| Literature DB >> 33868786 |
Dan Shu1,2,3,4,5, Long Zhang1,2,3,4,5, Xuefeng Bai6, Jianhua Yu7, Peixuan Guo1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Immunotherapy has become a revolutionary subject in cancer therapy during the past few years. Immune checkpoint-targeting antibodies (Abs) could boost anticancer immune responses. However, certain protein-based immunotherapies revealed side effects and unfavorable biodistribution, so effective non-protein options with lower side effects are highly sought after. RNA's ability to form various three-dimensional configurations allows for the creation of a variety of ligands to bind different cell receptors. The rubber-like properties of RNA nanoparticles (NPs) allow for swift lodging to cancer vasculature with little accumulation in vital organs, resulting in a favorable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile and safe pharmacological parameters. Multi-specific drugs are expected to be the fourth wave of biopharmaceutical innovation. Herein, we report the development of multi-specific Ab-like RNA NPs carrying multiple ligands for immunotherapy. The stoichiometries and stereo conformations of the checkpoint-activating RNA NPs were optimized for T cell activation. When compared to mono- and bi-specific RNA NPs, the tri-specific Ab-like RNA NPs bound to the trimeric T cell receptor with the highest efficiency, showed the optimal T cell activation, and promoted the strongest anti-tumor function of immune cells. Animal trials demonstrated that the tri-specific RNA NPs inhibited cancer growth. This Ab-like RNA NP platform represents an alternative to protein Abs for tumor immunotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: 3WJ nano-scaffold; Ab-like RNA NPs; RNA nanotechnology; checkpoint; immunotherapy; multi-specific drugs
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868786 PMCID: PMC8042240 DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.03.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ther Nucleic Acids ISSN: 2162-2531 Impact factor: 8.886
Figure 1Comparison of protein Ab and Ab-like RNA NP platforms
(A) pRNA-3WJ sequence. (B) Crystal structure showing the angles of pRNA-3WJ consisting of three ssRNA strands: red, blue, and cyan. (C) AFM image of 3WJ motif with extension. (D and E) Structure of protein Ab and Ab-like RNA NPs carrying checkpoint aptamers. (F and G) Comparison of bi-specific (F) and tri-specific (G) protein Ab and Ab-like RNA NP platforms. (H) Stepwise assembly of pRNA-3WJ with checkpoint RNA aptamers assayed by 8% native PAGE in TBM buffer (89mM Tris, 200mM Boric acid, 2.5mM MgCl2).
Figure 2Analysis of bi-specific Ab-like RNA NP binding using flow cytometry
(A) Schematic diagram of bi-specific Ab-like RNA NPs. (B) Flow cytometry results confirm the dual binding function of the bi-specific Ab-like RNA NPs to both T cells and tumor cells. Binding of bi-specific 3WJ/PSMAapt/CD28apt to CD8+ T cells and LNCap tumor cells (PSMA+).
Figure 3Analysis of CD8+ T cell activation and proliferation in vitro after 3WJ/4-1BB Ab-like RNA NP treatment
(A) Evaluation of CD8+ T cells activation after 3WJ/4-1BB Ab-like RNA NP treatment via IFN-γ ELISA. (B) Evaluation of CD8+ T cell proliferation after 3WJ/4-1BB Ab-like RNA NP treatment via CFSE staining.
Figure 4Analysis of CD8+ T cell activation and proliferation in vitro after 3WJ/CD28-T Ab-like RNA NP treatment
(A) Evaluation of CD8+ T cell activation after 3WJ/CD28-T Ab-like RNA NP treatment via IFN-γ ELISA. (B) Evaluation of CD8+ T cell proliferation after 3WJ/CD28-T Ab-like RNA NP treatment via CFSE staining.
Figure 5Evaluation of tumor inhibition effect in vivo
(A) Tumor regression curve during the course of three injections. (B) Statistics of tumor weight after immunotherapy.
Figure 6Evaluation of NK cell and T cell activation in vivo via flow cytometry
Sequence for Ab-like RNA NP construction
| Name | Sequence (lowercase letters represent a 2′-fluorine modified base, underlined is 3WJ strand and italic is aptamer) |
|---|---|
| 3WJ-a | 5′- |
| 3WJ-b | 5′- |
| 3WJ-c | 5′- |
| 3WJa (b or c)-4-1BB | 5′- |
| 3WJa (b or c)-CD28 | 5′- |
| Extended 3WJa-CD28apt | 5′- |
| Extended 3WJb-PSMAapt | 5′- |
| Extended 3WJc | 5′- |