Literature DB >> 33871618

Utilization Rates of Pancreatectomy, Radical Prostatectomy, and Nephrectomy in New York, Ontario, and New South Wales, 2011 to 2018.

Hilary Y M Pang1,2, Kelsey Chalmers3,4, Bruce Landon5,6, Adam G Elshaug7,8, John Matelski9, Vicki Ling10, Monika K Krzyzanowska2,11, Girish Kulkarni2,10,12, Bradley A Erickson13, Peter Cram1,2,10,14.   

Abstract

Importance: Few studies have compared surgical utilization between countries or how rates may differ according to patients' socioeconomic status. Objective: To compare population-level utilization of 3 common nonemergent surgical procedures in New York State (US), Ontario (Canada), and New South Wales (Australia) and how utilization differs for residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included all adults aged 18 years and older who were hospitalized for pancreatectomy, radical prostatectomy, or nephrectomy between 2011 and 2016 in New York, between 2011 and 2018 in Ontario, and between 2013 and 2018 in New South Wales. Each patient's address of residence was linked to 2016 census data to ascertain neighborhood income. Data were analyzed from August 2019 to November 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were (1) each jurisdiction's per capita age- and sex-standardized utilization rates (procedures per 100 000 residents per year) for each surgery and (2) utilization rates among residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods.
Results: This study included 115 428 surgical patients (25 780 [22.3%] women); 5717, 21 752, and 24 617 patients in New York were hospitalized for pancreatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and nephrectomy, respectively; 4929, 19 125, and 16 916 patients in Ontario, respectively; and 2069, 13 499, and 6804 patients in New South Wales, respectively. Patients in New South Wales were older for all procedures (eg, radical prostatectomy, mean [SD] age in New South Wales, 64.8 [7.3] years; in New York, 62.7 [8.4] years; in Ontario, 62.8 [6.7] years; P < .001); patients in New York were more likely than those in other locations to be women for pancreatectomy (New York: 2926 [51.2%]; Ontario: 2372 [48.1%]; New South Wales, 1003 [48.5%]; P = .004) and nephrectomy (New York: 10 645 [43.2%]; Ontario: 6529 [38.6%]; 2605 [38.3%]; P < .001). With the exception of nephrectomy in Ontario, there was a higher annual utilization rate for all procedures in all jurisdictions among patients residing in affluent neighborhoods (quintile 5) compared with poorer neighborhoods (quintile 1). This difference was largest in New South Wales for pancreatectomy (4.65 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 0.28]; P < .001) and radical prostatectomy (73.46 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 1.20]; P < .001); largest in New York for nephrectomy (8.43 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 0.85]; P < .001) and smallest in New York for radical prostatectomy (19.70 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 2.63]; P < .001); and smallest in Ontario for pancreatectomy (1.15 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 0.28]; P < .001) and nephrectomy (-1.10 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 0.52]; P < .001). New York had the highest utilization of nephrectomy (28.93 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.18]) and New South Wales for had the highest utilization of pancreatectomy and radical prostatectomy (6.94 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.15] and 94.37 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.81], respectively; all P < .001). Utilization was lowest in Ontario for all procedures (pancreatectomy, 6.18 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.09]; radical prostatectomy, 49.24 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.36]; nephrectomy, 21.40 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.16]; all P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, New York and New South Wales had higher per capita surgical utilization and larger neighborhood income-utilization gradients than Ontario. These findings suggest that income-based disparities are larger in the United States and Australia and smaller in Canada and highlight trade-offs inherent in the health care systems of different countries.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33871618     DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  6 in total

1.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Are Income-based Differences in TKA Use and Outcomes Reduced in a Single-payer System? A Large-database Comparison of the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Paul A Manner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Are Income-based Differences in TKA Use and Outcomes Reduced in a Single-payer System? A Large-database Comparison of the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Bella Mehta; Kaylee Ho; Vicki Ling; Susan Goodman; Michael Parks; Bheeshma Ravi; Samprit Banerjee; Fei Wang; Said Ibrahim; Peter Cram
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  Getting to 100%: Research Priorities and Unanswered Questions to Inform the US Debate on Universal Health Insurance Coverage.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Harry Selker; Jennifer Carnahan; Santiago Romero-Brufau; Michael A Fischer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Surgical Outcomes in Canada and the United States: An Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Clinical Registry.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Ko; Bruce E Landon; Bruce Hall; Timothy D Jackson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Rates of Low-Value Service in Australian Public Hospitals and the Association With Patient Insurance Status.

Authors:  Juliana de Oliveira Costa; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Adam G Elshaug; Kees van Gool; Louisa R Jorm; Michael O Falster
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01

6.  Variation in revascularisation use and outcomes of patients in hospital with acute myocardial infarction across six high income countries: cross sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Laura A Hatfield; Pieter Bakx; Amitava Banerjee; Christina Fu; Michal Gordon; Renaud Heine; Nicole Huang; Dennis Ko; Lisa M Lix; Victor Novack; Laura Pasea; Feng Qiu; Therese A Stukel; Carin Uyl de Groot; Lin Yan; Bruce Landon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-05-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.