| Literature DB >> 33869279 |
Ming Fan1, Hang Chen1, Chao You2, Li Liu2, Yajia Gu2, Weijun Peng2, Xin Gao3, Lihua Li1.
Abstract
Breast tumor morphological and vascular characteristics can be changed during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The early changes in tumor heterogeneity can be quantitatively modeled by longitudinal dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), which is useful in predicting responses to NACT in breast cancer. In this retrospective analysis, 114 female patients with unilateral unifocal primary breast cancer who received NACT were included in a development (n = 61) dataset and a testing dataset (n = 53). DCE-MRI was performed for each patient before and after treatment (two cycles of NACT) to generate baseline and early follow-up images, respectively. Feature-level changes (delta) of the entire tumor were evaluated by calculating the relative net feature change (deltaRAD) between baseline and follow-up images. The voxel-level change inside the tumor was evaluated, which yielded a Jacobian map by registering the follow-up image to the baseline image. Clinical information and the radiomic features were fused to enhance the predictive performance. The area under the curve (AUC) values were assessed to evaluate the prediction performance. Predictive models using radiomics based on pre- and post-treatment images, Jacobian maps and deltaRAD showed AUC values of 0.568, 0.767, 0.630 and 0.726, respectively. When features from these images were fused, the predictive model generated an AUC value of 0.771. After adding the molecular subtype information in the fused model, the performance was increased to an AUC of 0.809 (sensitivity of 0.826 and specificity of 0.800), which is significantly higher than that of the baseline imaging- and Jacobian map-based predictive models (p = 0.028 and 0.019, respectively). The level of tumor heterogeneity reduction (evaluated by texture feature) is higher in the NACT responders than in the nonresponders. The results suggested that changes in DCE-MRI features that reflect a reduction in tumor heterogeneity following NACT could provide early prediction of breast tumor response. The prediction was improved when the molecular subtype information was combined into the model.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; feature change; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; volumetric change
Year: 2021 PMID: 33869279 PMCID: PMC8044916 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.622219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
FIGURE 1Study framework. A Jacobian map for each tumor was derived based on aligning the post-treatment images to the preoperative ones. Radiomics were calculated using the pre- and the follow-up images, the Jacobian map and the feature changes using longitudinal images (deltaRAD).
FIGURE 2Data selection procedure.
Imaging parameters in the development and testing datasets.
| Parameter | Development dataset | Testing dataset |
|---|---|---|
| Repetition time (TR) [ms] | 4.5 | 29 |
| Echo time (TE) [ms] | 1.56 | 4.8 |
| Flip angle (FA) [°] | 10 | 90 |
| Field of view (FOV) [mm] | 360 × 360 | 360 × 360 |
| Matrix | 384 × 384 | 512 × 512 |
| Slice thickness (mm) | 2.2 | 1.48 |
| In-plane resolution (mm) | 0.9375 × 0.9375 | 0.7031 × 0.7031 |
Patient characteristics.
| All | Development set | Testing set |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 114 | 61 (54%) | 53 (46%) | |
| Age | 48 (27–79) | 49 (27–66) | 47 (29–79) | 0.407 |
| Menopausal status | 0.670 | |||
| Pre | 46 (40%) | 23 (38%) | 23 (43%) | |
| Post | 68 (60%) | 38 (62%) | 30 (57%) | |
| Family history | 0.642 | |||
| No | 87 (76%) | 45 (74%) | 42 (79%) | |
| Yes | 27 (24%) | 16 (26%) | 11 (21%) | |
| Miller Payne | 0.706 | |||
| 1 | 9 (8%) | 6 (10%) | 3 (6%) | |
| 2 | 21 (18%) | 10 (16%) | 11 (21%) | |
| 3 | 40 (35%) | 24 (40%) | 16 (30%) | |
| 4 | 10 (9%) | 5 (8%) | 5 (9%) | |
| 5 | 34 (30%) | 16 (26%) | 18 (34%) | |
| Molecular subtypes | 0.409 | |||
| Luminal A | 12 (10%) | 9 (15%) | 3 (5%) | |
| Luminal B | 58 (51%) | 30 (49%) | 28 (53%) | |
| Basal-like | 20 (18%) | 9 (15%) | 11 (21%) | |
| HER-2 | 24 (21%) | 13 (21%) | 11 (21%) |
Analysis of variance.
