| Literature DB >> 33869205 |
Runze Wang1,2, Yuerong Xu3, Wei Zhang1, Yexian Fang1, Tiqun Yang4,5, Di Zeng1, Ting Wei1, Jing Liu1, Haijia Zhou1, Yan Li1, Zhan-Peng Huang4,5, Mingming Zhang1.
Abstract
High morbidity and mortality are the most typical characteristics of septic cardiomyopathy. We aimed to reveal the role of miR-22 in septic cardiomyopathy and to explore the underlying mechanisms. miR-22 cardiac-specific knockout (miR-22cKO) mice and miR-22 cardiac-specific transgenic (miR-22cOE) mice were subjected to a cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) operation, while a sham operation was used in the control group. The echocardiogram results suggested that miR-22cKO CLP mice cardiac dysfunction was alleviated. The serum LDH and CK-MB were reduced in the miR-22cKO CLP mice. As expected, there was reduced apoptosis, increased autophagy and alleviated mitochondrial dysfunction in the miR-22cKO CLP mice, while it had contrary role in the miR-22cOE group. Inhibiting miR-22 promoted autophagy by increasing the LC3II/GAPDH ratio and decreasing the p62 level. Additionally, culturing primary cardiomyocytes with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) simulated sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy in vitro. Inhibiting miR-22 promoted autophagic flux confirmed by an increased LC3II/GAPDH ratio and reduced p62 protein level under bafilomycin A1 conditions. Knocking out miR-22 may exert a cardioprotective effect on sepsis by increasing autophagy and decreasing apoptosis via sirt1. Our results revealed that targeting miR-22 may become a new strategy for septic cardiomyopathy treatment.Entities:
Keywords: apoptosis; autophagy; miR-22; septic cardiomyopathy; sirt1
Year: 2021 PMID: 33869205 PMCID: PMC8047209 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.650666
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1Knocking out miR-22 alleviates cardiac dysfunction and increases the survival rate in CLP-induced cardiomyopathy. (A) survival curves. Mortality was observed for 7 days, 12 mice of each group was used for comparison; (B) M-mode Echocardiograms representative image (n = 6); (C) LVEF; (D) LVFS; (E) LVESD; (F) LVEDD; (G) serum LDH (n = 6); (H) serum CK-MB (n = 6); (I) cardiac IL-1β (n = 6); (J) cardiac IL-6 (n = 6); (K) cardiac TNFα (n = 6); (L) HE staining representative images. Scale bar = 25 μm. Data were show as mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05 vs. sham group; ‡P < 0.05 vs. CLP group; †P < 0.05 vs. miR-22cKO sham group.
FIGURE 2Knocking out miR-22 increases autophagy levels in CLP-induced cardiomyopathic myocardium and enhanced autophagic flux in vitro in the presence of LPS. (A) Representative images of myocardial mitochondria ultrastructural morphology underwent different treatments. (B) Quantity of autophagosomes. (C) Representative images of blots. (D) LC3-II/GAPDH ratio. (E) Relative p62 protein level ratio; (F) Relative sirt1 protein level ratio; (G) Relative Atg7 protein level ratio; Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; ‡P < 0.05 vs. CLP group; †P < 0.05 vs. miR-22cKO sham group. (H) ATP content. (I) Representative images of mitochondria in neonatal mice cardiomyocytes; Scale bar = 2 μm, 1 μm, 500 nm. (J,K) Representative images and quantitative analysis of GFP-LC3 puncta; Scale bar = 20 μm. (L–N) Relative p62 protein level ratio with or without bafilomycin A1 treatment in condition of LPS; LC3-II/GAPDH ratio with or without bafilomycin A1 treatment in condition of LPS. *P < 0.05 vs. NC group; ‡P < 0.05 vs. NC + LPS group; †P < 0.05 vs. miR-22 inhibitor group. All the experiments were repeated three times.
