Jennifer Q Zhang1, Joe Dong2, Jaime Pardo1, Isha Emhoff1, Stephanie Serres1, Tait Shanafelt3, Ted James4,5. 1. Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. 2. OpenNotes, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Ted.James@bidmc.harvard.edu. 5. BreastCare Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Ted.James@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior work has shown that burnout among breast surgeons is prevalent and highest in those earlier in their clinical practice career. Therefore, we sought to better understand and identify specific contributors to early-career breast surgeon burnout. METHODS: We analyzed data from our 2017 survey of members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons. The 16-items of the Professional Fulfillment Index were used in determining overall burnout and professional fulfillment scores. Multivariable regressions were performed to evaluate factors related to overall burnout and professional fulfillment. RESULTS: The mean overall burnout score was 1.23 (0-4 scale; higher score unfavorable) for surgeons in practice < 5 years, compared with 1.39 for surgeons in practice 5-9 years and 1.22 for those in practice ≥ 10 years. The mean professional fulfillment score was 2.71 (0-4 scale; higher score favorable) for surgeons in practice < 5 years, 2.66 for surgeons in practice 5-9 years, and 2.67 for surgeons in practice ≥ 10 years. Multivariable analysis showed that burnout was positively correlated with ≥ 60 work hours per week in the group practicing for < 5 years, and dedicating less than full time to breast surgery in the group in practice 5-9 years. Professional fulfillment was negatively associated with single relationship status in surgeons practicing < 5 years, and dedicating less than full time to breast surgery for those in practice 5-9 years. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that breast surgeons who have been in practice for 5-9 years have particularly high overall burnout rates and additional support focused on this group of breast surgeons may be needed.
BACKGROUND: Prior work has shown that burnout among breast surgeons is prevalent and highest in those earlier in their clinical practice career. Therefore, we sought to better understand and identify specific contributors to early-career breast surgeon burnout. METHODS: We analyzed data from our 2017 survey of members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons. The 16-items of the Professional Fulfillment Index were used in determining overall burnout and professional fulfillment scores. Multivariable regressions were performed to evaluate factors related to overall burnout and professional fulfillment. RESULTS: The mean overall burnout score was 1.23 (0-4 scale; higher score unfavorable) for surgeons in practice < 5 years, compared with 1.39 for surgeons in practice 5-9 years and 1.22 for those in practice ≥ 10 years. The mean professional fulfillment score was 2.71 (0-4 scale; higher score favorable) for surgeons in practice < 5 years, 2.66 for surgeons in practice 5-9 years, and 2.67 for surgeons in practice ≥ 10 years. Multivariable analysis showed that burnout was positively correlated with ≥ 60 work hours per week in the group practicing for < 5 years, and dedicating less than full time to breast surgery in the group in practice 5-9 years. Professional fulfillment was negatively associated with single relationship status in surgeons practicing < 5 years, and dedicating less than full time to breast surgery for those in practice 5-9 years. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that breast surgeons who have been in practice for 5-9 years have particularly high overall burnout rates and additional support focused on this group of breast surgeons may be needed.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Lotte Dyrbye; Gerald Bechamps; Tom Russell; Daniel Satele; Teresa Rummans; Karen Swartz; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2011-01
Authors: Shasha Han; Tait D Shanafelt; Christine A Sinsky; Karim M Awad; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Lynne C Fiscus; Mickey Trockel; Joel Goh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Michelle Mungo; Jaime Schmitgen; Kristin A Storz; David Reeves; Sharonne N Hayes; Jeff A Sloan; Stephen J Swensen; Steven J Buskirk Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Amy K Windover; Kathryn Martinez; Mary Beth Mercer; Katie Neuendorf; Adrienne Boissy; Michael B Rothberg Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Annette Scheid; Jochen Profit; Tait Shanafelt; Mickey Trockel; Kathryn C Adair; J Bryan Sexton; John P A Ioannidis Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael R Oreskovich; Krista L Kaups; Charles M Balch; John B Hanks; Daniel Satele; Jeff Sloan; Charles Meredith; Amanda Buhl; Lotte N Dyrbye; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2012-02
Authors: Maryam S Hamidi; Bryan Bohman; Christy Sandborg; Rebecca Smith-Coggins; Patty de Vries; Marisa S Albert; Mary Lou Murphy; Dana Welle; Mickey T Trockel Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Diana Lin; Daniel R Gomez; Yue Helen Zhang; Renee Gennarelli; Jason A Efstathiou; Chris A Barker; Daphna Y Gelblum; Monika K Shah; Laura Liberman; Ariel E Hirsch; Oren Cahlon; Erin F Gillespie Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 8.013