Literature DB >> 33876421

CD21low B cells are predictive markers of new digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis.

Marcella Visentini1, Chiara Pellicano1, Giorgia Leodori1, Ramona Marrapodi1, Stefania Colantuono1, Antonietta Gigante1, Milvia Casato1, Edoardo Rosato1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive role of CD21low B cells as markers of new digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis patients. Peripheral blood B cell subpopulations and clinical assessments have been evaluated in 74 systemic sclerosis patients at baseline and after a 12-month follow-up. After a 12-month follow-up, 23 (31.1%) systemic sclerosis patients developed new digital ulcers. The median percentage of CD21low B cells was significantly higher in patients with than without new digital ulcers [10.1 (4.3-13.6) versus 4.8 (3.5-7.4); p < 0.01]. The 10% cut-off shows good diagnostic accuracy [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.732, confidence interval (CI) = 0.587-0.878; P = 0.01]. Kaplan-Meier curves show a significantly reduced free survival from new digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis patients with CD21low B cells ≥ 10% (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, CD21low B cells ≥ 10%, modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) are associated with the development of new digital ulcers. We hypothesize that CD21low B cells are a predictive marker of new digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis patients.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society for Immunology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B cells; CD21low; connective tissue diseases; digital ulcers; major vascular complications; raynaud's phenomenon; systemic sclerosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33876421      PMCID: PMC8274201          DOI: 10.1111/cei.13604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol        ISSN: 0009-9104            Impact factor:   4.330


INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease characterized by dysregulation of the immune system, endothelial dysfunction, vascular damage and fibrosis of skin and internal organs (1, 2). Several studies have shown that in SSc patients there is an impairment of the homeostasis of B cells, and the efficacy of B cell depletion with rituximab further supports the involvement of B cells in disease development or progression (3, 4, 5, 6, 7). Recently, an increased percentage of B cells with reduced expression of CD21 (CD21low B cells) has been identified in SSc patients. Forestier et al. did not find a significant difference in percentage of CD21low B cells between patients with diffuse (dcSSc) or limited (lcSSc) cutaneous SSc. In a cohort of 74 SSc patients, CD21low B cells were significantly increased in SSc patients compared to healthy controls. The percentage of CD21low B cells is increased in SSc patients with impaired angiogenesis, increased systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP), reduction of diffusion lung of carbon monoxide (DLco) and major vascular manifestations (4). Digital ulcers (DUs) are the main vascular complication of SSc and are reported in approximately 35–40% of SSc patients (8, 9). Several risk factors for the onset of new DUs have been identified, such as high modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), presence of anti‐topoisomerase I antibody, dcSSc subset, higher value of sPAP, increased intrarenal arterial stiffness and late capillaroscopic pattern (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Sebastiani et al. identified a new capillaroscopic predictive index of new DU onset. The capillaroscopic skin ulcer risk index (CSURI) is a new prognostic tool for DUs development in SSc patients (14). The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive role of CD21low B cells in the development of new DUs after 12 months of follow‐up in SSc patients.

METHODS

Subjects

Seventy‐four SSc patients [F = 64, median age = 54 years, interquartile range (IQR) = 46–63], fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative criteria for SSc, were enrolled into this study. Thirty‐four (45.9%) patients had dcSSc, according to Le Roy et al. Demographic and clinical features of SSc patients are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1

Demographic and clinical features of SSc patients

Female, n (%)64 (86.5)
dcSSc, n (%)34 (45.9)
SSc‐specific autoantibodies
Anti‐topoisomerase I, n (%)29 (39.2)
Anti‐centromere, n (%)21 (28.4)
Anti‐RNA polymerase III, n (%)1 (1.4)
None, n (%)23 (31.1)
Nailfold capillaroscopic pattern
Early, n (%)16 (21.6)
Active, n (%)17 (23)
Late, n (%)41 (55.4)
New digital ulcers, n (%)23 (31.1)
CD21low B cells ≥ 10% at baseline, n (%)20 (27)
CD21low B cells ≥ 10% at follow‐up, n (%)21 (28)

Abbreviations: dcSSc, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; SSc, systemic sclerosis.