FIGURE 3miR-22 exerted its effect during septic cardiomyopathy by targeting sirt1. Results of luciferase report. *P < 0.05 vs. NC group in sirt1 group; †P < 0.05 vs. NC group in MUT sirt1 group. All the experiments were repeated three times.
FIGURE 4Knocking out miR-22 reduces the apoptotic index of the myocardium after CLP and alleviates myocardial injury. (A) Representative images of TUNEL staining (myocardium); Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Percentage of TUNEL-positive nuclei. (C) Representative Western blots. (D) Relative cleaved-caspase9 protein level ratio. (E) Relative cleaved-caspase3 protein level ratio. (F) Relative BAX protein level ratio. (G) Relative Bcl-2 protein level ratio. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05 vs. sham group; ‡P < 0.05 vs. CLP group; †P < 0.05 vs. miR-22cKO sham group. (G) Representative images of TUNEL staining; Scale bar = 25 μm; (H) Percentage of TUNEL-positive nuclei. ∗P < 0.05 vs. NC group; ‡P < 0.05 vs. NC + LPS group; †P < 0.05 vs. miR-22 inhibitor group. All the experiments were repeated three times.
FIGURE 5Overexpressing miR-22 aggravates cardiac function and reduces the survival rate in CLP-induced cardiomyopathy. (A) Survival curves. Mortality was observed for 7 days, 12 mice of each group was used for comparison. (B) Representative images of M-mode Echocardiograms (n = 6); (C) LVEF; (D) LVFS; (E) LVESD; (F) LVEDD; (G) serum LDH (n = 6); (H) serum CK-MB (n = 6); (I) cardiac IL-1β (n = 6); (J) cardiac IL-6 (n = 6); (K) cardiac TNFα (n = 6); (L) HE staining representative images. Scale bar = 25 μm. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM.∗P < 0.05 vs. sham group; ‡P < 0.05 vs. CLP group; †P < 0.05 vs. miR-22cOE sham group. All the experiments were repeated three times.
FIGURE 6Overexpressing miR-22 reduces autophagy levels in CLP-induced cardiomyopathic myocardium and inhibits autophagic flux in vitro in the presence of LPS. (A) Representative images of myocardial mitochondria ultrastructural morphology that underwent different treatments. (B) Quantity of autophagosomes. (C) Representative images of blots. (D) LC3-II/GAPDH ratio. (E) Relative p62 protein level ratio. (F) Relative sirt1 protein level ratio. (G) Relative Atg7 protein level ratio; Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05 vs. sham group; ‡P < 0.05 vs. CLP group; †P < 0.05 vs. miR-22cOE sham group. (H) ATP content (n = 6). (I,J) Representative images and quantitative analysis of GFP-LC3 puncta; Scale bar = 20 μm. (K) Representative images of mitochondria in neonatal mice cardiomyocytes. (L–N) Relative p62 protein level ratio with or without bafilomycin A1 treatment in condition of LPS; LC3-II/GAPDH ratio with or without bafilomycin A1 treatment in condition of LPS. ∗P < 0.05 vs. NC group; ‡P < 0.05 vs. NC + LPS group; †P < 0.05 vs. miR-22 mimic group. All the experiments were repeated three times.
FIGURE 7(A) Representative images of TUNEL staining (myocardium); Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Percentage of TUNEL-positive nuclei. (C) Representative Western blots. (D) Relative cleaved-caspase9 protein level ratio. (E) Relative cleaved-caspase3 protein level ratio. (F) Relative BAX protein level ratio. (G) Relative Bcl-2 protein level ratio; Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05 vs. sham group; ‡P < 0.05 vs. CLP group; †P < 0.05 vs. miR-22cOE sham group. (H) Representative TUNEL staining images; Scale bar = 50 μm. (I) Percentage of TUNEL-positive nuclei. ∗P < 0.05 vs. NC group; ‡P < 0.05 vs. NC + LPS group; †P < 0.05 vs. miR-22 mimic group. All the experiments were repeated three times.
FIGURE 8The possible mechanisms involved in the effects of miR-22 in septic cardiomyopathy.