Chatterjee Amit1, Gajanan Sathe2,3, Abinaya Shunmugam4, Prasanna Kumar Athyala1, Vivek Ghose2, Srujana Chitipothu5, Narayanan Janakiraman1, Ramaprabhu Sundara4, Sailaja V Elchuri1. 1. Department of Nanobiotechnology, Vision Research Foundation, Chennai 600006, India. 2. Institute of Bioinformatics, Bangalore 560066, Karnataka, India. 3. Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India. 4. Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai 600036, India. 5. Central Research Instrumentation Facility, Core Lab, Vision Research Foundation, Chennai 600006, India.
Abstract
For scaffold and imaging applications, nanomaterials such as graphene and its derivatives have been widely used. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is among one such derivative of graphenes, which draws strong consideration due to its physicochemical properties and photocatalytic activity. To use g-C3N4 for biological applications, such as molecular imaging or drug delivery, it must interact with the epithelium, cross the epithelial barrier, and then come in contact with the extracellular matrix of the fibroblast cells. Thus, it becomes essential to understand its molecular mechanism of action. Hence, in this study, to understand the molecular reprogramming associated with g-C3N4, global gene expression using DNA microarrays and proteomics using tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling and mass spectrometry were performed in epithelial and fibroblast cells, respectively. Our results showed that g-C3N4 can cross the epithelial barrier by regulating the adherens junction proteins. Further, using g-C3N4-PDMS scaffolds as a mimic of the extracellular matrix for fibroblast cells, the common signaling pathways were identified between the epithelium and fibroblast cells. These pathways include Wnt signaling, integrin signaling, TGF-β signaling, cadherin signaling, oxidative stress response, ubiquitin proteasome pathway, and EGF receptor signaling pathways. These altered signature pathways identified could play a prominent role in g-C3N4-mediated cellular interactions in both epithelial and fibroblast cells. Additionally, β catenin, EGFR, and MAP2K2 protein-protein interaction networks could play a prominent role in fibroblast cell proliferation. The findings could further our knowledge on g-C3N4-mediated alterations in cellular molecular signatures, enabling the potential use of these materials for biological applications such as molecular imaging and drug delivery.
For scaffold and imaging applications, nanomaterials such as graphene and its derivatives have been widely used. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is among one such derivative of graphenes, which draws strong consideration due to its physicochemical properties and photocatalytic activity. To use g-C3N4 for biological applications, such as molecular imaging or drug delivery, it must interact with the epithelium, cross the epithelial barrier, and then come in contact with the extracellular matrix of the fibroblast cells. Thus, it becomes essential to understand its molecular mechanism of action. Hence, in this study, to understand the molecular reprogramming associated with g-C3N4, global gene expression using DNA microarrays and proteomics using tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling and mass spectrometry were performed in epithelial and fibroblast cells, respectively. Our results showed that g-C3N4 can cross the epithelial barrier by regulating the adherens junction proteins. Further, using g-C3N4-PDMS scaffolds as a mimic of the extracellular matrix for fibroblast cells, the common signaling pathways were identified between the epithelium and fibroblast cells. These pathways include Wnt signaling, integrin signaling, TGF-β signaling, cadherin signaling, oxidative stress response, ubiquitin proteasome pathway, and EGF receptor signaling pathways. These altered signature pathways identified could play a prominent role in g-C3N4-mediated cellular interactions in both epithelial and fibroblast cells. Additionally, β catenin, EGFR, and MAP2K2 protein-protein interaction networks could play a prominent role in fibroblast cell proliferation. The findings could further our knowledge on g-C3N4-mediated alterations in cellular molecular signatures, enabling the potential use of these materials for biological applications such as molecular imaging and drug delivery.
Graphene
is a two-dimensional sheet of sp2 hybridized
carbons arranged in a honeycomb lattice.[1] Graphene nanoparticles have applications in various fields such
as electronics, energy, bioremediation, and nanomedicine.[2] Graphene has a wide array of applications in
the field of nanomedicine because of its enormous available surface
area, simplicity of functionalization, elevated solubility, exceptional
drug-loading capacities, and lipophilic nature.[3] Recently, its communication with the plasma membrane and
its uptake mechanism have received considerable attention.[4] The physiochemical properties of graphene play
a prominent role in its uptake. The nanomaterials could enter the
cells through the process of endocytosis or passive absorbance through
the cellular surface.[5]There are
many derivatives of graphene that have been studied widely
such as graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), graphane
(hydrogenated form of graphene), graphone (semihydrogenated form of
graphene), flurographene graphitic carbon nitride, etc. Among the
various graphene nanoparticles, GO and rGO have been mostly studied
for biological applications, which includes their ability to target
cancer stem cells.[6] Additionally, GO is
nontoxic to normal fibroblast cells. However, the nanomaterial caused
several side effects. At nonlethal concentrations, it induced brain
toxicity, mitochondrial damage, and cytoskeleton dysregulation.[7] Treatment of GO and amino-functionalized graphene
oxide to immune cells stimulated the polarization of T-cells and initiated
immune response.[8]Graphitic carbon
nitride (g-C3N4) is widely
utilized as a preferred nanomaterial in optoelectronics, energy storage
sensors, and photocatalysis.[9] Additionally,
it is widely used for pollutant degradation.[10] Bulk synthesis of g-C3N4 is obtained by pyrolysis
