| Literature DB >> 33869266 |
Yunyun Liu1, Ge Meng2,3, Qing Zhang4, Li Liu4, Hongmei Wu2, Yeqing Gu2, Shunming Zhang2, Tingjing Zhang2, Xuena Wang2, Shaomei Sun4, Ming Zhou4, Qiyu Jia4, Kun Song4, Fengling Tan1, Kaijun Niu2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Background: Previous animal and clinical studies have reported beneficial effects of garlic preparations on carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). However, no epidemiological study has yet investigated the association between dietary raw garlic consumption and cIMT in the general population. The objective of this study was investigating the association between dietary raw garlic consumption and thickened cIMT in Chinese adults.Entities:
Keywords: cross-sectional study; dietary raw garlic consumption; epidemiology; logistic regression analysis; thickened carotid intima-media thickness
Year: 2021 PMID: 33869266 PMCID: PMC8044311 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.648821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Flow diagram of the participants' selection for the study of association between raw garlic consumption frequency and thickened intima media thickness.
General characteristics of 4,329 Chinese adults according to the frequency of garlic consumption, the Tianjin Chronic Low-grade Systemic Inflammation and Health Cohort Study 2015–2017.
| No. of participants | 1,073 | 1,534 | 1,032 | 690 | - |
| Sex (male, %) | 42.7 | 57.6 | 62.9 | 61.2 | <0.0001 |
| Age (years) | 48.5 (47.9, 49.1) | 48.8 (48.3, 49.4) | 50.9 (50.2, 51.5) | 51.5 (50.7, 52.4) | <0.0001 |
| BMI | 24.5 (24.3, 24.7) | 25.2 (25, 25.3) | 25.6 (25.4, 25.8) | 25.4 (25.2, 25.7) | <0.0001 |
| WC | 83.5 (82.9, 84.1) | 85.9 (85.3, 86.4) | 87.6 (87.0, 88.3) | 87.1 (86.3, 87.8) | <0.0001 |
| TC | 192.5 (190.6, 194.8) | 193.7 (191.8, 195.2) | 194.1 (191.8, 196.0) | 194.5 (191.8,197.2) | 0.42 |
| TG | 112.5 (109.0, 117.0) | 124.0 (120.5, 127.6) | 132.0 (126.7, 136.4) | 126.7 (121.4, 132.0) | <0.0001 |
| LDL-C | 112.5 (110.6, 114.8) | 112.9 (111.3, 114.4) | 113.3 (111.0, 115.2) | 114.0 (111.7, 116.8) | 0.76 |
| HDL-C | 51.8 (51.0, 53.0) | 50.3 (49.5, 51.0) | 49.1 (48.3, 49.9) | 49.9 (48.7, 51.0) | <0.0001 |
| SBP | 121.5 (120.49, 122.51) | 122.3 (121.5, 123.2) | 125.2 (124.2, 126.3) | 126.5 (125.2, 127.8) | <0.0001 |
| DBP | 76.6 (75.9, 77.3) | 77.9 (77.3, 78.5) | 79.9 (79.2, 80.6) | 79.9 (79.1, 80.8) | <0.0001 |
| FBG | 92.3 (91.4, 93.4) | 93.4 (92.5, 94.1) | 94.7 (93.6, 95.8) | 95.2 (94.0, 96.5) | <0.01 |
| Physical activity (METs | 9.34 (8.58, 10.2) | 9.59 (8.94, 10.3) | 12.1 (11.1, 13.2) | 12.3 (11.1, 13.7) | <0.0001 |
| Metabolic syndrome (yes, %) | 29.9 | 36.0 | 44.1 | 40.9 | <0.0001 |
| Smoking status (%) | |||||
| Smoker | 18.7 | 25.1 | 27.4 | 27.4 | <0.0001 |
| Ex-smoker | 6.77 | 7.77 | 11.4 | 10.1 | <0.001 |
| Non-smoker | 74.5 | 67.1 | 61.2 | 62.5 | <0.0001 |
| Drinker status (%) | |||||
| Everyday | 4.82 | 7.96 | 11.6 | 13.8 | <0.0001 |
| Sometime | 48.6 | 57.2 | 58.8 | 54.9 | <0.01 |
| Ex-drinker | 11.3 | 7.63 | 7.48 | 8.54 | 0.02 |
| Non-drinker | 35.3 | 27.2 | 22.2 | 22.7 | <0.0001 |
| Education level (≥ College graduate, %) | 41.2 | 52.1 | 45.6 | 41.3 | 0.59 |
| Marital status (married, %) | 95.0 | 97.7 | 98.6 | 98.4 | <0.0001 |
| Living alone (yes, %) | 8.56 | 4.93 | 4.79 | 5.01 | <0.01 |
| Employment status (%) | |||||
| Managers | 30.7 | 40.2 | 37.5 | 36.6 | 0.03 |
| Professionals | 10.8 | 13.0 | 13.0 | 12.4 | 0.29 |
| Other | 58.4 | 46.8 | 49.5 | 50.9 | <0.01 |
| Household income (≥10,000 Yuan, %) | 43.7 | 48.1 | 44.3 | 42.7 | 0.40 |
| Visiting friends (yes, %) | 62.5 | 64.4 | 68.4 | 71.8 | <0.0001 |
Analysis of variance or logistic regression analysis.