Demographic and clinical features of SSc patients Abbreviations: dcSSc, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; SSc, systemic sclerosis. Exclusion criteria were: hematological malignancies, pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases not related to SSc, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, thrombophilia, secondary anti‐phospholipid syndrome, smoke, pregnancy, breastfeeding and treatment in the last 6 months with immunosuppressive agents and corticosteroids at an equivalent dose of prednisone ≥ 10 mg/day. The subjects’ written consent was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the study was approved by the ethics committee of Sapienza University (no. 5435).

Evaluation of B cell subpopulation

Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood samples at baseline and after 12‐month follow‐up was performed with combinations of fluorochrome‐labeled monoclonal antibodies (Becton‐Dickinson Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) to CD19‐PC5.5, CD21‐phycoerythrin (PE), CD27‐allophycocyanin (APC) and immunoglobulin (Ig)D‐fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). Flow cytometry analysis was performed on a BD fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS)Calibur system and data files were acquired and analysed using CELLQuest version 3.3 (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA, USA) and FlowJo (TreeStar, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) software. We chose a threshold of 10% for CD21low B cells. This value has been chosen as media ± 2 standard deviations (s.d.) of the CD21low B cells percentage of healthy controls, according to our previous study (4).

Clinical assessments

The main clinical indices were assessed for all SSc patients at baseline and every 6 months for a follow‐up period of 12 months. Skin involvement was assessed by mRSS (18). The activity and severity of disease were assessed by disease activity index (DAI) (19) and disease severity scale (DSS) (20), respectively. The scleroderma pattern (early, active, late) was evaluated with nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) equipped with a ×500 optical probe (21). DUs were defined according to Amanzi et al. (22). The timing of first new DUs was reported and the patient was censored.

Statistical analysis

All results are expressed as mean ± s.d. and median and IQR, as appropriate. SPSS version 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The coefficient of skewness and the Shapiro–Wilk test were used to evaluate normal distribution of data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to analyse the prognostic accuracy of CD21low B cells for the development of new DUs at follow‐up. All time‐to‐event end‐points were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and analysed with the log‐rank test. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by use of Cox regression models. Multivariate analysis was applied for the estimation of CD21low B cells with clinical features. Group comparisons were made by Mann–Whitney U‐test. The Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used for comparison of the average of two dependent samples. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to test for associations between numerical variables. The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, were used to compare categorical variables. p values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

CD21low B cells in SSc patients are stable during the long‐term follow‐up

The mean percentage of B cells of total lymphocytes was unchanged from baseline (8.8 ± 4.5% versus 9.4 ± 5.7%), as were percentages of naive (65.4 ± 20.9% versus 61.4 ± 22.7%), IgM+ memory (12.2 ± 10% versus 12.1 ± 9.9%), switched memory (16.5 ± 12.2 versus 18.6 ± 13.3%) and double‐negative (DN) B cells (6.5 ± 4.4% versus 6.5 ± 5%) (Figure 1a). CD21low B cells were slightly increased over time (6.7 ± 4.3% versus 8.6% ± 5; p < 0.05) (Figure 1b), but when the two subgroups of SSc patients, SSc‐CD21+ and SSc‐CD21low, were analyzed separately, we found no differences in the percentages of CD21low B cells after follow‐up (Figure 1b). Only one patient (male, 47 years) changed from CD21+ to CD21low SSc subgroup because of an increase of CD21low B cells above 10% of total B cells (5.3% at baseline and 15% at follow‐up), confirming that CD21+ and CD21low SSc patients are distinct subsets of patients.
FIGURE 1

B cell subpopulation distribution in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients at baseline and follow‐up. Percentages of naive, immunoglobulin (Ig)M+ memory, switched memory and double‐negative (DN) B cells in SSc patients at baseline and at the end of follow‐up (a); percentages of CD21low B cells in SSc patients and in CD21low and CD21+ SSc patients at baseline and at the end of follow‐up (b); gating strategy of CD21low B cells in one representative SSc CD21low patient (c)

