Literature DB >> 33871274

Same family, divergent realities: How triangulation preserves parents' illusory harmony while adolescents navigate interparental conflicts.

Devin M McCauley1, Carlie J Sloan2, Mengya Xia3, Gregory M Fosco1.   

Abstract

Triangulation is a process in which a child is drawn into conflict between two parents, and is linked to adolescent psychological maladjustment. Although harmful, families may engage in triangulation due to its promotion of diverging realities in which youth become more attuned to interparental conflict (IPC), yet parents are distracted from tension within their interparental relationship. Although central to theoretical depictions of triangulation and carrying robust implications for family science and prevention, the phenomenon of diverging realities in triangulating families has received inadequate empirical evaluation. This study utilized data collected from 150 families in which 1 parent and 1 adolescent completed baseline surveys and 21 daily diary questionnaires on triangulation, IPC, and family cohesion. Multilevel models were applied, nesting days within families, to evaluate within-family associations between triangulation and divergent perspectives of family functioning. Results from multilevel models indicated that on days when adolescents experienced elevated triangulation, discrepancies between adolescent and parent reports of IPC and family cohesion increased, with adolescents reporting significantly higher levels of IPC and lower levels of family cohesion relative to their parents. Further probing of the trends driving these discrepancies yielded a distinct pattern of results for IPC and family cohesion. Adolescent involvement in IPC is associated with more negative perspectives of family functioning relative to parents. These findings imply a mechanism through which triangulation confers risk to adolescents, and highlight that divergence in parent and adolescent perspectives of family functioning fluctuates depending on daily processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33871274      PMCID: PMC8336947          DOI: 10.1037/fam0000785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  21 in total

1.  Triangulation and adolescent development in the U.S. and Japan.

Authors:  L G Bell; D C Bell; Y Nakata
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Families as systems.

Authors:  M J Cox; B Paley
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?

Authors:  James A Cranford; Patrick E Shrout; Masumi Iida; Eshkol Rafaeli; Tiffany Yip; Niall Bolger
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07

4.  Congruence and Incongruence in Adolescents' and Parents' Perceptions of the Family: Using Response Surface Analysis to Examine Links with Adolescents' Psychological Adjustment.

Authors:  Lauren J Human; Melanie A Dirks; Anita DeLongis; Edith Chen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-06-10

Review 5.  Families and individual development: provocations from the field of family therapy.

Authors:  P Minuchin
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1985-04

6.  Profiles of cognitive appraisals and triangulation into interparental conflict: Implications for adolescent adjustment.

Authors:  Gregory M Fosco; Bethany C Bray
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2016-03-10

7.  In the eyes of the beholder: cognitive appraisals as mediators of the association between interparental conflict and youth maladjustment.

Authors:  Jean M Gerard; Cheryl Buehler; Karen Franck; Owen Anderson
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2005-09

8.  Parent-Youth Differences in Familism Values from Adolescence into Young Adulthood: Developmental Course and Links with Parent-Youth Conflict.

Authors:  Jenny Padilla; Susan M McHale; Michael J Rovine; Kimberly A Updegraff; Adriana J Umaña-Taylor
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-06-14

9.  Effects of a Brief Psychoeducational Intervention for Family Conflict: Constructive Conflict, Emotional Insecurity and Child Adjustment.

Authors:  Laura E Miller-Graff; E Mark Cummings; Kathleen N Bergman
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2016-10

10.  Children's influence in the marital relationship.

Authors:  Alice C Schermerhorn; E Mark Cummings; Catherine A DeCarlo; Patrick T Davies
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2007-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Family and individual risk factors for triangulation: Evaluating evidence for emotion coaching buffering effects.

Authors:  Devin M McCauley; Gregory M Fosco
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2021-08-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.