of plentiful nitrogen-containing precursors, such as melamine, thiourea,
urea, and cyanamide.[11] Tri-s-triazine (C6N7) and S-triazine
(C3N3) rings constitute g-C3N4 molecules.[12] Thecarbon and nitrogen
atoms in g-C3N4 form chemical bonds through
sp2 hybridizations, forming a pie-conjugated delocalized
system, and this material is an n-type semiconductor.[13] Recently, its application in photodynamic therapy without
utilizing any other molecules as enhancers, for cancer therapy, has
been reported. In response to variation in pH, g-C3N4 exhibited altered drug release kinetics, enabling its use
in delivering drugs efficiently.[14] This
nanomaterial has been widely used as a photoelectronic biosensor;
for example, Li et al. developed a sensitive method for detecting
PKA.[15] g-C3N4 nanoparticles
have quantum confinement, edge effects, and optical tenability properties,
which enable these particles to emit both blue and green lights.[16] Therefore, g-C3N4 nanoparticles
are widely used for imaging the cells. Further, g-C3N4 has also been used as an antiviral substance to treat water-borne
diseases.[17] These nanoparticles were made
into composites for various applications. The antioxidant property
of biological fluids was analyzed by integrating the g-C3N4 nanoparticles with polydopamine.[18] AuNPs and g-C3N4 composites exhibited
excellent peroxidase activity and were used for bacterial wound inactivation.[19] Additionally, g-C3N4 nanoparticles
possess an advantage as photosensitizers. Its property of a mild band
gap of 2.7 eV was used for photodynamic therapy. However, its ability
to absorb visible light has practical limitations. Therefore, g-C3N4 is combined with high-functioning nanomaterials,
such as lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs), for various
applications.[20] Additionally, g-C3N4 nanoparticles have not been used extensively as cell
culture scaffolds because of their structural weaknesses, nonconducting
nature, and solubility issues. Therefore, combining these nanoparticles
with various polymers has been a new avenue in the field of advanced
materials.[21]The epithelial and fibroblast
cells constitute the cellular makeup
of organs. Epithelial cells are the first line of defense and are
tightly arranged in monolayers. They protect underneath layers, allow
diffusion of molecules, and form boundaries.[22] Beneath the epithelium layer, fibroblast cells are located, forming
the structural framework of an organ. Fibroblast cells synthesize
the extracellular matrix, which acts as a supportive framework for
epithelial cells.[23] Epithelial cells containing
tight and adherens junctions act as barriers preventing the entry
of therapeutic molecules to the stroma where the fibroblast resides.
However, nanoparticles, liposomes, and cell-penetrating peptides have
the ability to cross the epithelial barrier and reach the stroma.[24−26]Therefore, it is essential to identify the pathways that are
affected
by nanoparticles in both epithelial and fibroblast cells.[27] Among various molecules used for delivery or
imaging for biological applications, graphene and its derivatives
play an important role. Among all of the derivatives of graphene,
g-C3N4 is the least well-characterized derivative
for biological applications. Thus, it becomes important to understand
the molecular signaling pathways regulated by g-C3N4 and to understand whether the signaling pathways are specific
to the material or dependent on the types of cells used for the studies.
Therefore, to resolve this issue, we treated g-C3N4 to MCF-7 cells that are epithelial in origin and we grew
Tenon fibroblast cells on g-C3N4–poly(dimethylsiloxane)
(PDMS) scaffolds as extracellular mimics for studying molecular changes in both cell
types. We studied the signaling pathway induced by g-C3N4 in MCF-7 cells using DNA microarrays. Additionally,
the global altered protein expression of fibroblast cells grown on
g-C3N4–PDMS scaffolds was determined
by proteomics, using tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling and mass spectrometry.
The signaling pathways dysregulated in both cell types were analyzed
to identify the specific pathways regulated by g-C3N4.
Materials and Methods
Synthesis
of g-C3N4
Graphitic carbon nitrite
was prepared as reported earlier by us.[28] Briefly, the material was obtained by heating
melamine at 550 °C for 4 h in a tubular furnace in an air atmosphere
at a ramp rate of 2.3 °C/min in a ceramic crucible.
Size Determination of g-C3N4 Using Dynamic
Light Scattering and Scanning Electron Microscope
The sizes
of g-C3N4 were measured using Zetasizer
Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, U.K.) containing a 4 mW He–Ne
laser. The wavelength of measurements was 633 nm. The g-C3N4 concentration used for measurements was 1 μg/mL.
A 1 cm light path was used, and the intensity of scattered light gathered
at the 173° angle enabled surface potential measurement. The
hydrodynamic size of g-C3N4 was measured in
disposable cuvettes.g-C3N4 samples were
coated with a 10 nm layer of gold by splutter-coating and imaged using
a scanning electron microscope (SEC Co., Ltd., Korea).
X-ray Diffraction and Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed on g-C3N4 nanoparticles. The radiation source used was
Cu Kα in the 0–50° range. For Fourier transform
infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy measurements, g-C3N4 dried samples were mixed with KBr for analysis and spectra were
recorded using a Bruker Tenzor 27 instrument.
g-C3N4 Uptake in MCF-7
MCF-7 cells were obtained
from ATCC, and these cells were maintained
in theDMEM medium with 10% FBS. Different concentrations of g-C3N4 were treated for 1 and 24 h, and uptakes were
studied using a fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Axio Observer).
The uptake of g-C3N4 was visualized by TEM measurements
after 24 h at a concentration of 50 μg/mL.
Mitochondrial Localization
MCF-7
cells treated with g-C3N4 and TF grown on PDMS–g-C3N4 scaffolds along with respective control cells
were incubated with a 150 nM mitotracker (M7512, Thermo Fisher). The
incubation time was 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were washed with
PBS thrice to remove excess stain followed by observations under a
fluorescence microscope.