B cell subpopulation distribution in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients at baseline and follow‐up. Percentages of naive, immunoglobulin (Ig)M+ memory, switched memory and double‐negative (DN) B cells in SSc patients at baseline and at the end of follow‐up (a); percentages of CD21low B cells in SSc patients and in CD21low and CD21+ SSc patients at baseline and at the end of follow‐up (b); gating strategy of CD21low B cells in one representative SSc CD21low patient (c)

CD21low B cells and DUs

At baseline, 20 (27%) SSc patients had CD21low B cells ≥ 10% of total B cells and 44 (59.5%) had history of DUs. We did not observe a linear correlation between CD21low B cells and mRSS or changes of capillaroscopic pattern in all patients at follow‐up. Table 1 shows clinical findings of SSc patients. After a 12‐month follow‐up period, 23 (31.1%) SSc patients developed new DUs. Sixteen of these 23 (21.6%) SSc patients had a percentage of CD21low B cells ≥ 10% of total B cells (Table 1). Table 2 shows the median value of CD21low B cells and clinical variables at baseline and after 12‐month follow‐up. The median values of CD21low B cells at follow‐up were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than at baseline [7 (4–13) versus 5.3% (3.7–9.1); p < 0.05]. Median values of CD21low B cells at baseline [10.1 (4.3–13.6) versus 4.8% (3.5–7.4); p < 0.01] were significantly higher in patients with new DUs than patients without new DUs.
TABLE 2

Median values and IQR of CD21low B‐cells, sPAP, FVC and DLco in SSc patients at baseline and after 12‐month follow‐up

BaselineFollow‐up p
CD21low B cells, %, median and IQR5.3 (3.7–9.1)7 (4–13) <0.05
sPAP, mmHg, median and IQR28.5 (26–33)28 (25–31)>0.05
FVC, % predicted, median and IQR96 (85–110)100.5 (91–115) <0.05
DLco, % predicted, median and IQR71 (64–80)73.5 (63–82)>0.05
mRSS, median and IQR9.5 (6–16)9 (6–16)>0.05
DAI, median and IQR1.5 (0.6–2.4)1.5 (1– 3)>0.05
DSS, median and IQR5 (4–6)5 (4–6)>0.05

Abbreviations: DAI, disease activity index; DLco, diffusing capacity of the lung for monoxide carbon; DSS, disease severity scale; FVC, forced vital capacity; IQR, interquartile range; mRSS, modified Rodnan skin score; PAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure.

Significant p‐values are reported in bold type.

Median values and IQR of CD21low B‐cells, sPAP, FVC and DLco in SSc patients at baseline and after 12‐month follow‐up Abbreviations: DAI, disease activity index; DLco, diffusing capacity of the lung for monoxide carbon; DSS, disease severity scale; FVC, forced vital capacity; IQR, interquartile range; mRSS, modified Rodnan skin score; PAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Significant p‐values are reported in bold type. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that CD21low B cells predict new DUs [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.732 (95% CI = 0.587–0.878); p < 0.05](Figure 2).
FIGURE 2

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis performed to analyze the prognostic accuracy of CD21low B cells

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis performed to analyze the prognostic accuracy of CD21low B cells Kaplan–Meier analysis comparing new DUs free survival in SSc patients with CD21low B cells ≥ 10% or CD21low B cells < 10% demonstrated that those with CD21low B cells ≥ 10% develop new DUs (log‐rank test < 0.0001) (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3

Kaplan–Meier curves for the onset of new digital ulcers during a 12‐month follow‐up period in systemic sclerosis patients with normal or increased CD21low B cells

