| Literature DB >> 33868963 |
Nilton Akio Muto1, Moisés Hamoy2, David Cristian Rodrigues Lucas1, Bruno Brito Teixeira1, Adrielle Felicia Santos Almeida1, Thamires de Castro Navegantes2, Vaniza Sheila de Sousa Ferreira de Sá2, Brenda Pinto de Moraes2, João Paulo do Vale Medeiros2, Yasmin Amorim Dos Santos2, Claúdia Quintino da Rocha3, Vanessa Joia de Mello2, Hervé Rogez1.
Abstract
The biological and pharmacological properties of natural polyphenols of the extract of Euterpe oleracea stone (EEOS) are associated with the central nervous system (CNS). To investigate the sedative and myorelaxant activity of EEOS in vivo, this study aimed to present the myorelaxant and sedative effects of EEOS in Wistar rats using spontaneous locomotor activity and motor electrophysiology. A total of 108 animals were used in the following experiments: a) behavioral tests (n = 27); b) electromyographic recordings of skeletal muscle (n = 27); c) respiratory muscle activity recordings (n = 27); d) cardiac muscle activity recordings (n = 27). The behavioral characteristics were measured according to the latency time of onset, the transient loss of posture reflex and maximum muscle relaxation. Electrodes were implanted in the gastrocnemius muscle and in the tenth intercostal space for electromyographic (EMG) signal capture to record muscle contraction, and in the D2 lead for electrocardiogram acquisition. After using the 300 mg/kg dose of EEOS intraperitoneally, a myorelaxant activity exhibited a lower frequency of contractility with an amplitude pattern of low and short duration at gastrocnemius muscle and intercostal muscle, which clearly describes a myorelaxant activity and changes in cardiac activity. The present report is so far the first study to demonstrate the myorelaxant activity of this extract, indicating an alternative route for açai stone valorization and its application in pharmaceutical fields.Entities:
Keywords: ACB, abdominal-costal breathing; CNS, Central Nervous System; DMACA, p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde; DZP, diazepam; ECG; EEOS, extract of E. oleracea stone; EMG; EMG, electromyographic; EMGs, electromyographs; ESI-IT-MS, Electrospray ionization Ion-Trap Mass spectrometry; Euterpe oleracea; GABAA, γ-aminobutyric acid type A; HPLC, High Performance Liquid Chromatography; Myorelaxant; RC, Respiratory Control; RD, respiratory depression; RPR, Rhythmic and Profound Respiration; Sedative; mg CAE/g DE, milligrams of catechin equivalents per gram of dried extract; mg CE/g DE, milligrams of cyanidin equivalents per gram of dried extract; mg GAE/g DE, milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dried extract; mg MRE/g DE, miligrams of myricetin-3-O-α-l-rhamnopyranoside equivalents per gram of dried extract
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868963 PMCID: PMC8044785 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.03.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1Negative ion HPLC/ESI-IT-MS analysis of compounds present in extract of Euterpe oleracea stone.
Compounds obtained after chemical characterization of extract of Euterpe oleracea stone analyzed by HPLC-ESI-IT/MS.
| ID | Retention Time (min) | [M-H]− | MS | Compound |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3 | 683 | 341; 179 | Caffeic acid hexoxide dimer |
| 2 | 30.5 | 879 | 865; 695; 577; 407; 287 | 2-Procyanidin dimer digallate (A-type) |
| 3 | 32.0 | 577 | 425; 289 | Proanthocyanidin B2 |
| 4 | 32.0 | 1155 | 577; 425; 289 | Procyanidin tetramer |
| 5 | 32.8 | 1153 | 983; 863; 739; 575; 499; 289 | Procyanidin tetramer-B-type |
| 6 | 34.0 | 865 | 695; 577; 407; 289 | Procyanidin trimer |
| 7 | 34.3 | 579 | 289 | Cathechin dimer |
| 8 | 35.1 | 865 | 847; 695; 577; 432; 289 | Procyanidin trimer |
| 9 | 35.9 | 865 | 727; 695; 575; 287 | Procyanidin trimer |
| 10 | 36.6 | 1153 | 1027; 983; 863; 739; 576; 289 | Procyanidin tetramer-B-type |
| 11 | 36.8 | 865 | 695; 577; 289 | Procyanidin trimer |
| 12 | 38.2 | 720 | 575; 289 | Procyanidin trimer-B-type |
| 13 | 38.4 | 865 | 720; 695; 577; 287 | Procyanidin trimer-B-type |
| 14 | 39.1 | 865 | 577; 287 | Procyanidin trimer-B-type |
| 15 | 40.4 | 720 | 635; 576; 287 | Procyanidin trimer-B-type |
| 16 | 41.8 | 727 | 642; 577; 287 | Procyanidin trimer-B-type |
| 17 | 42.4 | 720 | 865; 635; 575; 287 | Procyanidin trimer-B-type |
| 18 | 46.5 | 865 | 720; 575; 289 | Procyanidin trimer |
| 19 | 47.8 | 865 | 720; 575; 289 | Procyanidin trimer |
| 20 | 48.6 | 865 | 720; 451; 289 | Procyanidin trimer |
| 21 | 50.6 | 865 | 577; 425; 289 | Procyanidin trimer |
Fragment ions.