Microarray Gene Expression
Studies in MCF-7
Cells and Data Analysis
Global gene expression analysis was
performed using Affymetrix Human Prime view arrays according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. In total, 2 × 106 MCF-7 cells were seeded and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10%
FBS in triplicates. The cells were washed thrice with 1× PBS
and incubated with g-C3N4 nanoparticles (50
μg/mL) for 48 h. The cells were washed, trypsinized with 0.01%
trypsin–EDTA, and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min. The pellet
was washed twice with 1× PBS; RNA was extracted using an RNeasy
mini kit (Qiagen), and RNA was quantified using a nanodrop. A total
of 100 ng of RNA was taken to perform the Affymetrix microarray. cDNA
and aRNA were synthesized. The aRNA was labeled with biotin, quantified
using Bionanospec and fragmented, made a hybridization mixture (130
μL), loaded onto GeneChipPrimeView chip arrays, and hybridized
at 45 °C for 16 h using the Affymetrix Gene Chip hybridization
oven. The arrays were washed and stained using buffers A, B, and C
using Affymetrix fluidic station 450 and scanned for fluorescence
signal using the Affymetrix Genechip scanner (3000 G) at 570 nm. The
flowchart for the transcriptomics is represented in Figure S1.
Microarray Data Analysis
The raw
files obtained from the scanner were checked again with Affymerix
Expression console software (Version 4.0), which generated the .CHP
files. The gene expression analysis was performed using Gene Spring
Software (Version 13.0) (AgilentTechnologies, Santa Clara, CA). The
.CEL files were loaded to gene spring software, and the grouping was
done. Quality control was monitored with respect to filtering of the
probeset by expression and by error. The normalized raw data was submitted
to theNCBI gene expression Omnibus (GSE104939). The statistical analysis
was performed individually between the control vs g-C3N4 treatments using Gene Spring software (Version 13.0). The
data was analyzed using p-value 0.02, and multiple
testing correlations were done using the Benjamin–Hochberg
FDR using default settings. A moderated t-test was
used for statistical analysis. Gene expression changes greater than
2.0-fold alteration (p-value of 0.001) were used
for further analysis. Gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed using
the FunRich annotation tool and PANTHER. The gene ontology was also
performed using the DAVID annotation tool, and KEGG pathways with
fold enrichment, p-values, and FDR were calculated.
Western Blotting
The cells were harvested
after g-C3N4 treatment, and proteins were extracted
in RIPA buffer. The proteins were separated by SDS PAGE and blotted
onto the nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking primary antibodies
β catenin (Abcam-ab22656), E cadherin (CST Cat No. 9961) were
treated overnight followed by addition of a secondary antibody for
visualization.
Functionalization of PDMS
Thepoly(dimethylsiloxane)
(PDMS) gel (Sylgard 184 silicone elastomer kit) was prepared in a
1:10 polymer/curing agent ratio. The solution was kept for 24 h at
80 °C for drying and then coated with g-C3N4. The dried PDMS scaffold was dipped in 50 μg/mL g-C3N4 solution and dried at 60 °C for 1 h. This process
was repeated twice more for efficient g-C3N4 coating followed by 2 h of drying. The gels were prepared in tissue
culture plates for the growth of cells.
Tenon
Fibroblast (TF)
Tenon fibroblast
cells were isolated from patients undergoing trabeulectomy surgery
after the approval by the Institutional Review Board of Vision Research
Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India (Ethics No. 635-2017-P).
The tenon fibroblast (TF) cells were grown on TCP-, PDMS-, and PDMS-coated
g-C3N4. Tenon fibroblast cells were maintained
in DMEM F-12 medium having 10% FBS.
Immunofluorescence
MCF-7 cells were
grown for 48 h. g-C3N4-treated cells and control
cells were used for immunofluorescence studies. Tenon fibroblast cells
were grown on g-C3N4–PDMS scaffolds for
72 h. The cells grown on tissue culture plates served as controls
for these cells. They were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized
with 0.5% triton-100 followed by PBS washing. The cells were blocked
with 1% BSA for 1 h followed by overnight incubation with the primary
antibody pCDC25C (Thermo Fisher Cat No. PA5-38358) and Vimentin (CST
Cat No. 5741) for MCF-7 and TF cells, respectively. TheCy3.5-labeled
secondary antibody was used for detection by fluorescence microscopy.
The cell nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst fluorescent stain
(Thermo Fisher Cat No. 33342).
TMT
Labeling and Proteomics of TF
The flowchart for proteomics
is represented in Figure S1. The cells
grown on thegraphene and control tissue
culture plates were lysed in 4% SDS. The control and graphene protein
samples were reduced and alkylated in equal amounts. Then, the proteins
were precipitated with ice-cold acetone. Proteins were digested in
lys-C (1:100) for a period of 4 h and treated with trypsin digestion
at a 1:20 ratio for a 12–16 h period at 37 °C temperature.
The Sep-Pak C18 column material was used for peptide purification.
