Literature DB >> 33877881

A Phenotypic Comparison of Loudness and Pain Hyperacusis: Symptoms, Comorbidity, and Associated Features in a Multinational Patient Registry.

Zachary J Williams1,2,3,4, Evan Suzman5, Tiffany G Woynaroski2,3,4,6.   

Abstract

Purpose Hyperacusis is a complex and poorly understood auditory disorder characterized by decreased tolerance to sound at levels that would not trouble most individuals. Recently, it has been suggested that individuals who experience otalgia in response to everyday sounds (termed pain hyperacusis) may differ clinically from those whose primary symptom is the perception of everyday sounds as excessively loud (termed loudness hyperacusis). Despite this theoretical distinction, there have been no empirical studies directly comparing these two populations of hyperacusis patients. Method Using data from a multinational patient registry (the Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford Registry), we examined self-reported demographics, symptoms, comorbidity, and response to treatment in a sample of 243 adults with hyperacusis, 152 of whom were classified as having pain hyperacusis based on reported symptoms. Bayesian statistical tests were used to investigate both the presence and absence of group differences between patients with loudness and pain hyperacusis. Results Individuals with pain hyperacusis presented with a more severe clinical phenotype, reporting a higher frequency of temporary symptom exacerbations (i.e., "setbacks"), less perceived symptom improvement over time, more severe comorbid headache disorders, and reduced benefit from sound therapy. However, the two hypothesized hyperacusis subtypes exhibited more similarities than differences, with the majority of symptoms and comorbidities being equally prevalent across groups. Multiple comorbidities were commonly observed, including tinnitus, primary headache disorders, psychiatric disorders, and functional somatic syndromes. Intolerance of sensory stimuli in other modalities was also frequently reported. Conclusion Although this study provides little evidence that loudness and pain hyperacusis are pathophysiologically distinct conditions, our findings indicate that a pain-predominant phenotype may be a meaningful prognostic marker in patients with hyperacusis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33877881      PMCID: PMC8642094          DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  55 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of psychological interventions for chronic pain on health care use and work absence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Pike; Leslie Hearn; Amanda C de C Williams
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Benson M Hoffman; Rebecca K Papas; David K Chatkoff; Robert D Kerns
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Hypersensitivity to sound--questionnaire data, audiometry and classification.

Authors:  M Anari; A Axelsson; A Eliasson; L Magnusson
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1999

4.  Evidence for Central Sensitization in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Roy La Touche; Alba Paris-Alemany; Amanda Hidalgo-Pérez; Ibai López-de-Uralde-Villanueva; Santiago Angulo-Diaz-Parreño; Daniel Muñoz-García
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  The auditory sensitivity is increased in tinnitus ears.

Authors:  Sylvie Hébert; Philippe Fournier; Arnaud Noreña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  A review of decreased sound tolerance in autism: Definitions, phenomenology, and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Zachary J Williams; Jason L He; Carissa J Cascio; Tiffany G Woynaroski
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Audiometric characteristics of hyperacusis patients.

Authors:  Jacqueline Sheldrake; Peter U Diehl; Roland Schaette
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

Authors:  Theresa Weldring; Sheree M S Smith
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2013-08-04

9.  Efficacy of Multi-Modal Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy on Hyperacusis Patients.

Authors:  Mehdi Abouzari; Donald Tan; Brooke Sarna; Yaser Ghavami; Khodayar Goshtasbi; Erica M Parker; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Misophonia: diagnostic criteria for a new psychiatric disorder.

Authors:  Arjan Schröder; Nienke Vulink; Damiaan Denys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Psychometric validation of a brief self-report measure of misophonia symptoms and functional impairment: The duke-vanderbilt misophonia screening questionnaire.

Authors:  Zachary J Williams; Carissa J Cascio; Tiffany G Woynaroski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.