| Literature DB >> 33868260 |
Martti Laan1, Ahto Salumets1,2, Annabel Klein1, Kerli Reintamm1, Rudolf Bichele1, Hedi Peterson2, Pärt Peterson1.
Abstract
While there is convincing evidence on the role of Aire-positive medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTEC) in the induction of central tolerance, the nature and function of post-Aire mTECs and Hassall's corpuscles have remained enigmatic. Here we summarize the existing data on these late stages of mTEC differentiation with special focus on their potential to contribute to central tolerance induction by triggering the unique pro-inflammatory microenvironment in the thymus. In order to complement the existing evidence that has been obtained from mouse models, we performed proteomic analysis on microdissected samples from human thymic medullary areas at different differentiation stages. The analysis confirms that at the post-Aire stages, the mTECs lose their nuclei but maintain machinery required for translation and exocytosis and also upregulate proteins specific to keratinocyte differentiation and cornification. In addition, at the late stages of differentiation, the human mTECs display a distinct pro-inflammatory signature, including upregulation of the potent endogenous TLR4 agonist S100A8/S100A9. Collectively, the study suggests a novel mechanism by which the post-Aire mTECs and Hassall's corpuscles contribute to the thymic microenvironment with potential cues on the induction of central tolerance.Entities:
Keywords: AIRE; Hassall’s corpuscles; S100A8; S100A9; TLR4 – Toll-like receptor 4; central tolerance; medullary thymic epithelial cells; thymus
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868260 PMCID: PMC8050345 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.635569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Results of the differential analysis. (A) Volcano plots of differential analysis. The x- and y-axis of the volcano plot show log2 of fold change (FC) and negative log10 of p-values respectively. There are altogether 6 volcano plots for each groupwise comparison shown in the title of the plot. The first source material name in the title always corresponds to the reference group and thus positive log2 FC indicates an increase in the later differentiation stage compared to the earlier. Proteins with adj. p-value ≤ 0.05 are colored red, proteins with adj. p-value >0.5 and ≤ 0.1 are colored blue and a selection of them are named by their underlying genes. Only some top genes are shown by names, for full list of genes please see , . The results of functional enrichment analysis of genes with adj. p-value ≤ 0.1 are visualized by Manhattan plots (B, C) that correspond to significant gene sets in the thymus and epidermis respectively. More specifically, these plots convey information about Gene Ontology (GO) with “MF” describing the molecular functions of the gene products, “BP” the biological processes in which they are involved in and “CC” the cellular component where the gene products are located. In addition, there are molecular pathways in which gene sets are enriched in (KEGG, REAC, WP), putative transcription factor binding sites (TF), information about targeted miRNAs (MIRNA), protein complexes (CORUM, HPA) and associated human diseases (HP). For further information please see g:Profiler (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler). (D) shows further information about the selected GO terms in (B, C). Some highly significant functional terms are not included in (D) due to virtual overlap with a functional pathway with even more significant p-value.
Figure 2Similarities of protein levels between epidermis and thymus with respect to the differentiation stages and organized based on the localization or function of proteins. The log2 intensity levels (LFQ) of 22 proteins are shown in all samples. The x-axis corresponds to the source material that is denoted as differentiation stage. The differentiation stages 1, 2, 3 correspond in case of thymus to the mTEC, late mTEC, HC and in epidermis stratum basale, stratum spinosum and stratum granulosum + stratum corneum. The loess regression lines connect the values in those stages representing the change in protein levels during differentiation. Figure’s first line shows proteins that are more specific to the epidermis, the second line corresponds to the nuclear proteins, the third one to inflammation related proteins, the fourth line to the translation associated proteins and final fifth one to the collagens.