Literature DB >> 33870117

A Practical, Clinical User-Friendly Format for Breast Ultrasound Report.

Sadaf Alipour1,2, Bita Eslami1, Mahboubeh Abedi1,3, Nasrin Ahmadinejad4,5, Ali Arabkheradmand6, Arvin Aryan4, Khadijeh Bakhtavar7, Leila Bayani1,3, Ahmad Elahi1,8, Masoumeh Gity1,4, Maryam Rahmani4, Nahid Sedighi4, Adel Yazdankhahkenari9, Ramesh Omranipour1,10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Breast ultrasound (BUS) is often performed as an adjunct to mammography in breast cancer screening or for evaluating breast lesions. Our aim was to design a practical and user-friendly format for BUS that could include the details of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: As a team of radiologists and surgeons trained in the management of breast diseases, we gathered and carried out the project in four phases-literature search and collection of present report formats, summarizing key points and preparing the first draft, seeking expert opinion and preparing the final format, and pilot testing-followed by a survey was answered by the research team's radiologists and surgeons.
RESULTS: It produced a list of items to be stated in the BUS report, the final BUS report format, and the pilot format guide. Then, the radiologists used the format in three active ultrasound units in university-affiliated centers, and reports were referred to the surgeons. At the end of the project, the survey showed a high degree of ease of use, clarity, conciseness, comprehensiveness, and well-classified structure of the report format; but radiologists believed that the new organization took more time.
CONCLUSION: We propose our design as a user-friendly and practical format for BUS reports. It should be used for a longer time and by various ultrasound centers in order to ascertain its benefits. ©Copyright 2021 by Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Associations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; breast diseases; ultrasonography

Year:  2021        PMID: 33870117      PMCID: PMC8025719          DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.6344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  13 in total

1.  BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lazarus; Martha B Mainiero; Barbara Schepps; Susan L Koelliker; Linda S Livingston
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  BIRADS ultrasonography.

Authors:  L Levy; M Suissa; J F Chiche; G Teman; B Martin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses.

Authors:  Nouf Abdullah; Benoît Mesurolle; Mona El-Khoury; Ellen Kao
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Zheng Zhang; Daniel Lehrer; Roberta A Jong; Etta D Pisano; Richard G Barr; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Mary C Mahoney; W Phil Evans; Linda H Larsen; Marilyn J Morton; Ellen B Mendelson; Dione M Farria; Jean B Cormack; Helga S Marques; Amanda Adams; Nolin M Yeh; Glenna Gabrielli
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Redefining the sensitivity of screening mammography: A review.

Authors:  Alan B Hollingsworth
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Breast disease and the general surgeon. II. Effect of audit on the referral of patients with breast problems.

Authors:  C Dawson; M W Armstrong; J Michaels; R G Faber
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes?

Authors:  Margarita Posso; Javier Louro; Mar Sánchez; Marta Román; Carmen Vidal; María Sala; Marisa Baré; Xavier Castells
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark.

Authors:  My von Euler-Chelpin; Martin Lillholm; Ilse Vejborg; Mads Nielsen; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Mammographic Density and Screening Sensitivity, Breast Cancer Incidence and Associated Risk Factors in Danish Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Elsebeth Lynge; Ilse Vejborg; Zorana Andersen; My von Euler-Chelpin; George Napolitano
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.