Literature DB >> 33870430

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients with high-risk post-operative complications.

Flavio Roberto Takeda1, Rubens Antonio Aissar Sallum1, Ulysses Ribeiro1, Ivan Cecconello1.   

Abstract

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer is challenging, due to considerable morbidity, especially in high surgical risk patients. While transhiatal esophagectomy leads to good oncological outcomes and reduced postoperative complications, less invasive techniques might further improve outcomes. Our goal was to compare results of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTE) with open transhiatal esophagectomy (OTE) in esophageal cancer patients at high surgical risk. From 2014 to 2020, 128 patients were identified. Seventy received OTE while 51 received LTE. After propensity score matching (1:1), postoperative complications, analysis of overall and disease-free survival, and survival-related prognostic factors were assessed in two groups of 48 patients. Ninety-one (77%) patients were men with a mean age of 65 ± 10.3 years. Those who underwent OTE experienced more clinical and surgical complications. In LTE patients, the number of mean resected lymph nodes was 25.9, and in patients who had OTE, it was 17.4 (P < 0.001). Overall survival was 56.0% in the LTE group and 33.6% (P = 0.023) in the OTE group. In multivariable analysis of overall survival, open surgery and incomplete pathological response were seen as worse negative factors. In multivariable analysis, metastatic lymph nodes, incomplete pathologic response, surgical complications, and a Charlson's index > 2 (P = 0.014) were associated with poor prognosis. Both surgical methods are safe with similar morbidity and mortality; however, LTE was associated with fewer complications, a higher number of resected lymph nodes, better overall survival, and more prognostic factors related to global and disease-free overall survival in high-risk patients.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; esophageal cancers; minimal invasive esophagectomy; transhiatal esophagectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 33870430     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  1 in total

1.  CERVICAL ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS FISTULA FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY: A PROBLEM WITH NO SOLUTION?

Authors:  Flavio Roberto Takeda; Rubens Aissar Sallum; Ivan Cecconello; Sérgio Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.