Kaplan–Meier curves for the onset of new digital ulcers during a 12‐month follow‐up period in systemic sclerosis patients with normal or increased CD21low B cells Using univariate regression analysis, CD21low B cells ≥ 10% [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.413 (95% CI = 0.272–0.625); p < 0.0001], dcSSc [HR = 1.627 (95% CI = 1.058–2.5); p < 0.05], late capillaroscopic pattern [HR = 0.373 (95% CI = 0.203–0.685); p < 0.01], mRSS [HR = 1.053 (95% CI = 1.012–1.095); p < 0.05], sPAP [HR = 1.155 (95% CI = 1.074–1.242); p < 0.0001] and DLco [HR = 0.965 (95% CI = 0.943–0.988); p < 0.01] predicted new DUs (Table 3). Variables included in the multivariate model were those statistically significant by univariate analysis. The final multivariate model included CD21low B cells ≥ 10% [HR = 0.392 (95% CI = 0.245–0.627); p < 0.0001], SSc subset [HR = 0.726 (95% CI = 0.388–1.356); p > 0.05], late capillaroscopic pattern [HR = 0.612 (95% CI = 0.294–1.277); p > 0.05], mRSS [HR = 1.074 (95% CI = 1.004–1.149); p < 0.05], sPAP [HR = 1.116 (95% CI = 1.026–1.514); p < 0.05] and DLco [HR = 0.987 (95% CI = 0.958–1.017); p > 0.05] (Table 3).
TABLE 3

Univariate and multivariate analysis with hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval (CI) for the development of new digital ulcers in SSc patients with CD21low B cells ≥ 10%

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
HR (CI) p HR (CI) p
SSc subset (dcSSc)1.627 (1.058–2.500) <0.05 0.726 (0.388–1.356)>0.05
Nailfold capillaroscopic pattern (late)0.373 (0.203–0.685) <0.01 0.612 (0.294–1.277)>0.05
SSc‐specific autoantibodies (Scl70)0.656 (0.336–1.282)>0.05
CD21low B cells0.413 (0.272 0.625) <0.0001 0.392 (0.245–0.627) <0.0001
mRSS1.053 (1.012–1.095) <0.05 1.074 (1.004–1.149) <0.05
sPAP1.155 (1.074–1.242) <0.0001 1.116 (1.026–1.514) <0.05
DLco0.965 (0.943–0.988) <0.01 0.987 (0.958–1.017)>0.05

Abbreviations: dcSSc, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; DLco, diffusing capacity of the lung for monoxide carbon; mRSS, modified Rodnan skin score; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; SSc, systemic sclerosis.

Significant p‐values are reported in bold type.

Univariate and multivariate analysis with hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval (CI) for the development of new digital ulcers in SSc patients with CD21low B cells ≥ 10% Abbreviations: dcSSc, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; DLco, diffusing capacity of the lung for monoxide carbon; mRSS, modified Rodnan skin score; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; SSc, systemic sclerosis. Significant p‐values are reported in bold type.

DISCUSSION

In our cohort of SSc patients we found an increased percentage of CD21low B cells compared to the data reported in the literature concerning the general population. In SSc patients, the percentage of CD21low B cells ≥ 10% represents a predictive marker of new DUs during a 12‐month follow‐up. Forestier et al. showed an increased percentage of CD21low B cells in SSc patients compared to health controls, but they did not find an association of this subset of B cells with any disease feature (3). Marrapodi et al. demonstrated that CD21low B cells are increased and are less prone to apoptosis in SSc patients. Moreover, the authors observed a positive correlation between percentage of CD21low B cells and sPAP or renal resistive index; conversely, a negative correlation was found between the percentage of CD21low B cells and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or DLco. The authors hypothesized that CD21low B cells play a role in the vascular manifestations of SSc (4). In this study we demonstrate for the first time, to our knowledge, that the percentage of CD21low B cells ≥ 10% is a predictive marker of new DUs. In SSc patients with new DUs the percentage of CD21low B cells is increased. In univariate analysis we demonstrated that well‐known risk factors of DUs (mRSS, late capillaroscopic pattern, dcSSc, Scl‐70, sPAP) were predictive variables of onset of new DUs. In multivariate analysis, only CD21low B cells, mRSS and sPAP represent predictive markers of new DUs. In several studies, late capillaroscopic pattern, dcSSc subset, anti‐topoisomerase I antibody and high mRSS have been shown to be strong predictors for DUs (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Smith et al. found an association between worsening of capillaroscopic pattern and severe peripheral vascular involvement at 18 and 24 months. The late capillaroscopic pattern is associated with future severe peripheral vascular disease (13). Sebastiani et al. demonstrated that the capillaroscopic skin ulcers risk index (CSURI) is a predictive marker of onset of new DUs, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 92.98 and 81.4%, respectively, at the cut‐off value of 2.96 (14). In a recent study, Marrapodi et al. hypothesized a possible interference of CD21low B cells with proangiogenetic mechanisms (4). In addition, SSc patients with higher mRSS experienced earlier DU occurrences (10). Walker et al., in a report from the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Scleroderma Trials and Research group database, showed a predictive marker of new DU‐positive anti‐topoisomerase I antibodies (15). In a post‐hoc analysis of a registry evaluating the prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in SSc patients, DUs were associated with dcSSc and positive anti‐topoisomerase I antibodies. Tiev et al. did not find any association of DUs with increased sPAP (11). In a recent study of 189 consecutive SSc patients with an incident DUs diagnosis identified from the EUSTAR database, increased sPAP at diagnosis was associated with the presence of any DUs at the prospective visit (16). Rosato et al. demonstrated that renal resistive index is a predictive marker of onset of new DUs (17). The authors conclude that increased intrarenal stiffness is a major vascular complication, such as DUs, PAH and scleroderma renal crisis. CD21low B cells are associated with visceral vascular complications and impaired angiogenesis in SSc patients. In this study, the authors hypothesized a role of CD21low B cells in major vascular complications such as DUs (4). This study has some limitations, such as the absence of evaluation of regulatory T cell (Treg) reductions, functional defects or increased numbers of plasmablasts. We hypothesize that CD21low B cells may be a possible predictive marker of new DUs. The association of this parameter with other well‐known markers could indicate patients to be evaluated more frequently because they are more prone to develop new DUs. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

