Literature DB >> 33871846

Randomized Controlled Trials 2: Analysis.

Robert N Foley1, Patrick S Parfrey2.   

Abstract

When analyzing the results of a trial, the primary outcome variable must be kept in clear focus. In the analysis plan, consideration must be given to comparing the characteristics of the subjects, taking account of differences in these characteristics, intention-to-treat analysis, interim analyses and stopping rules, mortality comparisons, composite outcomes, research design including run-in periods, factorial, stratified and crossover designs, number needed to treat, power issues, multivariate modeling, subgroup analysis, competing risks, and hypothesis-generating analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analysis; Competing risks; Composite outcomes; Intention to treat; Multivariate modeling; Randomized controlled trials; Research design; Statistical power; Stopping rules; Subgroups

Year:  2021        PMID: 33871846     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  1 in total

Review 1.  Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Xin Sun; Matthias Briel; Jason W Busse; John J You; Elie A Akl; Filip Mejza; Malgorzata M Bala; Dirk Bassler; Dominik Mertz; Natalia Diaz-Granados; Per Olav Vandvik; German Malaga; Sadeesh K Srinathan; Philipp Dahm; Bradley C Johnston; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Basil Hassouneh; Stephen D Walter; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Neera Bhatnagar; Douglas G Altman; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-03-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.