These peptides were labeled using TMT tags according to the manufacturer’s
instructions (Catalog No. 90110, Thermo Fisher Scientific). TMT tags
126, 127, and 128 were used to label control samples, and graphene
samples were labeled with TMT tags 129, 130, and 131. Then, the samples
were pooled and analyzed on the mass spectrometer (Orbitrap Fusion
Tribrid mass spectrometer, Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) interfaced
with a liquid chromatography system (Easy-nLC 1200 nanoflow, Thermo
Scientific, Bremen, Germany). Peptides were separated on 75 μm
× 50 cm (RSLC C18) analytical columns. The flow rate of the elluted
peptides was 300 nL/min. Then, 8–35% solvent B (0.1% formic
acid in 95% acetonitrile) gradient was used for 103 min to separate
proteins. The data-dependent acquisition mode was used during mass
spectrometer running. Following are the parameters used for the mass
spectrometer analysis. For MS1 analysis, the AGC target
is 4 × 105, resolution 120 K, 350–1600 scan
range. For MS2 analysis resolution 50 K, the AGC target
is 1 × 105, ion filling time is 100 ms, the isolation
window is 1.6, and the collision energy HCD is 34. Dynamic exclusion
was set for 30 s with a 10 ppm mass window. The acquired mass spectrometry
data were searched against theHuman RefSeq protein database with
common contaminants using the SEQUEST search algorithm and using the
Proteome Discoverer platform (version 2.1, Thermo Scientific). The
search parameters were two missed cleavages, carbamidomethylation
at cysteine, and addition of 229.163 mass for the TMT label. The modifications
at theN-terminus of the peptide and lysine were set as fixed modifications.
The oxidation of methionine was considered as a variable modification.
The monoisotopic peptide mass tolerance was set to 10 ppm and the
MS/MS tolerance was set to 0.05 Da for the data analysis. The false
discovery rate at the PSM and protein levels was 1%. Statistical analysis
was performed using the Perseus software package. The mass spectrometry
data have been deposited in the PRIDE database with accession number
PXD023061.
Bioinformatic Analysis
The gene
ontology for proteomics and microarray was performed using FunRich
and PANTHER.[29,30] Gene IDs of the identified list
of genes and proteins were recovered and were applied using the online
databases to identify the pathways and for comparison analysis. Protein–protein
interactions were studied in the STRING online database at the highest
confidence level of 0.9. The network was clustered employing K-means clustering in the STRING database to identify prominent
interacting networks.
Results and Discussions
g-C3N4 Characterization
The SEM
images from g-C3N4 exhibited an irregular
shape and stacking (Figure A). The g-C3N4 surface morphology is
similar to that of our previously published material.[28] Further, the hydrodynamic size of the synthesized g-C3N4 material was found to be 100 nm size (Figure B). The phase characterization
of g-C3N4 was analyzed using XRD (Figure C). Peaks were observed at
2θ = 13.1 and 27.3° planes. The 13.1° peak represents
the packing motif of tris-s triazane, whereas 27.3°
corresponds to the reflection characteristics of interlayer stacking
of the conjugated aromatic system.[31] Peaks
were observed between 1200 and 1650 cm–1 by FTIR
spectroscopy. These were attributed to stretching of aromatic C–Nheterocycles present in g-C3N4 (Figure D). Additionally, 1226 and
1315 cm–1 peaks were also observed, which could
come from vibrations from secondary and tertiary amine fragments,
respectively.[32] The Raman spectra from
g-C3N4 did not exhibit any considerable peaks
by our earlier study due to fluorescence from the particles.[28,33] Thecarbon and nitrogen atomic percentages in the material were
45 and 55%, respectively.[34] Our earlier
thermogravimetric analysis performed on g-C3N4 revealed stability up to 600 °C,[28,34] indicating
these to be ideal for biological experiments. Therefore, in this study,
we analyzed the molecular changes associated with the uptake of g-C3N4.
Figure 1
Characterization of g-C3N4: (A)
scanning
electron microscopy analysis; (B) dynamic light scattering analysis;
(C) X-ray diffraction; and (D) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
Characterization of g-C3N4: (A)
scanning
electron microscopy analysis; (B) dynamic light scattering analysis;
(C) X-ray diffraction; and (D) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
Uptake of g-C3N4 by
Cells
After characterization of g-C3N4, we studied its uptake in two different cell lines MCF-7 and NCC-RbC-51
at two time points of 1 and 24 h for understanding the rapid and sustained
uptake. g-C3N4 uptake was minimal within 1 h
of exposure to the cells (Figure A), and the uptake increased after 24 h (Figure A). Our results agree with
earlier studies with g-C3N4–Au composites
where the uptake was performed for a duration of 24 h.[35] MCF-7 cells were used as an example for epithelial
cells in further studies. g-C3N4 was observed
to have both cytosol and nuclear localization, indicating possible
material molecular interactions inside the cellular organelles by
TEM measurements (Figure S2). The nuclear
localization of the material strongly indicates its role in regulating
the gene expression changes in the cells. As graphene and its derivatives
have been reported to cause a reduction in the mitochondrial membrane
potential,[36] we analyzed the effect of
g-C3N4 on mitochondria by studying the accumulation
of themitotracker red dye in MCF-7 cells, as the dye accumulation
is known to be affected by the mitochondrial potential. Figure B indicates that in g-C3N4-treated MCF-7 cells there is a lowered accumulation
of themitotracker red dye. Previous studies reported ROS-mediated
stress, mitochondrial functional loss,[37] and damage to macromolecules such as DNA in cells treated with graphene
and its derivatives.[38,39] Thus, to understand the signaling
pathways regulated by g-C3N4 in MCF-7 cells,
we performed DNA microarray analysis to identify the global transcriptomic
signature of g-C3N4 treatment in epithelial
cells.
Figure 2
g-C3N4 uptake and its effect: (A) uptake
of g-C3N4 in MCF-7 cells in 1 and 24 h; (B)
mitotracker staining of the control and g-C3N4 in MCF-7 cells.
g-C3N4 uptake and its effect: (A) uptake
of g-C3N4 in MCF-7 cells in 1 and 24 h; (B)
mitotracker staining of the control and g-C3N4 in MCF-7 cells.