Geometric mean (95% confidence interval) (all such values).
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; METs, metabolic equivalents.
To convert mg/dL cholesterol to mmol/L, multiply mg/dL by 0.0259. To convert mmol/L cholesterol to mg/dL, multiply mmol/L by 38.7. Cholesterol of 192 mg/dL = 4.97 mmol/L.
To convert mg/dL triglycerides to mmol/L, multiply mg/dL by 0.0113. To convert mmol/L triglycerides to mg/dL, multiply mmol/L by 88.5. Triglycerides of 124 mg/dL = 1.40 mmol/L.
To convert mg/dL fasting blood glucose to mmol/L, multiply mg/dL by 0.0556. To convert mmol/L fasting blood glucose to mg/dL, multiply mmol/L by 18.0. Fasting blood glucoses of 92 mg/dL = 5.12 mmol/L.
“yes” indicated participants often visit their friends and relatives.
Dietary characteristics of 4,329 Chinese adults according to the frequency of garlic consumption, the Tianjin Chronic Low-grade Systemic Inflammation and Health Cohort Study 2015–2017.
| No. of participants | 1,073 | 1,534 | 1,032 | 690 | - |
| Total energy intake (kcal/day) | 1853.5 (1822.5, 1885.0) | 1932.3 (1905.2, 1959.7) | 2081.3 (2045.9, 2117.4) | 2167.3 (2122.2, 2213.3) | <0.0001 |
| Onion intake (g/d) | 4.69 (4.19,5.19) | 5.08 (4.66,5.49) | 7.79 (7.28,8.3) | 11.9 (11.27, 12.52) | <0.0001 |
| “Health” dietary pattern score | −0.23 (−0.29, −0.18) | −0.30 (−0.35, −0.26) | 0.12 (0.07, 0.18) | 0.85 (0.78, 0.92) | <0.0001 |
| “Sweets” dietary pattern score | −0.04 (−0.10, 0.02) | 0.02 (−0.03,0.07) | −0.02 (−0.08, 0.04) | 0.04 (−0.03, 0.12) | 0.72 |
| “Animal foods” dietary pattern score | −0.17 (−0.23, −0.11) | −0.04 (−0.09, 0.01) | 0.12 (0.06, 0.18) | 0.18 (0.11, 0.26) | <0.0001 |
Analysis of variance or logistic regression analysis.
Geometric mean (95% confidence interval) (all such values).
Multivariate adjusted odds ratios for thickened cIMT according to frequency of raw garlic consumption among Chinese adults, the Tianjin Chronic Low-grade Systemic Inflammation and Health Cohort Study.
| No. of participants | 1,073 | 1,534 | 1,032 | 690 |
| No. of thickened IMT | 237 | 309 | 250 | 196 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (reference) | 0.82 (0.65, 1.03) | 0.85 (0.67, 1.08) | 1.06 (0.82, 1.37) |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (reference) | 0.78 (0.62, 0.98) | 0.79 (0.62, 1.01) | 1.02 (0.79, 1.33) |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (reference) | 0.75 (0.60, 0.95) | 0.73 (0.57, 0.94) | 0.98 (0.74, 1.30) |
| Model 4 | 1.00 (reference) | 0.74 (0.59, 0.94) | 0.71 (0.55, 0.92) | 0.94 (0.71, 1.25) |
IMT, intima median thickness; BMI, body mass index.
Adjusted for age, sex.
Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) (all such values).
Adjusted for age, sex, BMI.
