| Literature DB >> 33868224 |
Y Bu1, H Wang2, X Ma3, C Han3, X Jia3, J Zhang3, Y Liu1, Y Peng3, M Yang3, K Yu3, C Wang1.
Abstract
Objectives: The mortality rate of sepsis remains very high. Metabolomic techniques are playing increasingly important roles in diagnosis and treatment in critical care medicine. The purpose of our research was to use untargeted metabolomics to identify and analyze the common differential metabolites among patients with sepsis with differences in their 7-day prognosis and blood PD-1 expression and analyze their correlations with environmental factors.Entities:
Keywords: PD-1; differential metabolites; prognosis; sepsis; untargeted metabolomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868224 PMCID: PMC8046931 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.594270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Comparison of relevant indexes of patients between 7-day survival group and 7-day death group.
| Gender | 1.0000 | |||
| Male | 9 (75.00) | 4 (66.67) | ||
| Female | 3 (25.00) | 2 (33.33) | ||
| Age | 56.75 ± 14.03 | 58.33 ± 11.5 | −0.24 | 0.8147 |
| IFN-γ | 1.86 (1.42–3.5) | 2.12 (1.42–2.35) | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
| IL-10 | 51.21 (16.41–200.95) | 33.18 (11.56–63.8) | −0.7969 | 0.4255 |
| IL-1β | 1 (0.76–2.18) | 0.88 (0.7–0.94) | −0.4257 | 0.6704 |
| IL-2 | 1.33 (1.05–1.78) | 1.48 (1.05–1.93) | 0.4250 | 0.6708 |
| IL-6 | 80.91 (19.87–3375.5) | 53.41 (27.13–116.66) | −0.1405 | 0.8883 |
| TNF-α | 50.28 (31.08–103.66) | 24.55 (15.6–157.75) | −0.4215 | 0.6734 |
| CD3+T/PD-1 (%) | 30.45 ± 12.63 | 21.62 ± 8.18 | 1.55 | 0.1416 |
| CD4+T/PD-1 (%) | 34.07 ± 9.28 | 22.21 ± 10.14 | 2.48 | 0.0246 |
| CD8+T/PD-1 (%) | 28.26 ± 18.81 | 27.34 ± 17.25 | 0.10 | 0.9213 |
| SOFA | 6.33 ± 2.87 | 8.00 ± 2.00 | −1.27 | 0.2231 |
| APACHEII | 12.83 ± 3.56 | 17.67 ± 4.27 | −2.54 | 0.0217 |
| Procalcitonin (PCT) | 19.80 (6.11–31.99) | 4.00 (0.31–8.29) | −1.3576 | 0.1746 |
| Lactic acid (Lac) | 2.20 (1.05–6.20) | 4.20 (2.80–8.50) | 0.8902 | 0.3733 |
The t value is a statistical variable obtained by comparing two groups with two independent sample t-tests; the Z value is a statistical variable obtained by comparing the Wilcoxon rank sum test between the two groups.
Figure 1The figure shows the expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells between the 7-day death group (7TS1) and the survival group (7TS2). The expression of PD-1 in the 7-day death group was lower than that in the survival group (P < 0.05), and the difference was statistically significant. *P < 0.05.
Figure 2The multidimensional results in positive ionization mode are shown in this figure. (A,B) Are from the 7-day prognosis group; (C,D) are from the PD-1 expression group. (A) OPLS-DA score plot: the 7TS1 group vs. the 7TS2 group. (B) OPLS-DA validation plot intercepts: the 7TS1 group vs. the 7TS2 group; R2Y = (0.0, 0.897), Q2 = (0.0, −0.00113). (C) OPLS-DA score plot: the PDS1 group vs. the PDS2 group. (D) OPLS-DA validation plot intercepts: the PDS1 group vs. the PDS2 group; R2Y = (0.0, 0.8993), Q2 = (0.0, −0.0022).
