| Literature DB >> 33870129 |
Andrea Salm1, Sandhya R Krishnan1, Marta Collu1,2, Ombeline Danton3, Matthias Hamburger3, Marco Leonti2, Giovanna Almanza4, Jürg Gertsch1.
Abstract
Globally, more than six million people are infected with Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative protozoan parasite of the vector-borne Chagas disease (CD). We conducted a cross-sectional ethnopharmacological field study in Bolivia among different ethnic groups where CD is hyperendemic. A total of 775 extracts of botanical drugs used in Bolivia in the context of CD and botanical drugs from unrelated indications from the Mediterranean De Materia Medica compiled by Dioscorides two thousand years ago were profiled in a multidimensional assay uncovering different antichagasic natural product classes. Intriguingly, the phylobioactive anthraquinone hotspot matched the antichagasic activity of Senna chloroclada, the taxon with the strongest ethnomedical consensus for treating CD among the Izoceño-Guaraní. Testing common 9,10-anthracenedione derivatives in T. cruzi cellular infection assays demarcates hydroxyanthraquinone as a potential antichagasic lead scaffold. Our study systematically uncovers in vitro antichagasic phylogenetic hotspots in the plant kingdom as a potential resource for drug discovery based on ethnopharmacological hypotheses.Entities:
Keywords: Bioactive Plant Product; Biological Sciences; Ethnobotany; Ethnopharmacology; Natural Product Chemistry; Plant Biology; Plants
Year: 2021 PMID: 33870129 PMCID: PMC8040286 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: iScience ISSN: 2589-0042
Figure 1Ethnopharmacological survey in Bolivia
(A) The three different municipalities (orange), surveyed communities (red dots), and cities (stars) where the field study was conducted are shown.
(B) Graphical summary of the ethnomedical data. The number of informants from the four ethnic groups (Ayoreo, Chiquitano, Guaraní, and Quechua) reporting knowledge of medicinal plants/agents for CD treatment (CD medplant knowledge) and the reported occurrence of CD in the family (CD in family) are shown. See also Figure S1.
Sociodemographic characteristics of the informants in the surveyed rural areas reporting knowledge about medicinal plants for CDa, number of use reports, and reported taxa
| Geographical zone | Total | Gender | Age class | Use | Reported | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| informants | F | M | <40 | 41 to 60 | >60 | reports | taxa | ||
| Ayoreo | Chiquitania | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| Chiquitano | Chiquitania | 68 | 33 | 35 | 22 | 24 | 22 | 199 | 38 |
| Guaraní | Chaco | 54 | 33 | 21 | 19 | 24 | 11 | 93 | 15 |
| Quechua | Inter-Andean valleys | 19 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 42 | 31 |
| Total | 146 | 79 | 67 | 50 | 61 | 35 | 339 | 87 | |
Responses of women sellers in herbal markets in La Paz and Santa Cruz cities are not included in this table.
