| Literature DB >> 33868761 |
Yong Yang1,2,3, Yusi Peng1,2, Chenglong Lin1,2, Li Long4, Jingying Hu5, Jun He6,7, Hui Zeng8, Zhengren Huang1, Zhi-Yuan Li4, Masaki Tanemura9, Jianlin Shi1, John R Lombardi10, Xiaoying Luo5.
Abstract
The current COVID-19 pandemic urges the extremely sensitive and prompt detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Here, we present a Human Angiotensin-converting-enzyme 2 (ACE2)-functionalized gold "virus traps" nanostructure as an extremely sensitive SERS biosensor, to selectively capture and rapidly detect S-protein expressed coronavirus, such as the current SARS-CoV-2 in the contaminated water, down to the single-virus level. Such a SERS sensor features extraordinary 106-fold virus enrichment originating from high-affinity of ACE2 with S protein as well as "virus-traps" composed of oblique gold nanoneedles, and 109-fold enhancement of Raman signals originating from multi-component SERS effects. Furthermore, the identification standard of virus signals is established by machine-learning and identification techniques, resulting in an especially low detection limit of 80 copies mL-1 for the simulated contaminated water by SARS-CoV-2 virus with complex circumstance as short as 5 min, which is of great significance for achieving real-time monitoring and early warning of coronavirus. Moreover, here-developed method can be used to establish the identification standard for future unknown coronavirus, and immediately enable extremely sensitive and rapid detection of novel virus. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40820-021-00620-8.Entities:
Keywords: Human ACE2; SARS-CoV-2; SERS; Single-virus detection; “Virus-trap” nanostructure
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868761 PMCID: PMC8042470 DOI: 10.1007/s40820-021-00620-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomicro Lett ISSN: 2150-5551
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of COVID-19 SERS sensor design and single-virus detection mechanism. a Schematic diagram of COVID-19 SERS sensor design and operation procedure. SARS-CoV-2 can be localized by “virus-traps” nanoforest composed of oblique gold-nanoneedles array (GNAs), and be captured by ACE2 anchored on amide-modified GNAs from virus-containing urines even with complex multi-proteins circumstance. Through machine-learning and identification techniques, the identification standard of virus signals are established, and utilized for virus diagnoses. b Schematic diagrams of single-virus detection by selectively capturing and trapping virus, and the multi-SERS enhancement mechanism
Fig. 2Morphology analysis of gold-nanoneedles array and SERS spectra of viral protein. a SEM images of Au nanoneedles array fabricated by Ar ions irradiation at a tilted angle of 45° on an Au film of 500 nm in thickness. b Schematics of “virus-traps” nanoforest composed of tilted gold-nanoneedles array. c Calculated intensity distribution (|E|2) at 785 nm for a tilted Au nanoneedle array with the polarization of the incident laser along the x-axis. d Structure schematics of SARS-CoV-2 (left), and SERS spectra (right) of SARS-CoV-2 S protein and nucleocapsid protein, SARS-CoV S protein, and Human ACE2 protein at 100 nM level. e Calculated static Raman spectra of 4 types of main individual amino acids Tyr, Trp, His, Phe encoded in SARS-CoV-2 S on Au cluster
Fig. 3Affinity analysis of SARS-CoV-2 S, SARS-CoV S with ACE2. a Schematic illustration of S proteins’ binding on ACE2-functionalized GNAs of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. SERS spectra of b SARS-CoV and c SARS-CoV-2 S proteins at the same concentration of 177 nM after bound to ACE2-functionalized GNAS for different binding time durations. d Intensity of detected SERS signals of SARS-CoV-2 S and SARS-CoV S after bound to ACE2-functionalized GNAs with different binding times. e Intensity of Raman bands (1027 cm−1) of SARS-CoV-2 S with different concentration detected with ACE2-functionalized GNAs by immersing in the diluted protein solution, and without ACE2-functionalized GNAs by dropping the corresponding concentration of diluted protein solution. It is worth noting that the application of dropping method is because GNAs without ACE2 modification have little affinity with SARS-CoV-2 S protein. The value marked on the line represents the number of S proteins in one Raman-focused window. η represents enrichment multiple by ACE2
Fig. 4Establishing and validating the SARS-CoV-2 virus identification standard based on machine-learning method. a SERS spectra of inactivated SARS-CoV-2, VN and VS in PBS solution and urine of healthy 8-year-old girl patient with the viral load of 2200 copies/mL. Navy blue, red, black, purple and blue lines represent inactivated SARS-CoV-2, VS, VN, VS in urine and VN in urine, respectively. b Schematic of SARS-CoV-2 S localized within the 10 nm EM enhancement area, and calculated intensity distribution (|E|2) at 785 nm for an oblique Au nanoneedle’s tip. c Key features of SERS patterns to classify the urine samples infected by VS (simulated contaminated water by SARS-CoV-2 virus), VN and healthy people via PCA. d DA results to identify the urines for chronic nephritis and VS-containing chronic nephritis. The green, red, blue balls represent the standard of negative urine, the standard of VS-positive urine, the standard of VN-positive urine. The green and red stars represent identified negative urine and identified VS-positive urine. e DA results to identify VS and VN virus mixed in the adult’s urine (2200 copies mL−1). The green, red, blue balls represent the standard of VS-negative urine, the standard of VS-positive urine, the standard of VN-positive urine. The red star represents identified VS-positive urine. f SERS mapping (40 × 30 μm2) of 300 measuring area for one urine sample, 42 dot-measuring-area can be identified as VS-positive
DA results to identify VS-containing adult urines, VS-containing chronic nephritis’s urines, and Very-low-titer VS-containing adult urines
| Samples | Number of samples | Viral load | Identification results | Detection rate (%) | Figures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic nephritis urine | 100 | 0 | 100 (−) | 100 | Figure |
| VS-containing chorionic nephritis urine | 100 | 2200 | 100 (+) | 100 | Figure |
| VS-containing adult urine | 6 | 2200 | 6 (+) | 100 | Fig. S10 |
| VS-containing chronic nephritis urine | 6 | 2200 | 6 (+) | 100 | Fig. S10 |
| VS-containing adult urine | 9 | 220 | 5 (−) 4 (+) | 44.4 | Fig. S10 |
| VS and VN mixed urine | 100 | 2200 | 100(+) | 100 | Figure |
| VS-containing adult urine | 1 | 80 | 1(+) | 100.0 | Figures |