ETHICS APPROVAL STATEMENT

The study was approved by the ethics committee of Sapienza University (no. 5435), Rome (Italy).

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work and acquisition of the data. All authors contributed to the critical review and revision of the manuscript and approved the final version. M. V., C. P., G. L., R. M., S. C., A. G., M. C. and E. R. acquired and analyzed the data, analyzed the results and prepared the manuscript; M. V., C. P., G. L., R. M. and S. C. performed the final data analyses; M. V., C. P., GL., R. M., S. C., A. G., M. C. and E. R. wrote the manuscript; E. R. supervised the study.
  22 in total

1.  Do worsening scleroderma capillaroscopic patterns predict future severe organ involvement? a pilot study.

Authors:  Vanessa Smith; Saskia Decuman; Alberto Sulli; Carolien Bonroy; Yves Piettte; Ellen Deschepper; Filip de Keyser; Maurizio Cutolo
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Outcomes of patients with systemic sclerosis treated with rituximab in contemporary practice: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Muriel Elhai; Marouane Boubaya; Oliver Distler; Vanessa Smith; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Juan José Alegre Sancho; Marie-Elise Truchetet; Yolanda Braun-Moscovici; Florenzo Iannone; Pavel I Novikov; Alain Lescoat; Elise Siegert; Ivan Castellví; Paolo Airó; Serena Vettori; Ellen De Langhe; Eric Hachulla; Anne Erler; Lidia Ananieva; Martin Krusche; F J López-Longo; Jörg H W Distler; Nicolas Hunzelmann; Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold; Valeria Riccieri; Vivien M Hsu; Maria R Pozzi; Codrina Ancuta; Edoardo Rosato; Carina Mihai; Masataka Kuwana; Lesley Ann Saketkoo; Carlo Chizzolini; Roger Hesselstrand; Susanne Ullman; Sule Yavuz; Simona Rednic; Cristian Caimmi; Coralie Bloch-Queyrat; Yannick Allanore
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Digital ulcers in scleroderma: staging, characteristics and sub-setting through observation of 1614 digital lesions.

Authors:  Laura Amanzi; Francesca Braschi; Ginevra Fiori; Felice Galluccio; Irene Miniati; Serena Guiducci; Maria-Letizia Conforti; Olga Kaloudi; Francesca Nacci; Oana Sacu; Antonio Candelieri; Alberto Pignone; Laura Rasero; Domenico Conforti; Marco Matucci-Cerinic
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Clinical risk assessment of organ manifestations in systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials And Research group database.