List of plant species reported to be used in the treatment of Chagas disease and related symptoms by Ayoreo, Chiquitano, Guaraní, and Quechua informants
| Family genus/species | Vernacular name | Used by | Part used | No. use reports | Application | Origin (status) | Habit | Acute or chronic phase | Indication Chagas symptom | Voucher specimen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amaranthaceae | ||||||||||
| | Caré, paico | C | L, R | 17 | Or | N (Cul) | Herb | chro | CAR, GAS | ASMP33 |
| Anacardiaceae | ||||||||||
| | Cuchi | C | B, L | 2 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP56, ASMP6 |
| | Molle | Q | L | 2 | Or, Tp | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR, GAS | ASMP90 |
| Annonaceae | ||||||||||
| | Sinini, Aratiku, Sorimimi | G | L | 5 | Or | N (W) | Shrub | chro | CAR | ASMP11 |
| | Sinini | C | L | 12 | Or | n.d. (Cul) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP41 |
| Apocynaceae | ||||||||||
| | Cacha | C | B | 8 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR, FAT | ASMP35 |
| | Amarguillo, Arakuarembiu | G | L | 3 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP17 |
| Aristolochiaceae | ||||||||||
| | Waje | Q | Br, L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Vine | chro | CAR | ASMP94 |
| Asteraceae | ||||||||||
| | Romero | Q | AP | 2 | Or | N (Cul) | Shrub | chro | FAT | ASMP82 |
| | Guacanqui, Wira wira | C, LP | AP | 6 | Or | N (Cul,Pur) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP45, ASMP103 |
| | Wira wira | Q | AP | 2 | Or | N (W) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP91 |
| | Altamisa | Q | L | 2 | Or | N (W) | Subshrub | chro | CAR | ASMP83 |
| | Carqueja, Kinsa k'ucho | LP, Q | AP | 3 | Or | N (Pur,W) | Herb | chro | CAR, GAS | ASMP28, ASMP85 |
| | Misuka | Q | AP | 1 | Or | N (W) | Herb | chro | PUR | ASMP89 |
| | Sunchuj maman | Q | Fr, L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Shrub | chro | FAT | ASMP75 |
| | K'ia k'ia | LP | AP | 2 | Or | N (Pur) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP102 |
| | Alcachofa | LP, SC | AP | 2 | Or | n.d. (Pur) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP13 |
| | Melinco | Q | L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Shrub | chro | CAR, FAT | ASMP87 |
| | Chinchirkuma | Q | Br, L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Shrub | chro | CAR | ASMP88 |
| | Artemisa, Chupurujumo | C | AP | 1 | Or | N (W) | Herb | acu, chro | FEV, PUR | ASMP59 |
| | 4 Cantos | C | Fl, L | 1 | Or | N (Cul) | Shrub | chro | CAR | ASMP36 |
| | Jayaj pichana | Q | AP | 2 | Or | N (W) | Herb | chro | CAR, FAT | ASMP76 |
| | Diente de Leon | C, LP | AP | 3 | Or | I (Pur) | Herb | chro | CAR | AMP12, ASMP30 |
| | Tabaco | Q | L | 1 | Tp | n.d. (W) | Tree | acu | BIT | ASMP93 |
| Bignoniaceae | ||||||||||
| | Tajibo, Tajibo negro | C, G | B, Fl | 3 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP18, ASMP57 |
| | Paraparau | C | B | 6 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR, FAT | ASMP34 |
| | Paratodo, Alcornoque | C, A | B | 30 | Or | N (Cul) | Tree | chro | CAR, FAT, PUR | ASMP9 |
| Bixaceae | ||||||||||
| | Uruku | C, G | L | 4 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP26 |
| Caricaceae | ||||||||||
| | Papaya | C, G | Fl | 3 | Or | I (Cul) | Tree | chro | CAR, GAS | ASMP38 |
| Cochlospermaceae | ||||||||||
| | Kuari, Pela pela | G | B, L | 8 | Or | N (Cul) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP22 |
| Cucurbitaceae | ||||||||||
| | Balsamina | C | AP | 3 | Or | I (Cul) | Vine | chro | CAR | ASMP58 |
| Ephedraceae | ||||||||||
| | Pisqo simi | Q | AP | 1 | Or | N (W) | Shrub | chro | FAT | ASMP96 |
| Euphorbiaceae | ||||||||||
| | Taporita, Tupeicha | G | R | 5 | Or | N (W) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP21 |
