| Literature DB >> 33869876 |
Muhammad Sulaiman Zubair1, Siti Qamariyah Khairunisa2, Agustinus Widodo1, Ramadanil Pitopang3.
Abstract
Alpinia eremochlamys K. Schum, Etlingera flexuosa A.D. Poulsen, and Etlingera acanthoides A.D. Poulsen are endemic Zingiberaceae plants from Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. This study is the first report on screening the potential antiviral activity of ethanol extracts of the leaves, pseudostems, and rhizomes parts on HIV-infected MT-4 cells and identifying chemical constituents by GC-MS. The plants were extracted by the maceration method using 96% ethanol as a solvent. The antiviral activity was measured using Viral-ToxGlo colorimetric method and using the extracts at concentrations ranging from 7.8 to 1000 μg/mL. GC-MS was used to identify the secondary metabolites of potential extracts. The results showed that ethanol extract of E. acanthoides rhizome was the most potent antiviral activity (IC50 of 1.74 ± 2.46 μg/mL) and less toxic on lymphocyte (MT-4) cells (CC50 of 204.90 ± 106.35 μg/mL), affording the highest value of selectivity index (SI) of 117.76. A. eremochlamys rhizomes also showed promising antiviral activity with IC50 of 64.18 ± 2.58 μg/mL and no toxicity on MT-4 cells affording a high SI value 19.05. Preliminary GC-MS identification showed the presence of terpenoids and fatty acids as major compounds. Zerumbone, ar-turmerone, caryophyllene, and caryophyllene oxide were also detected. Chemical constituents identified by GC-MS might be responsible for the antiviral activity of extracts, suggesting further isolation and antiviral testing of the purified compounds.Entities:
Keywords: Endemic; GC-MS; HIV-1; MT-4; Zingiberaceae
Year: 2021 PMID: 33869876 PMCID: PMC8045043 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1A. eremochlamys with its flower and fruit (A), E. flexuosa with its flower (B), E. acanthoides with its rhizome (C).
IC50, CC50, and selectivity index (SI) of Alpinia eremochlamys, E. flexuosa and E. acanthoides ethanol extracts.
| Sample | IC50 (μg/mL) | CC50 (μg/mL) | SI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | 21.41 ± 24.26 | 9.87 ± 2.66 | 0.46a |
| Pseudostem | 67.96 ± 10.82 | 25.42 ± 6.53 | 0.37a |
| Rhizome | 64.18 ± 2.58 | 1223.05 ± 1469.29 | 19.05a |
| Leaf | 15.74 ± 2.95 | 2.45 ± 3.19 | 0.16a |
| Pseudostem | 106.75 ± 5.30 | 13.53 ± 0.28 | 0.13a |
| Rhizome | 20.31 ± 28.71 | 10.28 ± 3.28 | 0.51a |
| Leaf | 17.89 ± 12.33 | 18.64 ± 2.99 | 1.04a |
| Pseudostem | 29.08 ± 2.54 | 351.90 ± 131.80 | 12.10a |
| Rhizome | 1.74 ± 2.46 | 204.90 ± 106.35 | 117.76a |
| PC | 157.11 ± 174.63 | 1.28 × 1020 ± 1.81 × 1020 | 8.14 × 1017b |
| NC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PC: Positive control (Duviral contained zidovudin and lamivudin); NC: Negative control (1% DMSO); n = 2.
Values = Mean ± SEM. Values with similar superscript letter are not significantly different with each other.
(p < 0.05), analyzed by ANOVA-Tukey's post-hoc multiple comparisons)
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (GC-MS) data of phytocompounds putatively identified in ethanol extract of A. eremochlamys and E. acanthoides rhizomes.
| No | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compounds | Peak area (%) | Similarity Index (%) | Compounds | Peak area (%) | Similarity Index (%) | |
| 1 | 1-cyclopentylacetone | 0.60 | 77 | Undecane | 0.94 | 95 |
| 2 | 3,7-dimethylocta-1,6-dien-3-ol | 9.46 | 95 | Ar-Tumerone | 1.01 | 90 |
| 3 | 1-isopropyl-1-methyl-2-oxohydrazine | 0.37 | 78 | 2,6,10,14-Tetramethylpentadecane | 0.38 | 85 |
| 4 | 1-isopropyl-4-methyl-3-cyclohexen-1-ol | 0.29 | 95 | Zerumbone | 1.70 | 92 |
| 5 | (1)-1,5-dimethyl-1-vinylhex-4-enyl acetate | 5.51 | 96 | Palmitic Acid, Methyl Ester | 2.24 | 94 |
| 6 | Caryophyllene | 0.61 | 97 | Methyl (9e)-9-Octadecenoate | 0.94 | 92 |
| 7 | 2,6,6,9-tetramethyl-1,4,8-cycloundecatriene | 0,31 | 96 | 1,2-Hexadecanediol | 0.84 | 59 |
| 8 | caryophyllene oxide | 0.64 | 91 | 2-Pentyl 6-(4-Pentylphenyl) 2,6-Naphthalenedicarboxylate | 1.54 | 55 |