Global
Gene Expression Analysis Identified
Extensive Changes after g-C3N4 Uptake in MCF-7
Cells
The global gene expression analysis was undertaken
using DNA microarrays at 50 μg/mL g-C3N4 treatment after 24 h as the cells showed the uptake only after 24
h, and at this concentration, the mitochondrial potential was altered.
Alterations in 1789 gene expressions with greater than 2-fold dysregulation
were found in the g-C3N4-treated cells compared
to the control MCF-7 cells (Table S1).
There were 252 genes that exhibited upregulation, whereas 1537 genes
exhibited downregulation (Figure A). Theheat map for the gene expression analysis and
hierarchical clustering was done using Genespring software analysis,
indicating that control samples (N = 3) clustered
together and g-C3N4-treated MCF-7 cells (N = 3) clustered as a group (Figure S3). The gene ontology performed using DAVID functional annotation
tools consisted of interstrand cross-link repair, response to ionizing
radiation, mRNA export, protein N-linked glycosylation via asparagine,
negative regulation of the KJK cascade, and apoptotic signaling pathway
mediated through P53 as affected biological processes (Table S2). Upregulated and downregulated genes
were segregated and were studied using PANTHER and FunRich 3.0 tools.
Both the upregulated and downregulated genes affected the nucleus
of the cells, whereas the nucleolus was significantly altered by upregulated
genes (Figure B).
Similar to g-C3N4, another graphene derivative
graphene oxide has been reported to cause nuclear perturbations and
altered its shape in skin keratinocytes.[40] Several (10.40%) downregulated genes after the g-C3N4 treatment affected the mitochondria. The loss of mitochondrial
staining is known to be due to both structural and functional loss
of mitochondria.[41] Similar to our results,
pristine graphene treatment in U87glioma cells caused dysfunctional
mitochondria.[42] Furthermore, analysis of
altered biological processes revealed cell adhesion and nucleotide
metabolism after g-C3N4 treatment (Figure C). Recently, three-dimensional
graphene foam has been reported to regulate the nucleotide metabolism
of neural stem cells.[43] The pathways identified
using PANTHER analysis revealed changes in the cellular signaling
and angiogenesis pathways. Furthermore, upregulated genes were involved
in GPCR, integrin, EGF receptor, and p38 MAP kinase signaling pathways
(Figure A), whereas
downregulated genes were involved in cadherin signaling, Wnt signaling,
PI3 kinase pathway, oxidative stress response, TGF-β signaling,
and p53 pathway (Figure B). The alteration of the MAPK pathway could result in dysregulated
cellular proliferation (Figure S4). On
further analysis, the key downregulated genes were dual-specificity
MAP kinase phosphatases 28 (DUSP28), STYXL1, MAP2K4, MYC, and STYX.
DUSP28 plays a key role in regulating dephosphorylation and inactivation
of MAP kinase isoforms while controlling oxidative phosphorylation
and mitochondrial dysfunction.[44] These
changes together can alter cell adhesion and cell proliferation. The
pathway analysis indicates cadherin and Wnt signaling that regulate
these processes to be downregulated.[45] Furthermore,
downregulation of the TGF-β signaling pathway was observed in
g-C3N4-treated MCF-7 cells consisting of SMAD
1, 2, 6 genes (Table S3). The transforming
growth factor β (TGF-β) expression increases in all fibrotic
diseases, and it also increases ROS production and suppresses antioxidant
enzymes.[46] However, recently, reciprocal
regulation of SMAD-dependent TGF-β signaling has also been reported.[46] We could envisage such a regulation by SMAD
genes in regulating TGF-β signaling in g-C3N4-treated cells. Further, KEGG pathway analysis has revealed
dysregulation of viral carcinogenesis, mRNA surveillance pathway,
cell cycle, transcriptional misregulation of cancer, RNA transport,
and ribosome biogenesis as interesting, dysregulated pathways, with
high fold enrichment and low FDR (Table S4), indicating that pathways related to transcription, transport of
mRNA, and translation of proteins could be effected, leading to ribosome
functional dysregulation after g-C3N4 uptake.
Figure 3
g-C3N4 uptake causes alteration in cell signaling
pathways. (A) Upregulated and downregulated genes by DNA microarray
analysis. (B) Functional enrichment analysis of the cellular component
by upregulated and downregulated genes. (C) Functional enrichment
analysis of biological processes by upregulated and downregulated
genes. “p” is used by the online tool to perform the
statistical analysis between the pathways. p-Values
<0.05, <0.01, and <0.001 are significantly altered pathways.
Figure 4
Pathway analysis using g-C3N4 in
MCF-7 cells.
(A, B) PANTHER pathway analysis of upregulated and downregulated genes,
respectively. (C, D) Immunoblotting of E cadherin and β catenin
from g-C3N4-treated and control MCF-7 cells.
(E) Phospho-CDC25C protein expression in g-C3N4-treated and control MCF-7 cells using fluorescence microscopy.
g-C3N4 uptake causes alteration in cell signaling
pathways. (A) Upregulated and downregulated genes by DNA microarray
analysis. (B) Functional enrichment analysis of the cellular component
by upregulated and downregulated genes. (C) Functional enrichment
analysis of biological processes by upregulated and downregulated
genes. “p” is used by the online tool to perform the
statistical analysis between the pathways. p-Values
<0.05, <0.01, and <0.001 are significantly altered pathways.Pathway analysis using g-C3N4 in
MCF-7 cells.
