| Literature DB >> 33869883 |
Zehara Nuru1, Paulos Getachew1.
Abstract
High temperature continuous deep fat frying of foods will result in the frying oil and food quality deterioration. Although the quality can be retained by using fresh oil, this approach will increase the production cost. In this study, quality improvement of used niger seed oil using adsorbent treatment was evaluated. Each adsorbent was mixed with 20 h used niger seed oil (15% w/v) at 150 °C and stirred for 30 min. The oil was recovered through centrifugation at 4200 rpm for 15 min. The tested chemical parameters of the oil increased after 20 h of frying (acid value (AV) (2.24-8.31) mg KOH/gm oil, free fatty acid (FFA) (1.13-4.17) %, and peroxide value (PV) (1.00-13.97 mEq oxygen/Kg of oil). The improvement in free fatty acid, peroxide value and oil recovery upon treatment of the fried oil with ash, bentonite, bleaching earth, silca gel and magnesium oxide (MgO) was (61, 57, 80), (66, 43, 88), (56, 21, 85), (61, 50, 70), and (73, 64, 40) % respectively. Ash and MgO effectively improved the physico-chemical characteristics of the used oil. Thus, the two were selected for further optimization of effective concentration and to evaluate their synergetic effect. Treatments with 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5 and 15.0 % of ash reduced the AV of the fried oil by 26, 39, 46, 53, 53 and 60 % respectively (p < 0.05). Also the combination of ash and MgO (1:1) improved the physico-chemical properties of the frying oil to nearly fresh quality.Entities:
Keywords: Adsorbents; Ash; Magnesium oxide; Niger seed oil; Used frying oil
Year: 2021 PMID: 33869883 PMCID: PMC8045038 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Pictorial representation of the study design and flow.
Mass of test portion of oil based on the expected acid value.
| Expected acid value (mg KOH/g oil) | Mass of test portion (g) |
|---|---|
| <1 | 20 |
| 1 to 4 | 10 |
| 4 to 15 | 2.5 |
| 15 to 75 | 0.5 |
| >75 | 0.1 |
Source: Ethiopian Standard (ES ISO 660: 2009).
Effect of different adsorbents on physical quality improvement of fried niger seed oil.
| Absorbent treatment | S.G | S.G Improvement (%) | VISCO | VISCO Improvement (%) | RI | RI Improvement (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh niger seed oil | 0.9229 ± 0.00c | ND | 54.50 ± 0.64d | ND | 1.47518 ± 0.00f | ND |
| Fried niger seed oil | 1.0016 ± 0.01a | ND | 58.97 ± 0.20a | ND | 1.47716 ± 0.00a | ND |
| Ash | 0.9502 ± 0.00b,c | 5 | 57.13 ± 0.17b | 3 | 1.47704 ± 0.00d | NI |
| Bentonite | 0.9820 ± 0.00a,b | 2 | 56.32 ± 0.02b,c | 4. | 1.47702 ± 0.00c | NI |
| Bleaching earth | 0.9728 ± 0.01a,b | 3 | 56.46 ± 0.07b,c | 4 | 1.47711 ± 0.00b | NI |
| Silica gel | 0.9445 ± 0.02b,c | 6 | 56.08 ± 0.03c | 5 | 1.47692 ± 0.00c | NI |
| MgO | 0.9427 ± 0.00b,c | 6 | 55.65 ± 0.08c | 6 | 1.47638 ± 0.00e | NI |
| Centrifugation | 1.0016 ± 0.01a | NI | 58.71 ± 0.43a | NI | 1.47715 ± 0.00a | NI |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Means in the same column not sharing the same superscripts are significantly different based on Duncan's multiple range test at (p < 0.05). S.G (Specific Gravity), VISCO (Viscosity), RI (Refractive Index), “NI”-No Improvement; “ND”-Not Determined.
