| Literature DB >> 33868990 |
Tao Zhang1, Yingli Nie2, Jian Gu1, Kailin Cai3, Xiangdong Chen1, Huili Li3, Jiliang Wang3.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of tumor-associated deaths worldwide. Despite great progress in early diagnosis and multidisciplinary tumor management, the long-term prognosis of HCC remains poor. Currently, metabolic reprogramming during tumor development is widely observed to support rapid growth and proliferation of cancer cells, and several metabolic targets that could be used as cancer biomarkers have been identified. The liver and mitochondria are the two centers of human metabolism at the whole organism and cellular levels, respectively. Thus, identification of prognostic biomarkers based on mitochondrial-related genes (Mito-RGs)-the coding-genes of proteins located in the mitochondria-that reflect metabolic changes associated with HCC could lead to better interventions for HCC patients. In the present study, we used HCC data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to construct a classifier containing 10 Mito-RGs (ACOT7, ADPRHL2, ATAD3A, BSG, FAM72A, PDK3, PDSS1, RAD51C, TOMM34, and TRMU) for predicting the prognosis of HCC by using 10-fold Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operation (LASSO) cross-validation Cox regression. Based on the risk score calculated by the classifier, the samples were divided into high- and low-risk groups. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), gene set variation analysis (GSVA), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), and consensus clusterPlus algorithms were used to identify metabolic pathways that were significantly different between the high- and low-risk groups. We further investigated the relationship between metabolic status and infiltration of immune cells into HCC tumor samples by using the Cell-type Identification By Estimating Relative Subsets Of RNA Transcripts (CIBERSORT) algorithm combined with the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) database. Our results showed that the classifier based on Mito-RGs could act as an independent biomarker for predicting survival of HCC patients. Repression of primary bile acid biosynthesis plays a vital role in the development and poor prognosis of HCC, which provides a potential approach to treatment. Our study revealed cross-talk between bile acid and infiltration of tumors by immune cells, which may provide novel insight into immunotherapy of HCC. Furthermore, our research may provide a novel method for HCC metabolic therapy based on modulation of mitochondrial function.Entities:
Keywords: bile acid; hepatocellular carcinoma; mitochondria; prognosis; tumor microenvironment
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868990 PMCID: PMC8047479 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.587479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Flowchart of the construction of the Mito-RGs-based prognostic classifier. Mito-RGs, mitochondrial-related genes; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; WGCNA, weighted gene co-expression network analysis; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; LASSO, The least absolute shrinkage and selection operation; GSVA, Gene set variation analysis; GSEA, Gene set enrichment analysis.
Figure 2WGCNA network and module detection. (A) Selection of the soft-thresholding powers. Power 8 was chosen because the fitted index curve flattened out upon reaching a high value (>0.9). (B) Cluster dendrogram and module assignment for modules from WGCNA. The colored horizontal bar represents the modules. (C) Correlation matrix for Eigengene values and clinical features. Each cell includes the corresponding correlations and the p-values.
Figure 3Construction of Mito-RGs-based prognostic classifier. (A) Results of the LASSO Cox regression suggested that all 10 genes were essential for the classifier. (B) Expression levels of all 10 genes of the classifier in the high- and low-risk groups from the training, validation, and total cohorts. (C) Expression of the 10 genes in the classifier between HCC (T) and normal liver tissues (N) in GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/) based on the TCGA and GTEx databases. *P < 0.05. (D) Correlation between the 10 genes in the classifier and the clinical features of HCC. RS, risk score.
The mitochondrial-related genes in the prognostic classifier associated with HCC in the TCGA data set.
| Symbol | Univariate Cox regression analysis | LASSO Coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P-value | ||
| ACOT7 | 34.213 | 6.863–170.547 | 0.000 | 0.562 |
| ADPRHL2 | 293.836 | 41.093–2101.042 | 0.000 | 0.767 |
| ATAD3A | 51.854 | 9.832–273.46 | 0.000 | 0.211 |
| BSG | 60.209 | 8.929–405.992 | 0.000 | 1.226 |
| FAM72A | 2.484 | 1.521–4.056 | 0.000 | 0.369 |
| PDK3 | 4.825 | 2.099–11.092 | 0.000 | 0.202 |
| PDSS1 | 22.868 | 6.255–83.603 | 0.000 | 0.419 |
| RAD51C | 16.936 | 3.992–71.847 | 0.000 | 0.128 |
| TOMM34 | 61.837 | 8.836–432.757 | 0.000 | 0.028 |
| TRMU | 38.376 | 7.287–202.108 | 0.000 | 1.033 |
Correlations between risk score of the mitochondrial-related genes-based classifier with clinicopathological characteristics in the training cohort, validation cohort, and total cohort.
