S Lopez Gordo1, C Bettonica2, M Miró2, F Estremiana2, H Aranda2, L Farran2. 1. Maresme Health Consortium, Carr de Cirera 230, 08304, Mataró, Barcelona, Spain. slopezgord@csdm.cat. 2. Esofagogastric Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, de La Feixa Llarga, s/n L´Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Gastric and small intestine are the most common gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). There are few studies of patients who underwent surgical treatment with disparate findings. We aimed to evaluate the differences between groups and the risk factors for recurrence and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective study of 96 gastric and 60 small intestine GIST was performed between 1995 and 2015. Both groups were compared in terms of clinicopathologic features, morbidity, recurrence, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS®. RESULTS: Eighty-one gastric GISTs and 56 small intestine GISTs underwent surgical treatment. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common cause of emergency surgery being more frequent in gastric GIST (P = 0.009); however, emergency surgery was indicated more frequently in the small intestinal GIST (P = 0.004) and was mostly due to perforation (P = 0.009). With a median follow-up of 66.9 (39.7-94.8) months, 28 (20.4%) patients had recurrence. A mitotic index > 5 (P ≤ 0.001) and the intestinal location (P = 0.012) were significantly associated to recurrence. Tumor size > 15 cm (P = 0.001) and an age of ≥ 75 years (P = 0.014) were associated to mortality. On univariate analysis, higher mean values of Ki-67 were associated to higher mortality (P = 0.0032). Small intestine GIST presented lower disease-free survival (DFS) than that of gastric GIST (65.7% vs 90.8%) with P = 0.003. The overall survival (OS) of gastric and small intestine GIST was 74.7% and 71.6%, respectively (P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Small intestine GIST received emergency surgery more frequently showing lower DFS and same OS than that of gastric GIST. We found that Ki-67 could be a prognostic factor. Further studies are necessary to assess whether Ki-67 is a prognostic risk factor for GISTs.
PURPOSE: Gastric and small intestine are the most common gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). There are few studies of patients who underwent surgical treatment with disparate findings. We aimed to evaluate the differences between groups and the risk factors for recurrence and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective study of 96 gastric and 60 small intestine GIST was performed between 1995 and 2015. Both groups were compared in terms of clinicopathologic features, morbidity, recurrence, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS®. RESULTS: Eighty-one gastric GISTs and 56 small intestine GISTs underwent surgical treatment. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common cause of emergency surgery being more frequent in gastric GIST (P = 0.009); however, emergency surgery was indicated more frequently in the small intestinal GIST (P = 0.004) and was mostly due to perforation (P = 0.009). With a median follow-up of 66.9 (39.7-94.8) months, 28 (20.4%) patients had recurrence. A mitotic index > 5 (P ≤ 0.001) and the intestinal location (P = 0.012) were significantly associated to recurrence. Tumor size > 15 cm (P = 0.001) and an age of ≥ 75 years (P = 0.014) were associated to mortality. On univariate analysis, higher mean values of Ki-67 were associated to higher mortality (P = 0.0032). Small intestine GIST presented lower disease-free survival (DFS) than that of gastric GIST (65.7% vs 90.8%) with P = 0.003. The overall survival (OS) of gastric and small intestine GIST was 74.7% and 71.6%, respectively (P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Small intestine GIST received emergency surgery more frequently showing lower DFS and same OS than that of gastric GIST. We found that Ki-67 could be a prognostic factor. Further studies are necessary to assess whether Ki-67 is a prognostic risk factor for GISTs.
Authors: Heikki Joensuu; Aki Vehtari; Jaakko Riihimäki; Toshirou Nishida; Sonja E Steigen; Peter Brabec; Lukas Plank; Bengt Nilsson; Claudia Cirilli; Chiara Braconi; Andrea Bordoni; Magnus K Magnusson; Zdenek Linke; Jozef Sufliarsky; Massimo Federico; Jon G Jonasson; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Piotr Rutkowski Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Johanna Andersson; Per Bümming; Jeanne M Meis-Kindblom; Harri Sihto; Nina Nupponen; Heikki Joensuu; Anders Odén; Bengt Gustavsson; Lars-Gunnar Kindblom; Bengt Nilsson Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Andrés Poveda; Xavier García Del Muro; Jose Antonio López-Guerrero; Ricardo Cubedo; Virginia Martínez; Ignacio Romero; César Serrano; Claudia Valverde; Javier Martín-Broto Journal: Cancer Treat Rev Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 12.111
Authors: Marco Novelli; Sabrina Rossi; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Philippe Taniere; Beatrice Seddon; Luisa Toffolatti; Chiara Sartor; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Raf Sciot; Martine Van Glabbeke; Jaap Verweij; Jean Yves Blay; Peter Hohenberger; Adrienne Flanagan; Angelo P Dei Tos Journal: Histopathology Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Kjetil Søreide; Oddvar M Sandvik; Jon Arne Søreide; Vanja Giljaca; Andrea Jureckova; V Ramesh Bulusu Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Ronald P Dematteo; Jason S Gold; Lisa Saran; Mithat Gönen; Kui Hin Liau; Robert G Maki; Samuel Singer; Peter Besmer; Murray F Brennan; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ronald P Dematteo; Karla V Ballman; Cristina R Antonescu; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; George D Demetri; Martin E Blackstein; Charles D Blanke; Margaret von Mehren; Murray F Brennan; Shreyaskumar Patel; Martin D McCarter; Jonathan A Polikoff; Benjamin R Tan; Kouros Owzar Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 79.321