| | K'uru k'uru | Q | La | 1 | Tp | n.d. (W) | Herb | acu | BIT | ASMP92 |
| | Quebra Pedra | C | Wh | 4 | Or | N (Cul) | Herb | chro | CAR, FAT | ASMP49 |
| | Piñón | C | L | 1 | Or | I (Cul) | Treelet | chro | FAT | ASMP39 |
| Fabaceae | ||||||||||
| | Tusca | G | B, Fl | 2 | Or | N (Cul) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP24 |
| | Karikari | C | B | 1 | Or | n.d. (Cul) | Tree | chro | PUR | ASMP43 |
| | Patecabra | C | L | 1 | Or | n.d. (Cul) | Shrub | acu, chro | FEV, PUR | ASMP42 |
| | Copaibo | C, SC | B | 5 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP51 |
| | Amorocita | Q | L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Herb | chro | FAT | ASMP95 |
| | Paquío | C | B | 3 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR, FAT | ASMP55 |
| | Pezoe | C | Se | 2 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | FAT | ASMP52 |
| | Lanza lanza, Mbuijare, Retama | G | Fl, R, Wh | 45 | Or | N (W) | Shrub | acu, chro | CAR, FEV | ASMP10 |
| | Retama | A, SC | AP | 3 | Or | I (Pur) | Shrub | chro | CAR | ASMP100 |
| Gesneriaceae | ||||||||||
| | Ortelón | C | AP | 2 | Or | N (Cul) | Herb | chro | CAR, FAT | ASMP40 |
| Gramineae | ||||||||||
| | Paja de cedrón | C, G, SC | L | 25 | Or | I (Cul) | Herb | chro | CAR, FAT | ASMP31 |
| Labiatae | ||||||||||
| | Huayra Muña | Q | Br, Fl, L | 2 | Or | N (Cul) | Subshrub | chro | CAR | ASMP80 |
| | Raq'acho | Q | L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Shrub | chro | CAR | ASMP81 |
| | Muña | Q | AP | 3 | Or | N (Cul) | Subshrub | chro | FAT, GAS | ASMP69 |
| | Albahaca | C | Wh | 2 | Or | I (Cul) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP48 |
| | Sábila, karaguata guasu | C, G | La | 5 | Tp | I (Cul) | Herb | acu | BIT, PUR | ASMP25 |
| Linaceae | ||||||||||
| | Linaza | Q | Fr | 2 | Or | I (Cul) | Herb | chro | PUR | ASMP71 |
| Malpighiaceae | ||||||||||
| | Masiaré | A, C | R | 11 | Or | N (Cul) | Herb | chro | CAR, FAT | ASMP32 |
| sterile | Azucaró | C | B | 4 | Or | n.d. (W) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP54 |
| Malvaceae | ||||||||||
| | Malva | LP, Q | AP | 2 | Or | I (Cul,Pur) | Herb | chro | CAR, FAT, GAS | ASMP77, ASMP15 |
| Meliaceae | ||||||||||
| | Tipa | C, SC | B | 11 | Or | n.d. (Cul) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP53 |
| Myrtaceae | ||||||||||
| | Guapurú | Q | L | 1 | Tp | N (W) | Tree | chro | FAT | ASMP73 |
| | K'arasacha | Q | L | 2 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR, GAS | ASMP72 |
| | Guapurú | C | L | 1 | Or | N (Cul) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP60 |
| Oxalidaceae | ||||||||||
| | Sultaki | Q | R | 1 | Tp | N (W) | Herb | chro | FAT | ASMP70 |
| Papaveraceae | ||||||||||
| | Cardo Santo | C, G | Fl | 3 | N (W) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP20 | |
| | Turumi | Q | L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | FAT | ASMP97 |
| Passifloraceae | ||||||||||
| | Pachío, Mburukuya | C, G | Fl, L, R | 13 | Or | N (W) | Vine | chro | CAR, FAT | ASMP16 |
| Piperaceae | ||||||||||
| | Matico | C | L | 7 | Or | N (Cul,W) | Shrub | chro | FAT, PUR | ASMP50, ASMP46 |
| Plantaginaceae | ||||||||||
| | Llantén | C | Fl, L | 3 | Or | I (Cul) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP47 |
| Polygalaceae | ||||||||||
| | T'ian t'ian | Q | L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP84 |
| Rosaceae | ||||||||||
| | Kari kari | LP | AP | 2 | Or | n.d. (Pur) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP101 |
| Rutaceae | ||||||||||
| | Kapi | Q | L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Shrub | chro | GAS | ASMP86 |
| | Ruda | Q | L | 1 | Or | I (Cul) | Herb | chro | GAS, PUR | ASMP99 |
| | Chirimolle | Q | L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP74 |
| Solanaceae | ||||||||||
