Literature DB >> 33871078

Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint loading during a single-leg forward hop following ACL reconstruction.

Prasanna Sritharan1, Anthony G Schache1, Adam G Culvenor1, Luke G Perraton2, Adam L Bryant3, Hayden G Morris4, Timothy S Whitehead5, Kay M Crossley1.   

Abstract

Altered biomechanics are frequently observed following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Yet, little is known about knee-joint loading, particularly in the patellofemoral-joint, despite patellofemoral-joint osteoarthritis commonly occurring post-ACLR. This study compared knee-joint reaction forces and impulses during the landing phase of a single-leg forward hop in the reconstructed knee of people 12-24 months post-ACLR and uninjured controls. Experimental marker data and ground forces for 66 participants with ACLR (28 ± 6 years, 78 ± 15 kg) and 33 uninjured controls (26 ± 5 years, 70 ± 12 kg) were input into scaled-generic musculoskeletal models to calculate joint angles, joint moments, muscle forces, and the knee-joint reaction forces and impulses. The ACLR group exhibited a lower peak knee flexion angle (mean difference: -6°; 95% confidence interval: [-10°, -2°]), internal knee extension moment (-3.63 [-5.29, -1.97] percentage of body weight × participant height (body weight [BW] × HT), external knee adduction moment (-1.36 [-2.16, -0.56]% BW × HT) and quadriceps force (-2.02 [-2.95, -1.09] BW). The ACLR group also exhibited a lower peak patellofemoral-joint compressive force (-2.24 [-3.31, -1.18] BW), net tibiofemoral-joint compressive force (-0.74 [-1.20, 0.28] BW), and medial compartment force (-0.76 [-1.08, -0.44] BW). Finally, only the impulse of the patellofemoral-joint compressive force was lower in the ACLR group (-0.13 [-0.23, -0.03] body weight-seconds). Lower compressive forces are evident in the patellofemoral- and tibiofemoral-joints of ACLR knees compared to uninjured controls during a single-leg forward hop-landing task. Our findings may have implications for understanding the contributing factors for incidence and progression of knee osteoarthritis after ACLR surgery.
© 2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL injury; contact force; knee osteoarthritis; musculoskeletal modelling; posttraumatic

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33871078     DOI: 10.1002/jor.25053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  3 in total

1.  Patellofemoral contact forces after ACL reconstruction: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jack R Williams; Kelsey Neal; Abdulmajeed Alfayyadh; Ashutosh Khandha; Kurt Manal; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Biomechanical Markers of Forward Hop-Landing After ACL-Reconstruction: A Pattern Recognition Approach.

Authors:  Prasanna Sritharan; Mario A Muñoz; Peter Pivonka; Adam L Bryant; Hossein Mokhtarzadeh; Luke G Perraton
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Between-Limb Symmetry in ACL and Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Athletes After ACL Reconstruction and Clearance for Return to Sport.

Authors:  Argyro Kotsifaki; Sam Van Rossom; Rod Whiteley; Vasileios Korakakis; Roald Bahr; Pieter D'Hooghe; Emmanuel Papakostas; Vasileios Sideris; Abdulaziz Farooq; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.