Effect of different adsorbents on chemical quality improvement and recovery of fried niger seed oil.
| Adsorbent treatment | AV (mgKOH/g) | AV Improvement (%) | FFA (%) | FFA Improvement (%) | PV (mEq O2/Kg) | PV Improvement (%) | IV (mg I2/g) | IV Improvement (%) | Oil recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh niger seed oil | 2.24 ± 0.00b | ND | 1.13 ± 0.00b | ND | 1.00 ± 0.57f | ND | 129.93 ± 0.56a,b | ND | ND |
| Fried niger seed oil | 8.31 ± 1.55a | ND | 4.17 ± 0.78a | ND | 13.97 ± 0.00a | ND | 126.76 ± 0.70b | ND | ND |
| Ash | 3.36 ± 0.00b | 40 | 1.62 ± 0.00b | 61 | 5.99 ± 0.66d,e | 57 | 129.22 ± 0.40a,b | NI | 80 |
| Bentonite | 2.80 ± 0.32b | 66 | 1.40 ± 0.16b | 66 | 7.98 ± 0.00c | 43 | 130.49 ± 0.03a | NI | 88 |
| Bleaching earth | 3.68 ± 0.18b | 56 | 1.85 ± 0.09b | 56 | 10.99 ± 0.66b | 21 | 129.20 ± 0.70a,b | NI | 85 |
| Silica gel | 3.36 ± 0.00b | 40 | 1.62 ± 0.00b | 61 | 6.99 ± 0.57c,d | 50 | 128.50 ± 0.30a,b | NI | 70 |
| MgO | 2.24 ± 0.00b | 73 | 1.13 ± 0.00b | 73 | 5.00 ± 0.57e | 64 | 128.95 ± 0.00a,b | NI | 40 |
| Centrifugation | 8.31 ± 1.55a | NI | 4.17 ± 0.78a | NI | 13.96 ± 1.15a | NI | 127.98 ± 2.82a,b | NI | ND |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Means in the same column not sharing the same superscripts are significantly different based on Duncan's multiple range test at (p < 0.05). FFA (Free Fatty Acid), AV (Acid Value), PV (Peroxide Value), IV (Iodine Value), “NI”-No Improvement, “ND”-Not Determined.
Effective concentration of ash in improving physical quality of fried niger seed oil.
| S.G | S.G Improvement (%) | VISCO | VISCO Improvement (%) | RI | RI Improvement (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh niger seed oil | 0.9229 ± 0.02g | ND | 54.50 ± 0.64i | ND | 1.475180 ± 0.00j | ND |
| Fried niger seed oil | 1.0016 ± 0.01a | ND | 58.97 ± 0.20a | ND | 1.477160 ± 0.00a | ND |
| 2.5 % | 0.9997 ± 0.00a | NI | 58.86 ± 0.07a,b | NI | 1.477170 ± 0.00a | NI |
| 5.0 % | 0.9997 ± 0.00a | NI | 58.63 ± 0.03a,b | NI | 1.477140 ± 0.00a,b | NI |
| 7.5 % | 0.9837 ± 0.00a,b,c | 2 | 58.50 ± 0.08a,b | NI | 1.477101 ± 0.00b,c | NI |
| 10.0 % | 0.9740 ± 0.11c,d,e | 3 | 58.30 ± 0.28b,c | 1 | 1.477120 ± 0.00b,c | NI |
| 12.5 % | 0.9605 ± 0.00d,e,f | 4 | 57.76 ± 0.11c,d | 2. | 1.477090 ± 0.00c | NI |
| 15.0 % | 0.9502 ± 0.00e,f | 5 | 57.13 ± 0.17e,f | 3 | 1.477040 ± 0.00e | NI |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Means in the same column not sharing the same superscripts are significantly different based on Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05). S.G (Specific Gravity), VISCO (Viscosity), RI (Refractive Index),“NI”-No Improvement, “ND”-Not Determined.