(A, B) PANTHER pathway analysis of upregulated and downregulated genes,
respectively. (C, D) Immunoblotting of E cadherin and β catenin
from g-C3N4-treated and control MCF-7 cells.
(E) Phospho-CDC25C protein expression in g-C3N4-treated and control MCF-7 cells using fluorescence microscopy.
Proteins Related to Wnt
Signaling and Cell
Cycle Are Dysregulated in Epithelial Cells
The alteration
in cell adhesion and proliferation enabled us to study the key molecules
associated with this pathway. Microarray data showed that the Wnt
signaling pathway is downregulated. Wnt signaling plays a vital role
in cell adhesion and transcriptional control. Additionally, cadherin
signaling was altered. Therefore, we validated β catenin and
E cadherin protein expressions after g-C3N4 treatment
as representative molecules for these signaling pathways. We observed
that after 24 h there was a reduction in their protein expressions
(Figure C,D). The
cell-cycle progression was altered in addition to dysregulation in
cell adhesion by transcriptomic analysis. Therefore, we analyzed theCDC25cser215 phosphorylation status in g-C3N4-treated cells to understand key phosphorylated proteins that regulate
cell-cycle progression. TheCDC25 class of proteins are phosphatases
that play a major role in mitosis progression, and their activities
are regulated by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation at specific
amino acid moities.[47] These proteins are
in the inactive form when they are hypophosphorylated and become active
when they are hyperphosphorylated.[48] The
g-C3N4 treatment resulted in upregulation of
phospho CDC25C (Figure E). This indicates a crosstalk between cell-cycle progression and
cell adhesion mediated by g-C3N4.
Growth of Fibroblast Cells on g-C3N4-Functionalized
PDMS Scaffolds
Treatment of
g-C3N4 in epithelial cells caused a decrease
in TGF-β signaling, an increase in oxidative stress response,
and altered the cellular adhesion. Pristine and oxidized graphene
are nontoxic to fibroblast cells and have been reported to support
the proliferation of skin fibroblasts and regeneration.[49] Our results indicated that g-C3N4 can cross the epithelium barrier; therefore, we functionalized
g-C3N4 on thepoly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS)
surface to grow fibroblasts. In the physiological condition, once
the epithelial barrier is broken, the material interacts with the
extracellular matrix of the fibroblasts. Therefore, g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS was used for growth of fibroblast
cells. PDMS has been widely used as a scaffold to culture fibroblasts,
melanocytes, and different other cell lines.[50] Previously, PDMS was made as a composite with GO sheets using a
hydrosilylation reaction and a hydrolysis condensation reaction.[51] These nanocomposites were also prepared using
simple curing and vacuum.[52] The latter
methodology was presently used to prepare the g-C3N4–PDMS composites. The functionalization of g-C3N4 in PDMS scaffolds was observed using SEM (Figure A). The functionalization
by nanoparticles made thePDMS surface rough, and the scaffold exhibited
fluorescence (Figure B). Further, tenon fibroblast (TF) cells, collected from patients
undergoing trabeculectomy, were seeded on g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS for 3 days. The TF cells attached and grew well
on these scaffolds. The cells could be visualized by SEM micrographs
(Figure C). Actin
staining was performed to show that the cells were attached on g-C3N4–PDMS composites (Figure D). However, due to the fluorescence property
of g-C3N4, the g-C3N4–PDMS
composites showed background fluorescence. ThePDMS polymer is known
to be hydrophobic, and for attaching cells on its surface, either
plasma treatment or extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen
or fibronectin coatings were needed.[53] However,
our results showed that on the g-C3N4-functionalized
PDMS matrix, the cell attachment was higher without the ECM coating
material. Similarly, the mitochondrial staining pattern differed from
tissue-culture-grown cells (Figure E). The mitochondrial staining indicates robust mitochondrial
function in both TCP and scaffold-grown cells. An altered morphology
of TF cells was observed in 1:10 PDMS-grown cells. However, g-C3N4 functionalization altered the matrix stiffness
of PDMS, enabling the recovered morphology of the TF. Therefore, g-C3N4 functionalization could be better for growing
fibroblast cells compared to PDMS alone. This scaffold was used for
further studies. The altered morphology of the cells cultured on g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS appeared to be more differentiated.[54] Therefore, to further analyze the global protein
expression changes, we performed proteomics using tandem mass tag
(TMT) labeling and mass spectrometry.
Figure 5
Efficient growth of fibroblast cells on
g-C3N4–PDMS composite scaffolds. (A)
SEM of g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS. (B) Fluorescence
microscopy of g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS. (C)
SEM of TF cells grown
on g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS. (D) Phalloidin
staining of cells grown on TCP and g-C3N4-functionalized
PDMS scaffolds. (E) Mitotracker staining of cells on TCP, PDMS, and
g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS scaffolds.