| Parameters | Training cohort | Validation cohort | Total cohort | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High risk | Low risk | χ2 | P | High risk | Low risk | χ2 |
| High risk | Low risk | χ2 |
| |
| Age (y) | 0.908 | 0.341 | 0.088 | 0.766 | 0.958 | 0.439 | ||||||
| <60 | 49 | 42 | 38 | 40 | 89 | 82 | ||||||
| >60 | 45 | 51 | 55 | 53 | 98 | 106 | ||||||
| Gender | 0.014 | 0.905 | 1.328 | 0.249 | 0.990 | 0.320 | ||||||
| Male | 68 | 68 | 55 | 62 | 122 | 131 | ||||||
| Female | 26 | 25 | 39 | 31 | 65 | 56 | ||||||
| Child-Pugh grade | 0.514 | 0.473 | 0.729 | 0.393 | ||||||||
| A | 33 | 56 | 62 | 68 | 92 | 127 | 0.010 | 0.921 | ||||
| B and C | 4 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 13 | ||||||
| BMI | 0.625 | 0.429 | 6.798 |
| 5.822 |
| ||||||
| ≥28 | 60 | 54 | 79 | 63 | 151 | 130 | ||||||
| ≥28 | 22 | 26 | 15 | 30 | 37 | 57 | ||||||
| Histologic grade | 14.321 |
| 10.957 |
| 13.755 |
| ||||||
| 1–2 | 61 | 81 | 34 | 57 | 99 | 134 | ||||||
| 3–4 | 32 | 10 | 58 | 36 | 85 | 51 | ||||||
| pT | 6.376 |
| 0.097 | 0.756 | 4.779 |
| ||||||
| 1–2 | 60 | 73 | 72 | 73 | 131 | 147 | ||||||
| 3–4 | 34 | 17 | 22 | 20 | 56 | 37 | ||||||
| pN | 0.003 | 0.956 | 2.026 | 0.155 | 4.047 |
| ||||||
| 0 | 52 | 48 | 76 | 78 | 125 | 129 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | ||||||
| pM | – | – | 0.944 | 0.331 | 0.953 | 0.329 | ||||||
| 0 | 57 | 56 | 77 | 78 | 133 | 135 | ||||||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
| Tumor stage | 5.176 |
| 0.773 | 0.392 | 6.925 |
| ||||||
| 1–2 | 53 | 66 | 68 | 73 | 119 | 141 | ||||||
| 3–4 | 29 | 16 | 25 | 20 | 55 | 35 | ||||||
Bold values are statistically significant.
Figure 4The prognostic value of the Mito-RGs-based classifier. The distribution of patients’ risk scores, survival states of the patients in the high- and low-risk groups from the training (A), validation (B), and total (C) cohorts. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of overall survival between the high- and low-risk patients from the training (D), validation (E), and total (F) cohorts.
Figure 5The time-dependent ROC for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival predictions for the classifier in comparison with clinical features in the training, validation, and total cohorts of HCC.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of clinicopathologic factors for overall survival in HCC from the TCGA database.
| Items | Training cohort | Validation cohort | Total cohort | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate Cox | Multivariate Cox | Univariate Cox | Multivariate Cox | Univariate Cox | Multivariate Cox | |||||||
| HR | P | HR | P | HR | P | HR | P | HR | P | HR | P | |
| Gender | 1.313 | 0.315 | 1.319 | 0.269 | 1.260 | 0.201 | ||||||
| Age | 1.015 | 0.125 | 1.012 | 0.245 | 1.012 | 0.091 | ||||||
| Child grade | 1.335 | 0.619 | 1.768 | 0.141 | 1.543 | 0.157 | ||||||
| BMI | 0.963 | 0.145 | 1.027 | 0.123 | 1.000 | 0.998 | ||||||
| Histologic grade | 1.041 | 0.834 | 1.276 | 0.158 | 1.104 | 0.410 | ||||||
| pT | 2.091 |
| 2.809 | 0.127 | 1.358 |
| 1.227 | 0.662 | 1.683 |
| 1.655 | 0.213 |
| pN | 4.473 | 0.144 | 1.274 | 0.811 | 2.029 | 0.324 | ||||||
| pM | – | – | 4.190 |
| 2.777 | 0.151 | 4.077 |
| 2.131 | 0.254 | ||
| Tumor stage | 2.158 |
| 0.612 | 0.495 | 1.363 |
| 1.019 | 0.968 | 1.638 |
| 0.955 | 0.913 |
| Risk score | 6.681 |
| 4.544 |
| 2.390 |
| 2.106 |
| 3.941 |
| 3.218 |
|
Bold values are statistically significant.
