Literature DB >> 33871864

Changing Health-Related Behaviors 2: On Improving the Value of Health Spending.

Karen Dickson1, Robert Wilson1, Owen Parfrey1, Patrick S Parfrey2.   

Abstract

The quantity of health spending does not equate directly to the quality of healthcare. Social spending and nonmedical determinants of health impact on health outcomes. The value of health spending in the United States is limited by the high cost of goods and labor, and administrative costs, high use of low-level care, and lack of basic healthcare coverage in a substantial minority of the population. There are additional reasons for differences in the value of health spending as revealed by a comparison of Canada and Australia, where similar spending per capita results in better health system performance in Australia than in Canada. Within Canada, there are large differences between provinces in the value of health spending. Overutilization of health resources occurs when an intervention is not indicated, or of low value, or is provided at the wrong time. The Choosing Wisely Initiative is a solution for overutilization of low-value care. Recognition of the reality that effective treatments are often applied inconsistently and inappropriately has spurred the development of a science concerned with improvement of quality of care.

Keywords:  Choosing Wisely; Health outcomes; Health spending; Health system performance; Overutilization; Quality of care; Social spending; Underutilization; Value

Year:  2021        PMID: 33871864     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  10 in total

1.  Eliminating waste in US health care.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Andrew D Hackbarth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Add to cart?

Authors:  Ilona Hale
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  From an ethics of rationing to an ethics of waste avoidance.

Authors:  Howard Brody
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Examining quality and efficiency of the U.S. healthcare system.

Authors:  Sameer Kumar; Neha S Ghildayal; Ronak N Shah
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2011

5.  The complex relationship between cost and quality in US health care.

Authors:  Leah A Burke; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Virtual Mentor       Date:  2014-02-01

6.  The mirage of universality: Canada's failure to act on social policy and health care.

Authors:  Andrew Boozary; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Effect of provincial spending on social services and health care on health outcomes in Canada: an observational longitudinal study.

Authors:  Daniel J Dutton; Pierre-Gerlier Forest; Ronald D Kneebone; Jennifer D Zwicker
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Avoidable Mortality Rates Decrease but Inequity Gaps Widen for Marginalized Neighborhoods: A Population-Based Analysis in Ontario, Canada from 1993 to 2014.

Authors:  Austin Zygmunt; Claire E Kendall; Paul James; Isac Lima; Meltem Tuna; Peter Tanuseputro
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-06

9.  Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Irene Papanicolas; Liana R Woskie; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack W O'Sullivan; Ali Albasri; Brian D Nicholson; Rafael Perera; Jeffrey K Aronson; Nia Roberts; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.