Efficient growth of fibroblast cells on
g-C3N4–PDMS composite scaffolds. (A)
SEM of g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS. (B) Fluorescence
microscopy of g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS. (C)
SEM of TF cells grown
on g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS. (D) Phalloidin
staining of cells grown on TCP and g-C3N4-functionalized
PDMS scaffolds. (E) Mitotracker staining of cells on TCP, PDMS, and
g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS scaffolds.
g-C3N4 in the Extracellular
Matrix Can Cause Proteomic Dysregulation in Fibroblasts
Changes
in cell attachment in response to varied matrix stiffnesses led us
to investigate global proteomic changes associated with fibroblast
cells grown on g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS using
fibroblast cells cultured on tissue culture plates as a control. Proteomic
analysis identified 1713 proteins in fibroblast cells grown on PDMS–g-C3N4 compared to control cells (Table S5). However, 676 proteins exhibited ≥1.5-fold
alterations in protein expression. The expressions of 382 proteins
were upregulated and 294 proteins were downregulated compared to the
protein expressions in the control fibroblast cells grown on tissue
culture plates. The protein expressions were represented in a Volcano
plot (Figure A). The
protein expressions varied significantly in g-C3N4–PDMS scaffold-grown fibroblasts compared to the control cells
grown on theTCP plate. The dysregulated genes were analyzed using
PANTHER bioinformatic analyses and the functional enrichment tool
(FunRich). In total, 676 proteins exhibiting ≥1.5-fold alterations
were segregated into upregulated (382) and downregulated (294) protein
expressions compared to the protein expression in the control TCP-plate-grown
cells. The gene ontology analysis identified that both upregulated
and downregulated proteins affected mitochondria, cytoplasm, and the
nuclear functions, similar to MCF-7 cells (Figure B). However, the proteins localized to the
plasma membrane were significantly downregulated in fibroblast cells.
The altered plasma membrane protein expression identified in the TF
could be due to the change in the matrix stiffness mediated by g-C3N4 present exterior to the cells. On further annotating
the biological process, both upregulated and downregulated proteins
altered the protein metabolism and energy pathways (Figure C).
Figure 6
Global proteomic changes
in fibroblast cells grown on g-C3N4–PDMS
scaffolds compared to control cells identified
widespread changes in cellular and biological processes. (A) Volcano
plot to show the differentially regulated proteins in TF grown on
g-C3N4–PDMS. Protein expressions are
as follows: yellow, downregulated; blue, no change; and red, upregulated.
(B) Cellular components of upregulated and downregulated proteins
in TF. (C) Biological processes of upregulated and downregulated proteins
in TF. “p” is used by the online tool to perform the
statistical analysis between the pathways. p-Values
<0.05, <0.01, and <0.001 are significantly altered pathways.
Global proteomic changes
in fibroblast cells grown on g-C3N4–PDMS
scaffolds compared to control cells identified
widespread changes in cellular and biological processes. (A) Volcano
plot to show the differentially regulated proteins in TF grown on
g-C3N4–PDMS. Protein expressions are
as follows: yellow, downregulated; blue, no change; and red, upregulated.
(B) Cellular components of upregulated and downregulated proteins
in TF. (C) Biological processes of upregulated and downregulated proteins
in TF. “p” is used by the online tool to perform the
statistical analysis between the pathways. p-Values
<0.05, <0.01, and <0.001 are significantly altered pathways.The KEGG pathway analysis with greater fold enrichment
and low
FDR identified dysregulation in the ribosome, protein processing in
the endoplasmic reticulum, spliceosome, carbon metabolism, endocytosis,
cytoskeletal rearrangement, and adherens junction pathways (Table S6). Further, upregulated and downregulated
proteins were segregated, and pathway analyses were performed using
the PANTHER online tool. Analysis showed altered integrin signaling,
gonadotropin-releasing pathway, ubiquitin proteasome pathway, Wnt
signaling, apoptosis, cell cycle, and TGF-β signaling (Figure A). Wnt signaling,
which was found downregulated in epithelial cells by the microarray,
was found to be upregulated in TF. Next, we analyzed the proteins
identified in this pathway. Our data showed β catenin, follistatin-related
protein 1, serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B, and calcineurin
subunit B to be dysregulated. This signaling plays an important role
in fibroblast differentiation to myofibroblasts. Tumor cells when
cocultured with fibroblasts are known to induce a myofibroblast phenotype
and altered TGF-β signaling in fibroblast cells.[55] Interestingly, MAPK3, identified in the TGF-β
signaling pathway (Tables S3 and S5), could
play a role in increased cellular proliferation. The downregulated
proteins showed an altered integrin pathway, cytoskeletal reorganization,
cadherin signaling, oxidative stress response, hypoxia, and metabolic
pathways such as glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathways (Figure B). On further analysis
of the proteins associated with oxidative stress, a thioredoxin-1
like protein (TXNL1) was identified. This protein is a reductase that
plays a vital role in the degradation of proteins, reduces oxidative
phosphatase, and can stimulate oxidative stress resistance.[56] Additionally, thioredoxin (TXN) antioxidant
proteins involved in redox metabolism are downregulated (Table S5). The principal proteins of oxidative
stress response TXNL1 and TXN were downregulated as elevated ROS may
not be present and need for antioxidants could be diminished.[57] Alternatively, antioxidant glutathione levels
could be elevated by increased glutathione synthetase and glutathione
reductase levels (Table S5). Elevated glutathione
could enable fibroblast cell growth. Its depletion in RPE cells was
found to increase ferroptosis, autophagy, and cell death.[58] HIF signaling is known to be a pivotal link
among energy metabolism, angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and viability.[59] Interestingly, downregulation of the HIF pathway
could account for the lowered glycolysis observed in fibroblast cells,
enabling sustained growth of cells. Stem cells cultured on reduced
O2 enabled downregulation of HIF-1a, leading to a metabolic
switch from glcolysis; moreover, decrease in ROS levels enabled reduced
DNA damage, resulting in long-term growth of the cells.[60] Earlier, thegraphene family nanomaterial GO
was proposed to be an efficient ROS scavenger enabling cardiac tissue
growth and repair.[61] Taken together, our
global proteomic analysis indicates that g-C3N4 in the scaffolds could efficiently scavenge ROS and enable fibroblast
cell growth. Interestingly, in both the epithelium and TF cells, when
g-C3N4 were treated or formed a scaffold for
cell growth, it induced downregulation of genes and proteins associated
with cadherin signaling, indicating alterations in ECM regulation.
