| Literature DB >> 33879620 |
Michael Schon1, Catherine Baxter2, Congyao Xu2, Balaji Enugutti1, Michael D Nodine3,4, Caroline Dean5.
Abstract
Quantitative variation in expression of the Arabidopsis floral repressor FLC influences whether plants overwinter before flowering, or have a rapid cycling habit enabling multiple generations a year. Genetic analysis has identified activators and repressors of FLC expression but how they interact to set expression level is poorly understood. Here, we show that antagonistic functions of the FLC activator FRIGIDA (FRI) and the repressor FCA, at a specific stage of embryo development, determine FLC expression and flowering. FRI antagonizes an FCA-induced proximal polyadenylation to increase FLC expression and delay flowering. Sector analysis shows that FRI activity during the early heart stage of embryo development maximally delays flowering. Opposing functions of cotranscriptional regulators during an early embryonic developmental window thus set FLC expression levels and determine flowering time.Entities:
Keywords: Arabidopsis FLC; cotranscriptional regulation; embryogenesis; sector analysis; transcript isoforms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33879620 PMCID: PMC8092400 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2102753118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.FLC polyadenylation site usage changes during embryo development. (A, Top) Distribution of reads with untemplated 3′-terminal poly(A) sequences across eight timepoints of embryo development and grouped into clusters. (A, Middle) Transcript models corresponding to full-length (distal) FLC and proximally polyadenylated (proximal) FLC. (A, Bottom) Mean RNA-seq read coverage at FLC from three biological replicates at eight embryo stages. (B) Mean transcripts per million (TPM) of FLC across the embryonic time series. (C) Poly(A) reads per million (RPM) contained in proximal and distal poly(A) clusters, respectively. (D) Differential gene expression between Col FRI and Col-0 embryos; genes more than twofold significantly higher (green) or lower (orange) in Col FRI embryos are marked (adjusted P value <10−3, DEseq2). (E) Estimated abundance of proximal and distal FLC isoforms in three biological replicates of Col-0, 35S::FCA, and Col FRI early heart embryos. (F) Distal:proximal poly(A) ratio in the same samples as in E, calculated as log2[proximal poly(A) RPM/distal poly(A) RPM].
Fig. 2.Induction of FRIGIDA sectors during embryogenesis and influence on flowering time. (A) Schematic of the 35S:lox-GUS-lox-FRI-GFP construct before and after heatshock. (B) GUS staining in a mosaic plant heat shocked as a 2-d-old seedling. (C) Flowering time assessed by final leaf number in plants that were heat shocked at different stages of embryo development. White bars, plants with FRI-expressing sectors covering all leaves; hatched bars, plants with FRI-expressing sectors and FRI-lacking sectors; black bars, plants with no FRI-expressing sectors. Shaded regions show the range of control plants: Columbia-0 (fri) or plants transformed with an active FRI allele. (D) Leaf number at flowering of 35S:lox-GUS-lox-FRI-GFP plants heat shocked as 2-d-old seedlings for 30 min. Control ranges are shaded as in C.