χ 2 test with Yates’ continuity correction.
Fisher’s exact test.
FIGURE 3Example images and distribution of mean Jacobian values in nonresponders and responders. Images from a breast cancer patient (aged 45 years old) with a low MP (nonresponder) (A) pre- and (B) post-treatment and (C) a Jacobian map of the ROI (mean Jacobian value = 0.746). Images from a breast cancer patient (aged 41 years old) with a high MP (responder) (D) pre- and (E) post-treatment and (F) a Jacobian map of the ROI (mean Jacobian value = 0.449). (G) Boxplot representing the feature distribution between nonresponders and responders.
FIGURE 4Examples feature of large dependence high gray-level emphasis (LDHGLE) in nonresponders and responders. Images from a nonresponder breast cancer patient (aged 59 years old) (A) pre- and (B) post-treatment and (C) a Jacobian map of the tumor ROI (LDHGLE = 1654). Images from a responder breast cancer patient [aged 43 years old) (D)] pre- and (E) post-treatment and (F) a Jacobian map of the tumor ROI (LDHGLE = 768). (G) Boxplot representing the feature distributions in nonresponders and responders.
FIGURE 5Feature (energy) change between baseline and early NACT images. Images from a 58 year-old woman with a deltaRAD value of 0.876 in the responders at (A) baseline and (B) early NACT. Images from a 49 year-old woman with a deltaRAD value of 0.618 in the nonresponders at (C) baseline and (D) early NACT. (E) The distribution of the change in the energy value is shown in the boxplot, in which the feature value is significantly higher in responders than in nonresponders.
FIGURE 6Images representing feature (autocorrelation) changes between pre- and post-treatment images. Images from a 47 year-old woman who responded to NACT (high MP grade) at (A) baseline (autocorrelation = 65.5) and (B) follow-up (autocorrelation = 42.3). Images from a 36 year-old woman who did not respond to NACT (low MP grade) at (C) baseline (autocorrelation = 54.0) and (D) follow-up (autocorrelation = 14.4). (E) Boxplot showing that the feature value is significantly reduced in responders (p = 0.006) but is not significantly changed in nonresponders (p = 0.241).
Performance of predictive model based on images at longitudinal times.
| Images | AUC (±SE) | SD |
| Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline image | 0.568 ± 0.155 | 0.079 | 0.028 | 0.913 | 0.367 | 0.525 | 0.846 |
| Follow-up image | 0.767 ± 0.128 | 0.065 | 0.508 | 0.565 | 0.900 | 0.813 | 0.730 |
| DeltaRAD | 0.726 ± 0.137 | 0.070 | 0.301 | 0.913 | 0.533 | 0.600 | 0.889 |
| Jacobian map | 0.630 ± 0.154 | 0.079 | 0.019 | 0.609 | 0.700 | 0.609 | 0.700 |
| Feature fusion | 0.771 ± 0.136 | 0.069 | 0.356 | 0.522 | 0.967 | 0.923 | 0.725 |
| Feature + MS | 0.809 ± 0.131 | 0.067 | — | 0.826 | 0.800 | 0.760 | 0.857 |
SE, standard error; SD, standard derivation; deltaRAD, relative net feature change between baseline and follow-up images; MS, molecular subtype. p value indicates significance of the comparison between baseline imaging- and the other image-based predictive models.
FIGURE 7ROC curves for the predictive models using longitudinal images. The ROC curves for the predictive model using deltaRAD and radiomics derived from pre- and post-treatment images, the Jacobian map and the fused imaging features are shown. The ROC curve of the predictive model combining imaging features and molecular subtype information is also shown.