Authors:  U A Walker; A Tyndall; L Czirják; C Denton; D Farge-Bancel; O Kowal-Bielecka; U Müller-Ladner; C Bocelli-Tyndall; M Matucci-Cerinic
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Daniel E Furst; Philip J Clements; Yannick Allanore; Murray Baron; Lazlo Czirjak; Oliver Distler; Ivan Foeldvari; Masataka Kuwana; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Maureen Mayes; Thomas Medsger; Peter A Merkel; Janet E Pope; James R Seibold; Virginia Steen; Wendy Stevens; Christopher P Denton
Journal:  J Scleroderma Relat Disord       Date:  2017 Jan-Apr

6.  The European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) task force for the development of revised activity criteria for systemic sclerosis: derivation and validation of a preliminarily revised EUSTAR activity index.

Authors:  Gabriele Valentini; Michele Iudici; Ulrich A Walker; Veronika K Jaeger; Murray Baron; Patricia Carreira; László Czirják; Christopher P Denton; Oliver Distler; Eric Hachulla; Ariane L Herrick; Otylia Kowal-Bielecka; Janet Pope; Ulf Müller-Ladner; Gabriela Riemekasten; Jerome Avouac; Marc Frerix; Suzana Jordan; Tünde Minier; Elise Siegert; Voon H Ong; Serena Vettori; Yannick Allanore
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Clinical features of scleroderma patients with or without prior or current ischemic digital ulcers: post-hoc analysis of a nationwide multicenter cohort (ItinérAIR-Sclérodermie).

Authors:  Kiet Phong Tiev; Elisabeth Diot; Pierre Clerson; Frédérique Dupuis-Siméon; Eric Hachulla; Pierre-Yves Hatron; Joël Constans; Daniéla Cirstéa; Dominique Farge-Bancel; Patrick H Carpentier
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  CD21low B cells in systemic sclerosis: A possible marker of vascular complications.

Authors:  Ramona Marrapodi; Chiara Pellicano; Giovanna Radicchio; Giorgia Leodori; Stefania Colantuono; Andrea Iacolare; Antonietta Gigante; Marcella Visentini; Edoardo Rosato
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Altered B lymphocyte homeostasis and functions in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Alexandra Forestier; Thomas Guerrier; Mathieu Jouvray; Jonathan Giovannelli; Guillaume Lefèvre; Vincent Sobanski; Carine Hauspie; Eric Hachulla; Pierre-Yves Hatron; Hélène Zéphir; Patrick Vermersch; Myriam Labalette; David Launay; Sylvain Dubucquoi
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 9.754

10.  Systemic Sclerosis Patients Present Alterations in the Expression of Molecules Involved in B-Cell Regulation.

Authors:  Lilian Soto; Ashley Ferrier; Octavio Aravena; Elianet Fonseca; Jorge Berendsen; Andrea Biere; Daniel Bueno; Verónica Ramos; Juan Carlos Aguillón; Diego Catalán
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenetic Aspects of Systemic Sclerosis: A View Through the Prism of B Cells.

Authors:  Konstantinos Melissaropoulos; George Iliopoulos; Lazaros I Sakkas; Dimitrios Daoussis
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 2.  Contributions of Immune Cells and Stromal Cells to the Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis: Recent Insights.

Authors:  Bingying Dai; Liqing Ding; Lijuan Zhao; Honglin Zhu; Hui Luo
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Serum resistin is predictive marker of development of new digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Chiara Pellicano; Giorgia Leodori; Amalia Colalillo; Luca Navarini; Antonietta Gigante; Edoardo Rosato
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.057

4.  Increased Frequency of Activated Switched Memory B Cells and Its Association With the Presence of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Patients.

Authors:  Diána Simon; Péter Balogh; Szabina Erdő-Bonyár; Katalin Böröcz; Tünde Minier; László Czirják; Tímea Berki
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  CD19 + CD21lo/neg cells are increased in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Erin M Wilfong; Katherine N Vowell; Kaitlyn E Bunn; Elise Rizzi; Narender Annapureddy; Rosemarie B Dudenhofer; April Barnado; Rachel H Bonami; Joyce E Johnson; Leslie J Crofford; Peggy L Kendall
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 5.057

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.