Literature DB >> 33872056

Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Contributes Little to Change In Vivo Kinematics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Daisuke Chiba1,2,3, Tom Gale3, Kyohei Nishida1,3,4, Felipe Suntaxi3, Bryson P Lesniak1, Freddie H Fu1, William Anderst3, Volker Musahl1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in combination with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has been proposed to improve residual rotatory knee instability in patients having ACL deficiency. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to compare the effects of isolated ACLR (iACLR) versus LET in combination with ACLR (ACLR+LET) on in vivo kinematics during downhill running. It was hypothesized that ACLR+LET would reduce the internal rotation of the reconstructed knee in comparison with iACLR. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: A total of 18 patients with ACL deficiency were included. All participants were randomly assigned to receive ACLR+ LET or iACLR during surgery. Six months and 12 months after surgery, knee joint motion during downhill running was measured using dynamic biplane radiography and a validated registration process that matched patient-specific 3-dimensional bone models to synchronized biplane radiographs. Anterior tibial translation (ATT; positive value means "anterior translation") and tibial rotation (TR) relative to the femur were calculated for both knees. The side-to-side differences (SSDs) in kinematics were also calculated (operated knee-contralateral healthy knee). The SSD value was compared between ACLR+LET and iACLR groups using a Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: At 6 months after surgery, the SSD of ATT in patients who had undergone ACLR+LET (-1.9 ± 2.0 mm) was significantly greater than that in patients who had undergone iACLR (0.9 ± 2.3 mm) at 0% of the gait cycle (foot strike) (P = .031). There was no difference in ATT 12 months after surgery. Regarding TR, there were no differences between ACLR+LET and iACLR at either 6 months (P value range, .161-.605) or 12 months (P value range, .083-.279) after surgery.
CONCLUSION: LET in combination with ACLR significantly reduced ATT at the instant of foot strike during downhill running at 6 months after surgery. However, this effect was not significant at 12 months after surgery. The addition of LET to ACLR had no effect on TR at both 6 and 12 months after surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LET in combination with ACLR may stabilize sagittal knee motion during downhill running in the early postoperation phase, but according to this study, it has no effect on 12-month in vivo kinematics. REGISTRATION: NCT02913404 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; in vivo kinematics; lateral extra-articular tenodesis; pivot shift; residual rotatory instability

Year:  2021        PMID: 33872056     DOI: 10.1177/03635465211003298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  5 in total

1.  Lateral extraarticular tenodesis improves stability in non-anatomic ACL reconstructed knees: in vivo kinematic analysis.

Authors:  Simone Perelli; Rodolfo Morales-Avalos; Mario Formagnana; Gonzalo Rojas-Castillo; Gil Serrancolí; Juan Carlos Monllau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Ian D Engler; Ehab M Nazzal; Jonathan F Dalton; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Jonathan D Hughes; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Della Villa; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part 1: biology and biomechanics.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Ehab M Nazzal; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Rafael Serrano; Jonathan D Hughes; Fabrizio Margheritini; Stefano Zaffagnini; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Delay Functional Recovery, Rehabilitation, and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis From the SANTI (Scientific ACL Network International) Study Group.

Authors:  Marine Coquard; Alessandro Carrozzo; Adnan Saithna; Gregory Vigne; Meven Le Guen; Yann Fournier; Jean-Philippe Hager; Thais Dutra Vieira; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28

5.  Clinical and mechanical outcomes in isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Nikhil Agarwal; Jaibaji Monketh; Andrea Volpin
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.