Literature DB >> 33875437

Role of the SOS Response in the Generation of Antibiotic Resistance In Vivo.

John K Crane1, Cassandra L Alvarado1, Mark D Sutton2.   

Abstract

The SOS response to DNA damage is a conserved stress response in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Although this pathway has been studied for years, its relevance is still not familiar to many working in the fields of clinical antibiotic resistance and stewardship. Under some conditions, the SOS response favors DNA repair and preserves the genetic integrity of the organism. On the other hand, the SOS response also includes induction of error-prone DNA polymerases, which can increase the rate of mutation, called the mutator phenotype or "hypermutation." As a result, mutations can occur in genes conferring antibiotic resistance, increasing the acquisition of resistance to antibiotics. Almost all of the work on the SOS response has been on bacteria exposed to stressors in vitro. In this study, we sought to quantitate the effects of SOS-inducing drugs in vivo, in comparison with the same drugs in vitro. We used a rabbit model of intestinal infection with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strain E22. SOS-inducing drugs triggered the mutator phenotype response in vivo as well as in vitro. Exposure of E. coli strain E22 to ciprofloxacin or zidovudine, both of which induce the SOS response in vitro, resulted in increased antibiotic resistance to 3 antibiotics: rifampin, minocycline, and fosfomycin. Zinc was able to inhibit the SOS-induced emergence of antibiotic resistance in vivo, as previously observed in vitro. Our findings may have relevance in reducing the emergence of resistance to new antimicrobial drugs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RecA; enteropathogenic E. coli; fosfomycin; heteroresistance; hypermutation; minocycline; rabbit model; rifampin; zidovudine; zinc

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33875437      PMCID: PMC8373240          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00013-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  61 in total

1.  Contribution of the TetB Efflux Pump to Minocycline Susceptibility among Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Strains.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Christi L McElheny; Roberta T Mettus; Robert M Q Shanks; Yohei Doi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Involvement of the lon protease in the SOS response triggered by ciprofloxacin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1.

Authors:  Elena B M Breidenstein; Manjeet Bains; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa adaptation and evolution in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Elio Rossi; Ruggero La Rosa; Jennifer A Bartell; Rasmus L Marvig; Janus A J Haagensen; Lea M Sommer; Søren Molin; Helle Krogh Johansen
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Type IV pili, transient bacterial aggregates, and virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D Bieber; S W Ramer; C Y Wu; W J Murray; T Tobe; R Fernandez; G K Schoolnik
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-06-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Zinc and Copper Reduce Conjugative Transfer of Resistance Plasmids from Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  May Linn Buberg; Ingun Lund Witsø; Trine Marie L'Abée-Lund; Yngvild Wasteson
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.431

6.  Evidence for induction of integron-based antibiotic resistance by the SOS response in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Didier Hocquet; Catherine Llanes; Michelle Thouverez; Hemantha D Kulasekara; Xavier Bertrand; Patrick Plésiat; Didier Mazel; Samuel I Miller
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 6.823

7.  After 30 years of study, the bacterial SOS response still surprises us.

Authors:  Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Zinc protects against Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli by acting on host tissues as well as on bacteria.

Authors:  John K Crane; Jackie E Broome; Ryan M Reddinger; Benjamin B Werth
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Bacterial RecA Protein Promotes Adenoviral Recombination during In Vitro Infection.

Authors:  Jeong Yoon Lee; Ji Sun Lee; Emma C Materne; Rahul Rajala; Ashrafali M Ismail; Donald Seto; David W Dyer; Jaya Rajaiya; James Chodosh
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 10.  The SOS system: A complex and tightly regulated response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Katarzyna H Maslowska; Karolina Makiela-Dzbenska; Iwona J Fijalkowska
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.216

View more
  4 in total

1.  Inhibition of SOS Response by Nitric Oxide Donors in Escherichia coli Blocks Toxin Production and Hypermutation.

Authors:  John K Crane; Sarah R Burke; Cassandra L Alvarado
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.073

2.  Host cell RecA activates a mobile element-encoded mutagenic DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Debika Ojha; Malgorzata M Jaszczur; Adhirath Sikand; John P McDonald; Andrew Robinson; Antoine M van Oijen; Chi H Mak; Fabien Pinaud; Michael M Cox; Roger Woodgate; Myron F Goodman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 19.160

Review 3.  Molecular Factors and Mechanisms Driving Multidrug Resistance in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli-An Update.

Authors:  Marcin Rozwadowski; Damian Gawel
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.141

4.  Psychoactive Drugs Induce the SOS Response and Shiga Toxin Production in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  John K Crane; Mashal Salehi; Cassandra L Alvarado
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.