| | Andrés Huaylla | LP, Q | AP, L | 2 | Or | N (Cul,Pur) | Shrub | chro | CAR, GAS | ASMP78, ASMP14 |
| | Pica Pica | C | L, R | 1 | Or | N (Cul) | Subshrub | chro | PUR | ASMP44 |
| Urticaceae | ||||||||||
| | Ortiga | LP | AP | 1 | Or | I (Pur) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP29 |
| Valerianaceae | ||||||||||
| | Jama jama | Q | B, L | 1 | Or | N (W) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP98 |
| Verbenaceae | ||||||||||
| | Cedrón | C, Q | L | 4 | Or | N (Cul) | Shrub | chro | CAR | ASMP79 |
| | Poleo | C | AP | 2 | Or | N (Cul) | Shrub | chro | CAR | ASMP37 |
| Zingiberaceae | ||||||||||
| | Colonia | C, G, SC | Fl | 26 | Or | I (Cul) | Herb | chro | CAR | ASMP19 |
| Zygophyllaceae | ||||||||||
| | Guayacán, Guayacán Morado | C, G | B | 3 | Or | N (Cul) | Tree | chro | CAR | ASMP23 |
A, Ayoreo; C, Chiquitano; G, Guaraní; LP, La Paz; SC, Santa Cruz; AP, aerial parts; B, bark; Br, branches; Fl, flowers; Fr, fruit; La, latex; L, leaves; R, roots; Se, seeds; Wh, whole plant; Or, oral application; Tp, topical application; N, native; I, introduced; n.d., not determined; Cul, cultivated; Pur, purchased at market; W, wild; chro, chronic; acu, acute; BIT, vinchuca bite; CAR, cardiovascular symptoms; FEV, fever; GAS, gastro digestive symptoms; FAT, fatigue; PUR, purifier/blood purifier/to strengthen the blood.
Figure 2Biological profiling of the CD botanical drug library collected in Bolivia
Few EtOAc extracts showed selective toxicity toward T. cruzi epimastigotes (Y strain) with IC50 values below 20 μg/mL (arrows). A high number of extracts were toxic for procyclic T. brucei, and many showed antiproliferative effects in HeLa and Raw 264.7 cells. The Leguminosae was the only subfamily cluster (top) showing no activities up to 25 μg/mL. In the sesquiterpene lactone-rich family Asteraceae, only Acanthostyles buniifolius showed selective antitrypanosomal effects. Data represent profiling values (based on IC50 values) from at least two independent screening assays, each performed in triplicates. See also Table S1 and Figure S2.
Figure 3FACS parasite release assay in 0.5% FBS and serum-free host cell conditions
(A) Representative FACS histograms of the FL-1 channel (488/530 nm) showing parasites released into the medium from host cells in no FBS and 0.5% hiFBS cells infected with wild-type trypomastigotes. The vehicle control, benznidazole (BZN) treatment at 20 μM, and no infection control are shown. All samples were stained with the SYTO9 dye. Data are representative of at least six independent experiments.
(B) Measurement of reactive oxygen species in CHO-K1 cells cultured in the different FBS conditions. ROS levels were measured using the indicator DCFDA by FACS after 24 hr of exposure to different medium conditions. Control cells were cultured in complete medium. Bar graphs represent the mean fold change in the geometric mean of fluorescence intensity ±SD and were analyzed using FlowJo from three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Statistical significance was calculated with t test. ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Figure 4Comparative profiling of the DMM library from the Mediterranean
Phylobioactivity tree displaying phylogenetic relationships associated with bioactivities of EtOAc extracts. The outer ring shows growth inhibition on T. cruzi epimastigotes, and the inner ring shows growth inhibition of HeLa cells (both at 25 μg/mL; only most active plant part shown). A hypothetical coumarin cluster (aRuta chalepensis root, Levisticum officinale seeds, and Seseli tortuosum root) and the anthraquinone cluster (Rumex crispus and Rheum rhaponticum rhizoma) are visible. Laurus nobilis root and fruits and Sium sisarum root (microfractionated) are indicated in the phylogenic tree. Detailed data on plant species and activities are shown in Table S2.