Further, the altered morphology and the proteomics data were validated
using Vimentin staining as this protein expression was reported to
be a differentiation marker.[62] The TF cell
culture on g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS showed
a positive staining for Vimentin (Figure C). However, the pattern of staining is diffused,
indicating the possibility of differentiation of fibroblast cells.
Figure 7
Pathways
dysregulated in scaffold-grown fibroblasts compared to
the control. (A, B) PANTHER pathway analysis by upregulated and downregulated
proteins of g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS. (C)
Immunofluorescence validation of Vimentin identified by mass spectrometry.
Pathways
dysregulated in scaffold-grown fibroblasts compared to
the control. (A, B) PANTHER pathway analysis by upregulated and downregulated
proteins of g-C3N4-functionalized PDMS. (C)
Immunofluorescence validation of Vimentin identified by mass spectrometry.
Protein–Protein
Interaction Networks
Next, we analyzed protein–protein
interaction networks to
understand the key networks associated with g-C3N4 in fibroblasts using STRING database analysis. The upregulated protein
network contained 378 nodes and 678 edges (Figure S5). Using the K-mean clustering algorithm,
prominent 10 network clusters were identified. The prominent interaction
clusters comprised mRNA processing, RNA processing, elongation factors,
collagen, and MAPK3. Interestingly, β catenin and its interacting
partners comprising MAP2K2 and EGFR are also identified (Figure ). This interaction
could account for fibroblast proliferation on PDMS–g-C3N4 scaffolds. The downregulated protein network
had 292 nodes and 1472 edges. The clustering interactions included
protein interactions from splisosome, ribosomes, metabolism including
glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway, and vesicular trafficking
(Figure S6). Interestingly, oxidative stress
response genes such as SOD1, SOD2, GPX8, and PRDX family genes (PRDX1,
PRDX2, PRDX3, PRDX5) clustered together. The switch of metabolic interactions
into lowered ROS-responsive genes and lowered glycolysis is adaptive
mechanisms by fibroblast cells during efficient growth, proliferation,
and differentiation in fibroblasts into myofibroblasts. The regulatory
role of g-C3N4 in inducing the differentiation
of fibroblasts needs further investigation.
Figure 8
β Catenin protein–protein
interaction cluster is upregulated
in fibroblast cells grown on g-C3N4-functionalized
PDMS.
β Catenin protein–protein
interaction cluster is upregulated
in fibroblast cells grown on g-C3N4-functionalized
PDMS.
g-C3N4 Signature Pathways
A comparison of
pathways dysregulated using the Panther pathway
analysis tool between global transcriptomic and proteomic changes
associated with the g-C3N4 nanomaterial identified
47 pathways common between the two analyses (Figure S7, Table S7). The predominant alterations
were observed in several key pathways related to cellular proliferation,
apoptosis, and cell adhesion. These include Wnt signaling, integrin,
TGF-β, cadherin, oxidative stress response, and ubiquitin proteosome
pathway alterations in both epithelial and fibroblast cells (Table S7). The pathways are either upregulated
or downregulated based upon the presence of nanomaterials inside or
outside the cell in the scaffolds.
Conclusions
Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) is a silicone elastomer and has been
used as a substrate for various cell culture studies. The elastic
modulus of PDMS is known to induce changes in the tenon fibroblasts.
PDMS as a control would have been excellent, but one major difficulty
was that cells were not attached to PDMS due to its hydrophobic nature
and coating with ECM proteins would have induced gene expression changes,
as reported earlier. Primary human tenon fibroblasts (TFs) have been
reported to respond differentially to different extracellular matrix
protein gels, which in turn causes their differentiation. Interestingly,
g-C3N4–PDMS did not require functionalization
with extracellular matrix proteins, and cells showed good adhesion
as shown by Phallodin staining.Our results indicate that the
synthesized pure g-C3N4 can cross the barrier
formed by the epithelial cells. Its
treatment in epithelial cells induced elevated ROS, alterations in
cellular adhesion, proliferation, and loss of barrier function in
the epithelial cells. Beneath the epithelium is the fibroblast, which
is known to synthesize the components of the extracellular matrix.
The changes in the elasticity and composition of the extracellular
matrix are known to initiate fibrosis. Therefore, g-C3N4 is used in the matrix scaffolds to identify its role in initiating
molecular proteomic dysregulation.The nanoparticles’
presence in the ECM can cause changes
in the molecular programming of fibroblast layers beneath the epithelial
cells. We deciphered the specific pathways altered by g-C3N4 using two different cell lines, epithelial (MCF-7)
and fibroblast (TF) cells. We used two different ways of treatment
of the same concentration of g-C3N4. Directly
treating MCF-7 and functionalizing g-C3N4 on
PDMS to use it as a matrix. We observed common signaling pathways
such as Wnt signaling, integrin signaling, TGF-β signaling,
cadherin signaling, oxidative stress response, ubiquitin proteasome
pathway, and EGF receptor signaling pathways to be affected in both
cell lines. Our results should enable the wider application of g-C3N4 after our molecular pathway analysis.
Authors: M P Lewis; K A Lygoe; M L Nystrom; W P Anderson; P M Speight; J F Marshall; G J Thomas Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-02-23 Impact factor: 7.640