Figure 6Comparison and validation of the prognostic value of the Mito-RG-based classifier. (A) The time-dependent ROC for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival predictions for the classifier in comparison with other classifiers. (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival between high and low-risk patients from ICGC cohorts. (C) The time-dependent ROC for 1- and 3-year overall survival predictions for the classifier in ICGC cohorts.
Figure 7Changes in primary bile acid metabolic processes between high- and low-risk HCC. (A) The primary bile acid biosynthesis pathway was significantly enriched in low-risk HCC as revealed by GSEA analysis. (B) Top 5 downregulated genes of the primary bile acid biosynthesis pathway in high-risk HCC samples. (C) The primary bile acid biosynthesis pathway was significantly downregulated in high-risk HCC compared with low-risk HCC and normal liver tissues as revealed by GSVA analysis. ***P < 0.001 vs normal group; ### P < 0.001 vs Low risk score. (D) The primary bile acid biosynthesis pathway was significantly downregulated in stage III+IV compared with stage II and stage I HCC as revealed by GSVA analysis. (E) The levels of bilirubin between low- and high-risk HCC. (F) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of the prognostic value of altered metabolic pathways in HCC. GSVA score = 0 was set as the threshold value. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs stage I.
Figure 8Metabolic subgroup of HCC based on primary bile acid biosynthesis. (A) Dot plot for two distinct clusters identified by t-SNE. (B) Heat map for two distinct clusters identified by consensus clustering solution. (C) Venn plot for identifying common samples in the two clusters. (D) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for patients in two clusters. (E) The levels of bilirubin between the two clusters. *P < 0.05.
Figure 9The correlation between the bile acid biosynthesis pathway and immune cell infiltration of tumors. (A) The comparison of the fractions of immune cells between the cluster 1 and cluster 2 HCC samples. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of overall survival between high and low levels of infiltrating immune cells. (C) Volcano plot of all genes in the primary bile acid biosynthesis between cluster 1 and cluster 2. (D) The correlation between gene expression and immune cell infiltration of tumors.
| ACOT7 | acyl-CoA thioesterase 7 |
| ADPRHL2 | ADP-ribosylhydrolase like 2 |
| ATAD3A | ATPase family AAA domain containing 3A |
| AUC | area under the curve |
| BSG | basigin |
| CA | cholic acid |
| CDCA | chenodeoxycholic acid |
| CIBERSORT | cell type identification by estimating relative subsets of RNA transcripts |
| CXCL16 | C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16 |
| CYP27A1 | cytochrome P450 family 27 subfamily A member 1 |
| CYP7A1 | cytochrome P450 family 7 subfamily A member 1 |
| CYP8B1 | cytochrome P450 family 8 subfamily B member 1 |
| DEGs | differentially expressed genes |
| FAM72A | family with sequence similarity 72 member A |
| FXR | farnesoid X receptor |
| GEO | gene expression omnibus |
| GO | gene ontology |
| GSEA | gene set enrichment analysis |
| GSVA | gene set variation analysis |
| HCC | hepatocellular carcinoma |
| HR | hazard ratio |
| ICGC | International Cancer Genome Consortium |
| JAK | Janus kinase 2 |
| KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
| LASSO | least absolute shrinkage and selection operation |
| LIHC | liver hepatocellular carcinoma |
| LIRI-JP | Liver Cancer-RIKEN-Japan |
| MAPK | mitogen-activated protein kinase |
| Mito-RGs | mitochondrial-related genes |
| NES | normalized enrichment score |
| OS | overall survival |
| PDK3 | pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 3 |
| PDSS1 | decaprenyl diphosphate synthase subunit 1 |
| PI3K | phosphoinositide 3 kinase |
| PKC | protein kinase C |
| PLA2 | cytosolic phospholipase A2 |
| RAD51C | RAD51 paralog C |
| ROC | receiver operating characteristic |
| ROS | reactive oxygen species |
| SLC27A5 | solute carrier family 27 member 5 |
| STAT3 | signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 |
| TCGA | The Cancer Genome Atlas |
| TGR5 | takeda G-protein receptor 5 |
| TIMER | tumor immune estimation resource |
| TOM | topological overlap matrix |
| TOMM34 | translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 34 |
| TRMU | tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase |
| t-SNE | t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding |
| WGCNA | weighted gene coexpression network analysis |