Tai Chi on the 6 MWT in individuals with knee OA.
Figure 5Forest plot showing the effect of Tai Chi on the TUG test in individuals with knee OA.
Figure 6Forest plot showing the effect of Tai Chi on the WOMAC Physical Function Score in individuals with knee OA.