Latency in seconds in behavioral alterations after EEOS administration at different doses for the evaluation of myorelaxation.
| Doses (mg/kg) | Decreased Motility | Myorelaxation | Deep and rhythmic breathing | Somnolence | Respiratory depression (ACB | Transient loss of posture reflex | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | 365.7 ± 27.59 | 413.7 ± 18.30 | 454.6 ± 11.52 | 501.6 ± 11.30 | 788.6 ± 90.58 | – | 3047 ± 306.1 |
| 300 | 218.4 ± 15.27 | 275.2 ± 10.59 | 312.1 ± 24.76 | 344.0 ± 23.93 | 645.0 ± 50.56 | 842.1 ± 46.39 | 4404 ± 276.0 |
| 400 | 133.0 ± 16.01 | 151.0 ± 15.94 | 176.9 ± 11.85 | 209.4 ± 20.20 | 253.9 ± 19.13 | 384.1 ± 34.70 | 8596 ± 600.2 |
| DZP (5 mg/kg i.p.) | 54.89 ± 11.16 | 104.9 ± 11.69 | – | 170.6 ± 11.42 | 333.3 ± 17.11 | 398.9 ± 16.30 | 10,959 ± 193.9 |
ACB: Abdominal-costal breathing.
Fig. 2Electromyogram (EMG) of gastrocnemius muscle contraction. Records of control animals (A), after 300 mg/kg EEOS and (B), after 5 mg/kg diazepam (DZP) (C) (n = 9).
Fig. 3Histograms comparing the accumulated amplitudes in frequencies up to 50 Hz of electromyograms (EMG) in a linear manner for the control, extract of Euterpe oleracea stone (EEOS) and diazepam (DZP) groups; averages and standard deviation of amplitudes over time (A) and power of the strongest and prolonged contraction registers (B). (***) Statistical difference for the control group; after ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05, n = 9).
Fig. 4Electromyograms of the tenth intercostal space. The intercostal muscle contraction records demonstrate the frequency of contraction in the control animals (A), after extract of Euterpe oleracea stone (EEOS) administration, which shows deep and rhythmic breathing (B), and an electromyogram of the intercostal muscle of an animal exhibiting respiratory depression (C) (B and C are sequences of observed behaviors), contraction of the intercostal muscle of the group that received DZP (D). (n = 9).
Fig. 5Respiratory rates recorded by intercostal muscle contractions in the control group (RC), animals exhibiting rhythmic and profound respiration (RPR) and respiratory depression (RD) treated by EEOS and respiratory depression treated by DZP. (***) Statistical difference for the control group; (###) Statistical difference for the RPR group, after ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (p < .05, n = 9).
Fig. 6Electrocardiographic record (ECG) of the rat lasting 5 min (A), enlarged electrocardiogram with 10-second tracing (B); Magnification of 1 s demonstrating the components of the ECG: P- wave, QRS Complex and T- wave and data evaluated during the tracing: Heart rate (BPM), QRS amplitude (mV), R-R interval (s), QRS duration (s), Q-T interval (s) and P-Q interval (s) (C).
Fig. 7Electrocardiographic record (ECG) of the rat after administration of 300 mg/kg i.p. of EEOS, traced for 5 min (A), Expansion of the record in 10 s showing variation in the amplitude of the QRS complex after using the EEOS (B), one second magnification of the trace showing the ECG components (C). Electrocardiographic record (ECG) of the rat after administration of 5 mg/kg i.p. Diazepam, lasting 5 min (D); Expansion of the record showing 10 s (E); one second magnification of the record showing the EEG deflagrations (F).
Fig. 8Comparison between the average heart rate (BPM) recorded in the control group, EEOS and DZP (A); Evaluation of the means of amplitude (mV) of the electrocardiographic records of the control, EEOS and DZP groups (B); evaluation between the means of R-R interval (s), registered in the control group, EEOS and DZP (C); evaluation of the P-Q interval means (s) of the electrocardiographic records (D); Evaluation of the mean duration of the QRS complex (s) in the electrocardiographic records (E); Evaluation of the average of Q-T intervals (s) (F). (***) Indicates statistical difference for the control; (###) indicates statistical difference for the EEOS group [ANOVA and Tukey’s test (P < 0.05, n = 9).