| Literature DB >> 33869818 |
Vasimalla Yesudasu1, Himansu Shekhar Pradhan1, Rahul Jasvanthbhai Pandya2.
Abstract
In the recent years, researchers have contributed substantially in the field of Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) sensors and its applications. SPR sensors show the salient features, such as label-free detection, real-time monitoring, small sample size, furnish accurate outcomes at low cost, and smooth handling. Moreover, the SPR sensors are also well-known because of its quantitative and qualitative excellent performance in real-time applications, including drug discovery, environment monitoring, food safety, medical diagnosis, clinical diagnosis, biological studies, and biomolecule interactions. This paper exhibits a comprehensive review of SPR based sensors, such as prism-based SPR with the applications (e.g., biomolecule interaction, medical diagnostic, etc.), fiber-based SPR, and waveguide-based SPR. Furthermore, we summarized the modern designs and techniques with their limitations and challenges in detail. The erudition outlined in this paper can be given an exceptional benefit for the researchers and industry people in the field of SPR based sensors.Entities:
Keywords: Detection accuracy; Fiber based-surface plasmon resonance; Figure of merit; Quality factor; Sensitivity; Surface plasmon resonance
Year: 2021 PMID: 33869818 PMCID: PMC8035490 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1(a) Phenomenon of metals (b) Reminiscent of Lenz's law.
Figure 2Exponential intensity field for surface plasmon (SP) in metal and dielectric (M-D) layers (X-axis signifies the metal-dielectric interface and Z-axis illustrates the field intensity).
Figure 3Distribution curves for surface plasmon wave (), and the direct light incident through the dielectric medium().
Figure 4Design of excitation of evanescent wave (EW) on the metal-dielectric (M-D) interface.
Figure 5SPR configurations: (a) Otto configuration (b) Kretschmann configuration.
Figure 6Dispersal curves for EW-, , at the metal-dielectric (M-D), and the metal-prism (M-P) interface.
Figure 7SPR response in terms of reflectance by applying angular interrogation and sharp dip of the curve is a resonance angle ().
Figure 8The resonance shift () with respect to the RI change (. (Blue curve represents the SPR curve at sensing RI (), and red curverepresents SPR curve after sensing RI change ()).
Figure 9(a) Canonical structure of the Prism-based SPR sensor employing Kretchsmann configuration (b) Resonance/wavelength Shift in reflectance curve according to the RI changes in a medium [10, Figure 1].
Summary of the state of the art in Performance Enhancement of the SPR Sensor at 633 nm Wavelength.
| References | Configuration | Performance Parameters | Conclusion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S (°/RIU) | D.A. | Q.F. (RIU−1) | |||
| Y. K. Prajapathi et al. 2013 [ | Prism + Ag + Metamaterial + Ag + Au + Water | - | - | - | The SPR sensor has the advantage of improving reflectance dip and S by employing the metamaterial layer. |
| J. B.Muryaet al.2015 [ | Prism + Au + MoS2 + Affinity + Water | 48.82 | 0.615 | 5.12 | The SPR sensor proposed the effect of Si between metal and MoS2. |
| Prism + Au + Si + MoS2 + Affinity + Water | 48.65 | 10243 | 85365 | ||
| J. B.Murya et al.2016 [ | Prism + Si + Graphene + Affinity + Sensing Layer | 49.86 | 14.54 | 207.75 | The sensor Ag + Graphene/MoS2) presents the acceptable S, but the D.A. and Q.F. are substantially higher than the existing work. |
| Prism + Si + MoS2+ Affinity + Sensing Layer | 49.29 | 17.25 | 246.45 | ||
| J. B.Murya et al.2017 [ | Prism + Metal + Dielectric + Water | - | - | - | The purely real part RI of the dielectric layer offers the contradicted results between |
| J. B.Muryaet al.2016 [ | Prism BK7/SF11/2S2G)+ Metal Au/Ag/Cu/Al)+ MoS2+Graphene + Water | - | - | - | Ag furnishes the lower FWHM, which leads to high D.A. and Q.F.; Cu renders high |
| J. B.Muryaet al. 2018 [ | Prism + AuNPs + MoS2+ Affinity + Water | 107.29 | 0.50 | 7.16 | The monolayer and bilayer MoS2 furnish the highest S than the graphene-based sensor. |
| M. S.Rahmanet al.2017 [ | Prism + Au + MoS2+ PBS solution | 89.29 | 0.919 | 13.13 | The hybrid structure of MoS2-Grpahene is appropriated to enhance the S of the SPR sensor. |
| S. Palet al.2017 [ | Prism + Au + BP + Affinity + Sensing Layer | 180 | 0.29 | - | The BP and BP-Si based structures render the highest S and D.A., respectively. These are almost constant with a variation of sensing RI. |
| Prism + Au + Si + BP + Affinity + Sensing Layer | 115 | 1.19 | - | ||
Review of the state of the art on SPR Sensor for DNA Hybridization at 633 nm Wavelength.
| References | Configuration | Performance Parameters | Conclusion | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S (°/RIU) | D.A. | Q.F. (RIU−1) | FOM | |||
| M. S. Rahman et al. 2018 [ | Prism + Au + WS2+ Graphene + Sensing Layer. | 95.71 | 1.763 | 25.19 | - | The sensor is capable of differentiating between the complementary and single-base mismatched DNA. |
| S. Pal et al.2018 [ | Prism + Au + BP + Graphene + Sensing Layer | 125 | 0.95 | 13.62 | - | The sensor can work efficiently to detect the hybridization of DNA. |
| B. Meshgi-nqalamet al.2018 [ | Prism + Chromium + Au + BP + TDMC Material + Sensing Layer | 187.22 | 0.10 | - | 18.72 | Ten layers of SPR Structure BP/monolayer WS2 provides aimprovedS and FOM. |
| Y. Vasimalla et al. 2020 [ | Prism + Ag + BP + Graphene + Sensing Layer | 91.54 | 3.61 | 54.81 | 54.78 | The sensor can efficiently detect the DNA hybridization with high-performance parameters such as S, D.A., Q.F., and FOM. |
| Prism + Ag + Si + BP + Graphene + Affinity + Sensing Layer | 53.08 | 69 | 1061.6 | 554.58 | ||
Figure 10(a) The canonical structure of optical fiber-based SPR. (b) SPR resonance peak of optical fiber based SPR by employing wavelength interrogation.
Figure 11Side polished view of the Fiber-based SPR Sensor.
Figure 12Fiber Optic-based SPR micro-sensor ([14], Figure 3).
Figure 13(a) Schematic representation of a waveguide SPR sensor incorporating a buffer layer. (b) The below picture depicts the several precincts of the sensor and the relevant field portraits (This figure copied from the Elsevier, Type of use: Reuse in journal/magazine, License number: 4892281394552, License date: 19/08/2020, licensed content publisher: Elsevier, Ref. [85], Figure 1).
Figure 14Resonance Waveguide grating SPR structure.