Song Guo1, Shuyun Huang2, Xi Jiang2, Haiyang Hu2, Dingding Han2, Carlos S Moreno3, Genevieve L Fairbrother4, David A Hughes5,6, Mark Stoneking7, Philipp Khaitovich8. 1. Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 121205, Moscow, Russia. 2. CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, CAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, CAS, 320 Yue Yang Road, Shanghai, 200031, China. 3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. 4. Obstetrics and Gynecology of Atlanta, 1100 Johnson Ferry Rd NE Suite 800, Center 2, Atlanta, GA, 30342, USA. 5. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK. 6. Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK. 7. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. stonekg@eva.mpg.de. 8. Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 121205, Moscow, Russia. khaitovich@eva.mpg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Analysis of lymphocyte cell lines revealed substantial differences in the expression of mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) among human populations. The extent of such population-associated differences in actual human tissues remains largely unexplored. The placenta is one of the few solid human tissues that can be collected in substantial numbers in a controlled manner, enabling quantitative analysis of transient biomolecules such as RNA transcripts. Here, we analyzed microRNA (miRNA) expression in human placental samples derived from 36 individuals representing four genetically distinct human populations: African Americans, European Americans, South Asians, and East Asians. All samples were collected at the same hospital following a unified protocol, thus minimizing potential biases that might influence the results. RESULTS: Sequence analysis of the miRNA fraction yielded 938 annotated and 70 novel miRNA transcripts expressed in the placenta. Of them, 82 (9%) of annotated and 11 (16%) of novel miRNAs displayed quantitative expression differences among populations, generally reflecting reported genetic and mRNA-expression-based distances. Several co-expressed miRNA clusters stood out from the rest of the population-associated differences in terms of miRNA evolutionary age, tissue-specificity, and disease-association characteristics. Among three non-environmental influenced demographic parameters, the second largest contributor to miRNA expression variation after population was the sex of the newborn, with 32 miRNAs (3% of detected) exhibiting significant expression differences depending on whether the newborn was male or female. Male-associated miRNAs were evolutionarily younger and correlated inversely with the expression of target mRNA involved in neuron-related functions. In contrast, both male and female-associated miRNAs appeared to mediate different types of hormonal responses. Demographic factors further affected reported imprinted expression of 66 placental miRNAs: the imprinting strength correlated with the mother's weight, but not height. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that among 12 assessed demographic variables, population affiliation and fetal sex had a substantial influence on miRNA expression variation among human placental samples. The effect of newborn-sex-associated miRNA differences further led to expression inhibition of the target genes clustering in specific functional pathways. By contrast, population-driven miRNA differences might mainly represent neutral changes with minimal functional impacts.
BACKGROUND: Analysis of lymphocyte cell lines revealed substantial differences in the expression of mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) among human populations. The extent of such population-associated differences in actual human tissues remains largely unexplored. The placenta is one of the few solid human tissues that can be collected in substantial numbers in a controlled manner, enabling quantitative analysis of transient biomolecules such as RNA transcripts. Here, we analyzed microRNA (miRNA) expression in human placental samples derived from 36 individuals representing four genetically distinct human populations: African Americans, European Americans, South Asians, and East Asians. All samples were collected at the same hospital following a unified protocol, thus minimizing potential biases that might influence the results. RESULTS: Sequence analysis of the miRNA fraction yielded 938 annotated and 70 novel miRNA transcripts expressed in the placenta. Of them, 82 (9%) of annotated and 11 (16%) of novel miRNAs displayed quantitative expression differences among populations, generally reflecting reported genetic and mRNA-expression-based distances. Several co-expressed miRNA clusters stood out from the rest of the population-associated differences in terms of miRNA evolutionary age, tissue-specificity, and disease-association characteristics. Among three non-environmental influenced demographic parameters, the second largest contributor to miRNA expression variation after population was the sex of the newborn, with 32 miRNAs (3% of detected) exhibiting significant expression differences depending on whether the newborn was male or female. Male-associated miRNAs were evolutionarily younger and correlated inversely with the expression of target mRNA involved in neuron-related functions. In contrast, both male and female-associated miRNAs appeared to mediate different types of hormonal responses. Demographic factors further affected reported imprinted expression of 66 placental miRNAs: the imprinting strength correlated with the mother's weight, but not height. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that among 12 assessed demographic variables, population affiliation and fetal sex had a substantial influence on miRNA expression variation among human placental samples. The effect of newborn-sex-associated miRNA differences further led to expression inhibition of the target genes clustering in specific functional pathways. By contrast, population-driven miRNA differences might mainly represent neutral changes with minimal functional impacts.
Entities:
Keywords:
Human; Imprinting; Newborn; Placenta; Populations; Sexual dimorphism; miRNA
Authors: Barbara E Stranger; Matthew S Forrest; Mark Dunning; Catherine E Ingle; Claude Beazley; Natalie Thorne; Richard Redon; Christine P Bird; Anna de Grassi; Charles Lee; Chris Tyler-Smith; Nigel Carter; Stephen W Scherer; Simon Tavaré; Panagiotis Deloukas; Matthew E Hurles; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis Journal: Science Date: 2007-02-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Lucas T Husquin; Maxime Rotival; Maud Fagny; Hélène Quach; Nora Zidane; Lisa M McEwen; Julia L MacIsaac; Michael S Kobor; Hugues Aschard; Etienne Patin; Lluis Quintana-Murci Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Jing Guo; Yang Wu; Zhihong Zhu; Zhili Zheng; Maciej Trzaskowski; Jian Zeng; Matthew R Robinson; Peter M Visscher; Jian Yang Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: P Daca-Roszak; M Swierniak; R Jaksik; T Tyszkiewicz; M Oczko-Wojciechowska; J Zebracka-Gala; B Jarzab; M Witt; E Zietkiewicz Journal: BMC Genet Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 2.797
Authors: Amy E Flowers; Tania L Gonzalez; Nikhil V Joshi; Laura E Eisman; Ekaterina L Clark; Rae A Buttle; Erica Sauro; Rosemarie DiPentino; Yayu Lin; Di Wu; Yizhou Wang; Chintda Santiskulvong; Jie Tang; Bora Lee; Tianyanxin Sun; Jessica L Chan; Erica T Wang; Caroline Jefferies; Kate Lawrenson; Yazhen Zhu; Yalda Afshar; Hsian-Rong Tseng; John Williams; Margareta D Pisarska Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2022-03-19 Impact factor: 4.161
Authors: Amy E Braun; Olivia R Mitchel; Tania L Gonzalez; Tianyanxin Sun; Amy E Flowers; Margareta D Pisarska; Virginia D Winn Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 8.811