Effective concentration of ash in improving chemical quality of fried niger seed oil.
| Adsorbent treatment | AV (mgKOH/g) | AV Improvement (%) | FFA (%) | FFA Improvement (%) | PV (mEqO2/Kg) | PV Improvement (%) | IV (mg I2/g) | IV Improvement (%) | Oil recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh niger seed oil | 2.24 ± 0.00e | ND | 1.16 ± 0.00e | ND | 1.00 ± 0.57i | ND | 129.93 ± 0.56a,b | ND | ND |
| Fried niger seed oil | 8.31 ± 1.55a | ND | 4.17 ± 0.78a | ND | 13.97 ± 0.00a | ND | 126.76 ± 0.70b | ND | ND |
| 2.5 % | 6.17 ± 0.32b | 26 | 3.10 ± 0.33b | 26 | 12.00 ± 0.23b | 14 | 133.62 ± 4.38a,b | NI | 90 |
| 5.0 % | 5.04 ± 0.31b,c | 39 | 2.53 ± 0.15b,c | 39 | 10.19 ± 0.35c,d | 27 | 132.13 ± 4.93a,b | NI | 85 |
| 7.5 % | 4.49 ± 0.00c,d | 46 | 2.26 ± 0.00b,c,d | 46 | 9.79 ± 0.10c,d | 30 | 133.48 ± 0.07a,b | NI | 85 |
| 10.0 % | 3.92 ± 0.32c,d | 53 | 1.97 ± 0.30c,d,e | 53 | 8.39 ± 0.23e | 40 | 132.16 ± 2.09a,b | NI | 83 |
| 12.5 % | 3.92 ± 0.31c,d | 53 | 1.97 ± 0.16c,d,e | 53 | 7.58 ± 0.23e,f | 46 | 135.40 ± 2.20a,b | NI | 81 |
| 15.0 % | 3.36 ± 0.00d,e | 59 | 1.62 ± 0.00d,e | 61 | 5.99 ± 0.66g | 57 | 129.22 ± 0.40a,b | NI | 80 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Means in the same column not sharing the same superscripts are significantly different based on Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05). FFA (Free Fatty Acid), AV (Acid Value), PV (Peroxide Value), IV (Iodine Value), “NI”-No Improvement; “ND”-Not Determined.
Effective concentration of magnesium oxide in improving physical quality of fried niger seed oil.
| S.G | S.G Improvement (%) | VISCO | VISCO Improvement (%) | RI | RI Improvement (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh niger seed oil | 0.9229 ± 0.02g | ND | 54.50 ± 0.64i | ND | 1.47518 ± 0.00j | ND |
| Fried niger seed oil | 1.0016 ± 0.01a | ND | 58.97 ± 0.20a | ND | 1.477160 ± 0.00a | ND |
| 2.5 % | 0.9977 ± 0.00a,b | NI | 58.73 ± 0.10a,b | NI | 1.477115 ± 0.00b,c | NI |
| 5.0 % | 0.9964 ± 0.00a,b,c | NI | 58.62 ± 0.05a,b | NI | 1.476945 ± 0.00d | NI |
| 7.5 % | 0.9853 ± 0.00a,b,c | 1 | 57.59 ± 0.14d,e | 2 | 1.476860 ± 0.00f | NI |
| 10.0 % | 0.9756 ± 0.00b,c,d | 3 | 56.89 ± 0.03f,g | 3 | 1.476750 ± 0.00g | NI |
| 12.5 % | 0.95302 ± 0.01e,f | 5 | 56.37 ± 0.08f,g | 4 | 1.476525 ± 0.00h | NI |
| 15.0 % | 0.9427 ± 0.00f,g | 6 | 55.65 ± 0.08h | 6 | 1.47638 ± 0.00i | NI |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Means in the same column not sharing the same superscripts are significantly different based on Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05). S.G (Specific gravity), VISCO (Viscosity), RI (Refractive Index), “NI”-No Improvement, “ND”-Not Determined.
Effective concentration of magnesium oxide in improving chemical quality of fried niger seed oil.