Figure 5Microfractionation of selected extracts and identification of antitrypanosomal natural products
Bioactivity-guided microfractionation is exemplified with R. crispus using liquid chromatography and photodiode array (PDA) and evaporative light scattering detectors (ELSD). Isolation of antichagasic metabolites was based on epimastigote proliferation inhibition. False negatives are a limitation of this qualitative approach (shown here with chrysophanol) due to low concentrations. Nepodin and emodin/torachrysone were identified and isolated from fully active fractions (0% cell viability). The moderately active chrysophanol was identified in a negative fraction. Controls: BZN, benznidazole; Nifx, nifurtimox.
In vitro antiproliferative activity (50% inhibition [IC50]) of compounds isolated from plant extracts on T. cruzi epimastigote stage (72 hr) and trypomastigote release (6 dpi)
| Isolated cpd | IC50 epimastigotes [μM] | Percentage inhibition of parasite release (serum-free) at 5 μM | Cytotoxicity CC50 CHO cells [μM] | Cytotoxicity CC50 CHO cells without FBS [μM] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nepodin | 28.7 ± 13.3 | 34.7 ± 30.9 | >100 | n.d |
| Torachrysone | >50 | 25.9 ± 15.5 | >100 | n.d |
| Emodin | 14.1 ± 8.2 | 61.5 ± 18.2 | >100 | n.d |
| Falcarindiol | >50 | 0 | >100 | n.d |
| Costunolide | 7.4 ± 5.9 | 0 | 10.9 ± 3.7 | 35.4 ± 13.8 |
| Reynosin | >50 | 50.0 ± 47.1 | 31.3 ± 8.0 | 66.1 ± 1.2 |
| Santamarine | 19.5 ± 9.3 | 55.9 ± 46.7 | 13.2 ± 4.3 | 39.4 ± 1.5 |
| Zaluzanin C | 6.7 ± 0.7 | 71.0 ± 7.5 | 6.6 ± 1.7 | 19.2 ± 5.2 |
| 3-Acetylzaluzanin C | 6.3 ± 0.9 | 83.0 ± 10.1 | 6.9 ± 2.4 | n.d |
| Dehydrocostus lactone | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 86.2 ± 4.1 | 5.8 ± 1.9 | 12.2 ± 0.5 |
| Eremanthin | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 87.6 ± 9.9 | 7.3 ± 1.4 | 11.5 ± 0.2 |
| BZN (20 μM) | 13.8 ± 2.9 | 76.9 ± 15.2 | >100 | n.d |
Cytotoxic (antiproliferative) effects of the compounds were assessed on CHO host cells after 72 hr (50% cytotoxic concentration [CC50]). Data shown are mean values ±SD of at least three independent experiments, each performed in triplicates. n.d, not determined; BZN, benznidazole.
Rumex crispus root.
Sium sisarum root.
Rheum rhaponticum root.
Laurus nobilis leaf.
