Vidya Ramaswamy1, Mark Fitzgerald2, Theodora Danciu3, Romesh Nalliah4, Tracy de Peralta5, Stephanie M Munz6, Carol Anne Murdoch-Kinch7. 1. Associate Director for Curriculum & Program Evaluation, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 2. Associate Dean CBCE, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 3. Director of Engaged Learning and Assessment, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 4. Associate Dean for Patient Services, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 5. Senior Associate Dean of Academic Affairs and Innovation, School of Dental Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 6. Program Director, General Practice Residency, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 7. Dean, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to define and develop a set of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for dental education using a modified Delphi consensus approach. EPAs define the core tasks that a graduating dentist needs to perform independently in practice. The EPA framework facilitates assessment of competencies as they manifest in the tasks and independence needed to be ready for practice. METHODS: Feedback was obtained from participants about a list of EPAs, with modifications made after each of the 3 rounds, using a modified Delphi approach. Phase 1 included attendees at the ADEA Fall 2017 meeting (n = 35) who participated in an EPA workshop primarily composed of academic deans. The Phase 2 "reactor panel" consisted of 10 dental schools' academic deans and other individuals with expertise and interest in dental curriculum and assessment (n = 31). Phase 3 participants were attendees at the ADEA CCI 2019 meeting (n = 91) who also participated in a 2-day EPA workshop. RESULTS: In phase 1, overall ratings for acceptability of the EPAs were satisfactory. In phase 2, the next iteration of EPAs was judged as satisfactory for inclusion in curriculum, match well with clinical practice and clarity. In phase 3, the EPAs were judged as satisfactory for being an "entrustable, essential, and important task of the profession." Qualitative feedback suggested wording, measurability, and specific focus of EPA statements is important. CONCLUSIONS: A preliminary set of EPAs was designed for predoctoral dental education through a systematic, careful consensus building approach involving a diverse set of participants.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to define and develop a set of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for dental education using a modified Delphi consensus approach. EPAs define the core tasks that a graduating dentist needs to perform independently in practice. The EPA framework facilitates assessment of competencies as they manifest in the tasks and independence needed to be ready for practice. METHODS: Feedback was obtained from participants about a list of EPAs, with modifications made after each of the 3 rounds, using a modified Delphi approach. Phase 1 included attendees at the ADEA Fall 2017 meeting (n = 35) who participated in an EPA workshop primarily composed of academic deans. The Phase 2 "reactor panel" consisted of 10 dental schools' academic deans and other individuals with expertise and interest in dental curriculum and assessment (n = 31). Phase 3 participants were attendees at the ADEA CCI 2019 meeting (n = 91) who also participated in a 2-day EPA workshop. RESULTS: In phase 1, overall ratings for acceptability of the EPAs were satisfactory. In phase 2, the next iteration of EPAs was judged as satisfactory for inclusion in curriculum, match well with clinical practice and clarity. In phase 3, the EPAs were judged as satisfactory for being an "entrustable, essential, and important task of the profession." Qualitative feedback suggested wording, measurability, and specific focus of EPA statements is important. CONCLUSIONS: A preliminary set of EPAs was designed for predoctoral dental education through a systematic, careful consensus building approach involving a diverse set of participants.