| Adsorbent treatment | AV (mgKOH/g) | AV Improvement (%) | FFA (%) | FFA Improvement (%) | PV (mEqO2/g) | PV Improvement (%) | IV (mg I2/g) | IV Improvement (%) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh niger seed oil | 2.24 ± 0.00e | ND | 1.16 ± 0.00e | ND | 1.00 ± 0-.57i | ND | 129.93 ± 0.56a,b | ND | ND |
| Fried niger seed oil | 8.31 ± 1.55a | ND | 4.17 ± 0.78a | ND | 13.97 ± 0.00a | ND | 126.76 ± 0.70b | ND | ND |
| 2.5% | 5.05 ± 0.32b,c | 39 | 2.54 ± 0.09b,c,d | 39 | 11.56 ± 0.22b | 17 | 127.18 ± 2.15b | NI | 73 |
| 5.0 % | 4.48 ± 0.00c,d | 46 | 2.25 ± 0.21c,d | 46 | 10.6 ± 0.11c | 24 | 137.01 ± 2.11a | NI | 68 |
| 7.5 % | 3.37 ± 0.00d,e | 59 | 1.69 ± 0.00c,d,e | 59 | 10.00 ± 0.11d | 28 | 137.16 ± 4.39a | NI | 64 |
| 10.0 % | 3.36 ± 0.00d,e | 60 | 1.69 ± 0.00c,d,e | 60 | 8.38 ± 0.23e | 40 | 129.67 ± 2.39a,b | NI | 58 |
| 12.5 % | 3.36 ± 0.00d,e | 60 | 1.69 ± 0.00c,d,e | 60 | 7.39 ± 0.11f | 47 | 134.11 ± 3.22a,b | NI | 48 |
| 15.0 % | 2.24 ± 0.00e | 73 | 1.13 ± 0.00d,e | 61 | 5.00 ± 0.57h | 64 | 128.95 ± 0.00a,b | NI | 40 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05). FFA (Free Fatty Acid), AV (Acid Value), PV (Peroxide Value), IV (Iodine Value),“NI”-No Improvement; “ND”-Not Determined.
Synergetic effect of ash and magnesium oxide in improving physical quality of fried niger seed oil.
| Adsorbent treatment | S.G | S. G. Improvement (%) | VISCO | VISCO Improvement (%) | RI | RI Improvement (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh niger seed oil | 0.9229 ± 0.02c | ND | 54.50 ± 0.64c | ND | 1.47518 ± 0.00e | ND |
| Fried niger seed oil | 1.0016 ± 0.01a | ND | 58.97 ± 0.20a | ND | 1.47716 ± 0.00a | ND |
| Ash | 0.9502 ± 0.00b | 5 | 57.13 ± 0.17b | 3 | 1.47704 ± 0.00b | NI |
| MgO | 0.9427 ± 0.00b,c | 6 | 55.65 ± 0.08b,c | 6 | 1.47638 ± 0.00d | NI |
| Blend (Ash: MgO) (1:1) | 0.9619 ± 0.01b | 4 | 58.28 ± 0.15b | 1 | 1.47669 ± 0.00c | NI |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05). S.G (Specific gravity), VISCO (Viscosity), RI (Refractive Index), “NI”-No Improvement, “ND”- Not Determined.
Synergetic effect of ash and magnesium oxide in improving chemical quality of fried niger seed oil.
| Adsorbent treatment | AV (mgKOH/g) | AV Improvement (%) | FFA (%) | FFA Improvement (%) | PV (mEq O2/Kg) | PV Improvement (%) | IV (mg I2/g) | IV Improvement (%) | Oil recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh niger seed oil | 2.24 ± 0.00b | ND | 1.13 ± 0.00b | ND | 1.00 ± 0.57d | ND | 129.93 ± 0.56a | ND | ND |
| Fried niger seed oil | 8.31 ± 1.55a | ND | 4.17 ± 0.78a | ND | 13.97 ± 0.00a | ND | 126.76 ± 0.70a | ND | ND |
| Ash | 3.36 ± 0.00b | 40 | 1.62 ± 0.00b | 61 | 5.99 ± 0.66c | 57 | 129.22 ± 0.40a | NI | 80 |
| MgO | 2.24 ± 0.00b | 73 | 1.13 ± 0.00b | 73 | 5.00 ± 0.57c | 64 | 128.95 ± 0.00a | NI | 40 |
| Blend (Ash: MgO) (1:1) | 3.35 ± 0.00b | 60 | 1.68 ± 0.00b | 60 | 7.19 ± 0.22b | 49 | 130.13 ± 4.06a | NI | 75 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05). FFA (Free Fatty Acid), AV (Acid Value), PV (Peroxide Value), IV (Iodine Value), “NI”-No Improvement, “ND”- Not Determined.