In vitro antiproliferative activity of anthraquinones on T. cruzi epimastigotes (72 hr) and GFP-expressing trypomastigotes release (6 dpi)
| ID | IC50 epimastigotes | Percentage inhibition of parasite release | CC50 CHO cells [μM] | Selectivity Index (CC50 CHO/IC50 Epi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | >50 | 22.2 ± 9.6 | >100 | n.d |
| 2 | 14.1 ± 8.1 | 24.8 ± 12.9 | >100 | >7 |
| 3 | >50 | 48.3 ± 18.1 | 59.5 ± 10.1 | n.d. |
| 4 | >50 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 5 | >50 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 6 | >50 | 68.5 ± 19.2 | 38.1 ± 16.0 | <1 |
| 7 | >50 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 8 | 5.3 ± 2.3 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 9 | >50 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 10 | 6.6 ± 3.5 | 22.6 ± 17.2 | 35.7 ± 7.4 | 5.4 |
| 11 | 14.5 ± 5.6 | 44.0 ± 17.6 | 42.0 ± 15.5 | 2.9 |
| 12 | 6.4 ± 3.7 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 13 | >50 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 14 | >50 | 20.9 ± 9.7 | 88.9 ± 8.9 | n.d. |
| 15 | >50 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 16 | >50 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 17 | 32.9 ± 13.9 | 46.8 ± 25.6 | >100 | >3 |
| 18 | >50 | 0 | n.d. | n.d. |
| BZN | 13.8 ± 2.9 | 84.9 ± 4.8 | >100 | >7 |
Compounds that inhibited >20% parasite release in the trypomastigote infection assay at a single concentration of 5 μM when cultured with 0.5% hiFBS were tested for antiproliferative effects on CHO host cells. Data shown are mean values ±SD of at least three independent experiments, each performed in triplicates. n.d., not determined; BZN, benznidazole.
IC50 values of the compounds against epimastigotes were assessed as described in the transparent methods.
The percentage inhibition of parasite release by the compounds was estimated at a single concentration (5 μM) as described in transparent methods.
Figure 6FACS parasite release assay using the GFP-expressing T. cruzi strain and reduced potency of benznidazole in serum-free culture conditions
(A) Representative FACS histograms of the FL1 channel (488/530 nm) showing parasites released into the medium from host cells in 0.5% hiFBS cells infected with GFP-expressing trypomastigotes. The samples were prepared by fixing the released trypomastigotes in 4% paraformaldehyde as described in transparent methods. The vehicle control, benznidazole (BZN) treatment at 20 μM, and no infection control are shown. Data show mean values ± SD of at least 6 independent experiments.
(B) Dose-dependent inhibition of parasite release by BZN under low and high ROS conditions. Data show mean values ±SD of at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate. See also Figure S3.
Chemical structures of natural and synthetic anthraquinones tested on T. cruzi
| ID | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | R8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthraquinone | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | |
| Emodin | OH | H | OH | H | H | CH3 | H | OH | |
| Purpurin | OH | OH | H | OH | H | H | H | H | |
| Alizarin | OH | OH | H | H | H | H | H | H | |
| Alizarin Red S | OH | OH | SO3Na | H | H | H | H | H | |
| Quinizarin | OH | H | H | OH | H | H | H | H | |
| Anthrarufin | OH | H | H | H | OH | H | H | H | |
| Dantron | OH | H | H | H | H | H | H | OH | |
| Anthraflavic acid | H | OH | H | H | H | OH | H | H | |
| Chrysophanol | OH | H | CH3 | H | H | H | H | OH | |
| Aloe-emodin | OH | H | CH2OH | H | H | H | H | OH | |
| Physcion | OH | H | OCH3 | H | H | CH3 | H | OH | |
| 2-Hydroxy-3-methylanthraquinone | H | OH | CH3 | H | H | H | H | H | |
| 2-Hydroxy-1-methylanthraquinone | CH3 | OH | H | H | H | H | H | H | |
| Rhein | H | COOH | H | OH | OH | H | H | H | |
| Diacerein | H | COOH | H | O(C=O)CH3 | O(C=O)CH3 | H | H | H | |
| Disperse Red11 | NH2 | OCH3 | H | NH2 | H | H | H | H | |
| Aurantio-obtusin | OH | OCH3 | OH | H | H | CH3 | OH | OCH3 | |
Figure 7Emodin potency is dependent on serum and host cell ROS concentration
(A) Dose-dependent inhibition of parasite release by emodin under serum and no serum (low and high ROS) conditions.
(B) Dose-dependent inhibition of parasite release by hydroxyanthraquinones which inhibited more than 25% release at 5 μM using 0.5% hiFBS (low ROS): purpurin, aloe-emodin, quinizarin, and disperse Red11. Data represent the average ± SD of three independent experiments each performed in triplicate.