Additional adjusted for smoking status, drinking status, education level, physical activity, employment status, household income, total energy intake, marital status, metabolic syndrome, dietary patterns, and visiting friends.
Additional adjusted for onion intake.
Multivariate adjusted odds ratios for thickened cIMT according to frequency of raw garlic consumption among Chinese adults stratified by major covariates.
| Age (years) | 0.28 | ||||
| <65 | 1.00 (reference) | 0.68 (0.53, 0.88) | 0.70 (0.53, 0.93) | 0.83 (0.61, 1.13) | |
| ≥65 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.20 (0.64, 2.26) | 0.66 (0.33, 1.29) | 1.76 (0.78, 4.05) | |
| Sex | 0.67 | ||||
| Men | 1.00 (reference) | 0.69 (0.50, 0.94) | 0.63 (0.45, 0.88) | 0.91 (0.63, 1.31) | |
| Women | 1.00 (reference) | 0.84 (0.58, 1.22) | 0.80 (0.53, 1.20) | 0.89 (0.55, 1.43) | |
| Smoking status | 0.69 | ||||
| Smoker | 1.00 (reference) | 0.55 (0.33, 0.94) | 0.66 (0.38, 1.14) | 0.61 (0.33, 1.21) | |
| Ex-smoker | 1.00 (reference) | 1.01 (0.42, 2.46) | 0.70 (0.29, 1.72) | 1.09 (0.41, 2.94) | |
| Non-smoker | 1.00 (reference) | 0.85 (0.63, 1.14) | 0.76 (0.54, 1.06) | 1.10 (0.75, 1.60) | |
| Drinker status | 1.00 | ||||
| Everyday | 1.00 (reference) | 0.79 (0.33, 1.90) | 0.71 (0.29, 1.74) | 0.76 (0.30, 1.89) | |
| Sometime | 1.00 (reference) | 0.67 (0.48, 0.94) | 0.68 (0.41, 0.97) | 0.92 (0.61, 1.37) | |
| Ex-drinker | 1.00 (reference) | 1.65 (0.73, 3.78) | 0.72 (0.28, 1.80) | 1.36 (0.48, 3.81) | |
| Non-drinker | 1.00 (reference) | 0.75 (0.49, 1.16) | 0.67 (0.41, 1.09) | 0.90 (0.50, 1.61) | |
| Physical activity (METs × hour/week) | 0.38 | ||||
| ≥23 | 1.00 (reference) | 0.60 (0.45, 0.81) | 0.63 (0.46, 0.87) | 0.66 (0.45, 0.96) | |
| <23 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.19 (0.80, 1.77) | 0.93 (0.61, 1.41) | 1.63 (1.04, 2.58) | |
| Education level | 0.77 | ||||
| ≥College graduate | 1.00 (reference) | 0.92 (0.61, 1.41) | 0.99 (0.63, 1.56) | 0.82 (0.49, 1.37) | |
| < College graduate | 1.00 (reference) | 0.67 (0.50, 0.90) | 0.58 (0.42, 0.79) | 0.99 (0.70, 1.40) | |
| Household income | 0.07 | ||||
| ≥10,000 Yuan | 1.00 (reference) | 0.68 (0.46, 1.02) | 0.96 (0.63, 1.48) | 1.21 (0.75, 1.95) | |
| <10,000 Yuan | 1.00 (reference) | 0.80 (0.60, 1.08) | 0.61 (0.44, 0.84) | 0.82 (0.57, 1.18) | |
| Marital status | 0.50 | ||||
| Married | 1.00 (reference) | 0.74 (0.58, 0.94) | 0.72 (0.55, 0.92) | 0.94 (0.71, 1.25) | |
| Unmarried | 1.00 (reference) | - | - | - | |
| MS | 0.57 | ||||
| Yes | 1.00 (reference) | 0.72 (0.51, 1.02) | 0.72 (0.50, 1.03) | 0.88 (0.58, 1.35) | |
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 0.79 (0.57, 1.09) | 0.71 (0.49, 1.01) | 1.04 (0.71, 1.53) | |
BMI, body mass index; IMT, intima median thickness; METs, metabolic equivalents; MS, metabolic syndrome.
Obtained by using multivariable logistic regression model. Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, education level, physical activity, employment status, household income, total energy intake, marital status, metabolic syndrome, dietary patterns, visiting friends, and onion intake.
P for interaction was calculated using likelihood ratio test.