Kazi T Haq1, Neeraj Javadekar1, Larisa G Tereshchenko2. 1. Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Portland, OR, USA. 2. Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Portland, OR, USA. Electronic address: tereshch@ohsu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pacing artifacts must be excluded from the analysis of paced ECG waveform. This study aimed to develop and validate an algorithm to identify and remove the pacing artifacts on ECG and vectorcardiogram (VCG). METHODS: We developed a semi-automatic algorithm that identifies the onset and offset of a pacing artifact based on the VCG signal slope steepness and designed a graphical user interface that permits quality control and fine-tuning the constraining threshold values. We used 1054 ECGs from the retrospective, multicenter cohort study "Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes," including 3825 atrial and 10,031 ventricular pacing artifacts for the algorithm development and 22 ECGs including 108 atrial and 241 ventricular pacing artifacts for validation. Validation was performed per digital sample. We used the kappa-statistic of interrater agreement between manually labeled sample (ground-truth) and automated detection. RESULTS: The constraining parameter values were for onset threshold 13.06 ± 6.21 μV/ms, offset threshold 34.77 ± 17.80 μV/ms, and maximum window size 27.23 ± 3.53 ms. The automated algorithm detected a digital sample belonging to pacing artifact with a sensitivity of 74.5% and specificity of 99.6% and classified correctly 98.8% of digital samples (ROC AUC 0.871; 95%CI 0.853-0.878). The kappa-statistic was 0.785, indicating substantial agreement. The agreement was on 98.81% digital samples, significantly (P < 0.00001) larger than the random agreement on 94.43% of digital samples. CONCLUSIONS: The semi-automated algorithm can detect and remove ECG pacing artifacts with high accuracy and provide a user-friendly interface for quality control.
BACKGROUND: Pacing artifacts must be excluded from the analysis of paced ECG waveform. This study aimed to develop and validate an algorithm to identify and remove the pacing artifacts on ECG and vectorcardiogram (VCG). METHODS: We developed a semi-automatic algorithm that identifies the onset and offset of a pacing artifact based on the VCG signal slope steepness and designed a graphical user interface that permits quality control and fine-tuning the constraining threshold values. We used 1054 ECGs from the retrospective, multicenter cohort study "Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes," including 3825 atrial and 10,031 ventricular pacing artifacts for the algorithm development and 22 ECGs including 108 atrial and 241 ventricular pacing artifacts for validation. Validation was performed per digital sample. We used the kappa-statistic of interrater agreement between manually labeled sample (ground-truth) and automated detection. RESULTS: The constraining parameter values were for onset threshold 13.06 ± 6.21 μV/ms, offset threshold 34.77 ± 17.80 μV/ms, and maximum window size 27.23 ± 3.53 ms. The automated algorithm detected a digital sample belonging to pacing artifact with a sensitivity of 74.5% and specificity of 99.6% and classified correctly 98.8% of digital samples (ROC AUC 0.871; 95%CI 0.853-0.878). The kappa-statistic was 0.785, indicating substantial agreement. The agreement was on 98.81% digital samples, significantly (P < 0.00001) larger than the random agreement on 94.43% of digital samples. CONCLUSIONS: The semi-automated algorithm can detect and remove ECG pacing artifacts with high accuracy and provide a user-friendly interface for quality control.
Authors: Jonathan W Waks; Colleen M Sitlani; Elsayed Z Soliman; Muammar Kabir; Elyar Ghafoori; Mary L Biggs; Charles A Henrikson; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tor Biering-Sørensen; Sunil K Agarwal; David S Siscovick; Wendy S Post; Scott D Solomon; Alfred E Buxton; Mark E Josephson; Larisa G Tereshchenko Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Salim S Virani; Alvaro Alonso; Emelia J Benjamin; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Francesca N Delling; Luc Djousse; Mitchell S V Elkind; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Tak W Kwan; Daniel T Lackland; Tené T Lewis; Judith H Lichtman; Chris T Longenecker; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Seth S Martin; Kunihiro Matsushita; Andrew E Moran; Michael E Mussolino; Amanda Marma Perak; Wayne D Rosamond; Gregory A Roth; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Christina M Shay; Nicole L Spartano; Andrew Stokes; David L Tirschwell; Lisa B VanWagner; Connie W Tsao Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kazi T Haq; Blake L Cooper; Fiona Berk; Anysja Roberts; Luther M Swift; Nikki Gillum Posnack Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 4.755