| 9 | 2,5,9-trimethyl-4,8-cycloundecadien-1-one | 0.19 | 84 | 2-Pentyl 6-(4-Pentylphenyl) 2,6-Naphthalenedicarboxylate | 4.93 | 68 |
| 10 | ethyl iso-allocholate | 0.70 | 75 | 2-Pentyl 6-(4-Pentylphenyl) 2,6-Naphthalenedicarboxylate | 3.32 | 59 |
| 11 | 1-hydroxytetradecane | 0.17 | 94 | 2-Pentyl 6-(4-Pentylphenyl) 2,6-Naphthalenedicarboxylate | 6.81 | 65 |
| 12 | isochiapin b | 0.42 | 79 | 2-Pentyl 6-(4-Pentylphenyl) 2,6-Naphthalenedicarboxylate | 14.72 | 64 |
| 13 | methyl myristate | 0,20 | 93 | 2-Pentyl 6-(4-Pentylphenyl) 2,6-Naphthalenedicarboxylate | 38.17 | 66 |
| 14 | (7a-isopropenyl-4,5-dimethyl-octahydro-inden-4-yl)-methanol | 0,50 | 79 | 2-Pentyl 6-(4-Pentylphenyl) 2,6-Naphthalenedicarboxylate | 22.25 | 68 |
| 15 | 4-methyl-6-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-4-hexen-1-ol | 0,35 | 82 | 4-Tert-Butylphenoxy-.alpha.-Propionic Acid | 0.22 | 60 |
| 16 | 5-isopropenyl-2,7-dimethyl-1,8-nonadiene | 0.16 | 76 | |||
| 17 | 14b-pregnane | 0.26 | 79 | |||
| 18 | (7a-isopropenyl-4,5-dimethyloctahydroinden-4-yl)methanol | 0.27 | 82 | |||
| 19 | palmitic acid methyl ester | 5.96 | 95 | |||
| 20 | Methenolone | 0.39 | 78 | |||
| 21 | pentadecanoic acid | 1.53 | 88 | |||
| 22 | (4e)-4-methyl-6-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-4-hexen-1-ol | 1.24 | 82 | |||
| 23 | palmitic acid ethyl ester | 0.54 | 90 | |||
| 24 | 1,5,9-trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)- 4,8,13-cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol | 2.12 | 77 | |||
| 25 | isopropyl palmitate | 0.53 | 76 | |||
| 26 | (6e,10e,14e,18e)-2,6,10,15,19,23-hexamethyl-1,6,10,14,18,22-tetracosahexaen-3-ol | 0.85 | 91 | |||
| 27 | (4e)-4-methyl-6-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-4-hexen-1-ol | 0.20 | 81 | |||
| 28 | alloaromadendrenoxid-(1) | 0.32 | 79 | |||
| 29 | methyl (9z,12z)-9,12-octadecadienoate | 2.34 | 94 | |||
| 30 | 9-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | 6.94 | 90 | |||
| 31 | octadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 1.29 | 94 | |||
| 32 | isoretinene a | 1.11 | 71 | |||
| 33 | (7a-isopropenyl-4,5-dimethyl-octahydro-inden-4-yl)-methanol | 1.07 | 82 | |||
| 34 | andrographolide | 0.99 | 76 | |||
| 35 | selina-3,7(11)-dien | 2.92 | 71 | |||
| 36 | dodecahydro-3,8,8,11a-tetramethyl-5h-3,5a-epoxynaphth[2,1-c]oxepin | 0.56 | 76 | |||
| 37 | longifolenaldehyd | 0.90 | 79 | |||
| 38 | (albicanol) decahydro-2-methylene-5,5,8a-trimethyl-1-naphthalenemethanol | 0.37 | 77 | |||
| 39 | (albicanol) decahydro-2-methylene-5,5,8a-trimethyl-1-naphthalenemethanol | 0.30 | 75 | |||
| 40 | alloaromadendrenoxid-(1) | 19.7 | 79 | |||
| 41 | Strophanthidol | 0.26 | 76 | |||
| 42 | (albicanol) decahydro-2-methylene-5,5,8a-trimethyl-1-naphthalenemethanol | 0.93 | 74 | |||
| 43 | 19,19-dimethoxy-3-oxoandrost-1-en-17-yl acetate | 3.09 | 78 | |||
| 44 | 2,4a,8,8-tetramethyl-decahydro-4cyclopropa[d]naphthalene | 0.59 | 75 | |||
| 45 | phthalic acid, mono-(2-ethylhexyl) ester | 4.46 | 95 | |||
| 46 | (4e)-4-methyl-6-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-4-hexen-1-ol | 2.36 | 73 | |||
| 47 | (4ar,9as,9bs)-4a,6,6,9a-tetramethyl-trans-perhydroindano[2,1-c]pyran | 2.75 | 74 | |||
| 48 | 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-2-butanone | 2.37 | 67 | |||
| 49 | 4,4-dimethylandrost-5-en-3-one | 1.65 | 67 | |||
| 50 | 5α,17α,20α-cholestane-3β,6α-diol | 0.42 | 58 | |||
| 51 | 2,6,10,15,19,23-hexamethyl-2,6,10,14,18,22-tetracosahexaene | 1.73 | 74 | |||
| 52 | 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl-17-(1,4,4-trimethyl-cyclohex-2-enyl)-heptadeca-2,6,10,14-tetraene | 1.01 | 71 | |||
| 53 | 1-heptatriacontanol | 1.08 | 67 | |||
| 54 | pregn-20-yn-17-ol | 0.61 | 74 | |||
| 55 | pregn-20-yn-17-ol | 0.50 | 75 | |||
| Total Indentification (%) | 95.63 | 100.01 | ||||
Figure 2GC-MS chromatogram of the ethanol extract of E. acanthoides rhizome.
Figure 3Secondary metabolites identified on E. acanthoides rhizome ethanol extract by GC-MS.
Figure 4GC-MS chromatogram of the ethanol extract of A. eremochlamis rhizome.
Figure 5Secondary metabolites identified on A. eremochlamys rhizome ethanol extract by GC-MS.