Literature DB >> 33879488

Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses' judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review.

Carmen J E M van der Mark1,2, Hester Vermeulen2,3, Paul H J Hendriks4, Catharina J van Oostveen5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Matching demand and supply in nursing work continues to generate debate. Current approaches focus on objective measures, such as nurses per occupied bed or patient classification. However, staff numbers do not tell the whole staffing story. The subjective measure of nurses' perceived adequacy of staffing (PAS) has the potential to enhance nurse staffing methods in a way that goes beyond traditional workload measurement or workforce planning methods.
OBJECTIVES: To detect outcomes associated with nurses' PAS and the factors that influence PAS and to review the psychometric properties of instruments used to measure PAS in a hospital setting. DESIGN AND METHODS: A scoping review was performed to identify outcomes associated with PAS, factors influencing PAS and instruments measuring PAS. A search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Business Source Complete and Embase databases identified 2609 potentially relevant articles. Data were independently extracted, analysed and synthesised. The quality of studies describing influencing factors or outcomes of PAS and psychometric properties of instruments measuring PAS were assessed following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality appraisal checklist and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines.
RESULTS: Sixty-three studies were included, describing 60 outcomes of PAS, 79 factors influencing PAS and 21 instruments measuring PAS. In general, positive PAS was related to positive outcomes for the patient, nurse and organisation, supporting the relevance of PAS as a staffing measure. We identified a variety of factors that influence PAS, including demand for care, nurse supply and organisation of care delivery. Associations between these factors and PAS were inconsistent. The quality of studies investigating the development and evaluation of instruments measuring PAS was moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the PAS may enhance nurse staffing methods in a hospital setting. Further work is needed to refine and psychometrically evaluate instruments for measuring PAS. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health economics; human resource management; organisation of health services; organisational development; quality in health care

Year:  2021        PMID: 33879488     DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

1.  Defining nursing workload predictors: A pilot study.

Authors:  Dhurata Ivziku; Federica Maria Pia Ferramosca; Lucia Filomeno; Raffaella Gualandi; Maddalena De Maria; Daniela Tartaglini
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 4.680

Review 2.  Defining adequacy of staffing in general hospital wards: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Carmen J E M van der Mark; Jocelynn Kraan; Paul H J Hendriks; Hester Vermeulen; Catharina J van Oostveen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Sufficient informed consent to medical treatment of adults: legal and ethical perspectives from Malawi.

Authors:  Eva Maria Mfutso Bengo; Adamson Muula; Joseph Mfutso Bengo
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.413

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.