Figure 3The multidimensional results in negative ionization modes are shown in this figure. (A,B) Are from the 7-day prognosis group; (C,D) are from the PD-1 expression group. (A) OPLS-DA score plot: the 7TS1 group vs. the 7TS2 group. (B) OPLS-DA validation plot intercepts: the 7TS1 group vs. the 7TS2 group; R2Y = (0.0, 0.743), Q2 = (0.0, −0.0932). (C) OPLS-DA score plot: the PDS1 group vs. the PDS2 group. (D) OPLS-DA validation plot intercepts: the PDS1 group vs. the PDS2 group; R2Y = (0.0, 0.7194), Q2 = (0.0, −0.0999).
In two ionization modes, one-dimensional, and multi-dimensional analysis results of differential metabolites from the 7-day prognosis group are shown.
| POS | 1-Pyrroline-4-hydroxy-2-carboxyl | 0.042 | 1.968 |
| Alpha-dimorphecolic acid | 0.028 | 1.526 | |
| DG (15:0/18:3 (6Z, 9Z, 12Z)/0:0) | 0.009 | 1.863 | |
| DG (15:0/18:4 (6Z, 9Z, 12Z, 15Z)/0:0) | 0.022 | 1.749 | |
| Linezolid | 0.035 | 1.709 | |
| L-Targinine | 0.027 | 2.048 | |
| Methylcysteine | 0.014 | 1.607 | |
| N2-gamma-glutamylglutamine | 0.026 | 1.708 | |
| PC (22:1 (13Z)/20:3 (8Z, 11Z, 14Z)) | 0.049 | 1.779 | |
| PC (24:1 (15Z)/14:1 (9Z)) | 0.033 | 2.112 | |
| PC (P-18:0/14:0) | 0.024 | 2.423 | |
| PC (P-18:1 (11Z)/22:4 (7Z, 10Z, 13Z, 16Z)) | 0.005 | 2.27 | |
| PC (P-18:1 (9Z)/16:0) | 0.016 | 2.329 | |
| PC (P-18:1 (9Z)/18:1 (9Z)) | 0.022 | 2.135 | |
| L-Cyclo(alanylglycyl) | 0.036 | 1.849 | |
| PC (22:4 (7Z, 10Z, 13Z, 16Z)/14:0) | 0.045 | 1.942 | |
| NEG | 2-Ethyl-2-Hydroxybutyric acid | 0.023 | 1.536 |
| 3-Hydroxycapric acid | 0.015 | 1.211 | |
| D-glutamine | 0.038 | 2.026 | |
| Glyceraldehyde | 0.047 | 1.339 | |
| L-glutamine | 0.022 | 1.784 | |
| Maslinic acid | 0.017 | 2.06 | |
| Pyroglutamic acid | 0.046 | 1.985 | |
| Isocaproic acid | 0.023 | 1.934 | |
POS, positive ionization mode; NEG, negative ionization mode; p-value, t-test p-value; VIP, VIP value of the OPLS-DA model.
In two ionization modes, one-dimensional, and multi-dimensional analysis results of differential metabolites from PD-1 expression level group are shown.
| POS | DG (18:2 (9Z, 12Z)/18:2 (9Z, 12Z)/0:0) | 0.036 | 2.067 |
| DG (22:5 (4Z, 7Z, 10Z, 13Z, 16Z)/14:0/0:0) | 0.023 | 2.353 | |
| Isolinderanolide | 0.017 | 2.335 | |
| Lactosylceramide (d18:1/16:0) | 0.043 | 2.332 | |
| PC (P-18:0/14:0) | 0.05 | 1.933 | |
| NEG | 2-ethyl-2-hydroxybutyric acid | 0.044 | 1.449 |
| 5-methoxysalicylic acid | 0.024 | 1.769 | |
| Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate | 0.019 | 1.966 | |
| Glyceraldehyde | 0.038 | 2.302 | |
| Indolelactic acid | 0.039 | 1.613 | |
| N-acetyl-a-neuraminic acid | 0.031 | 1.425 | |
| Paliperidone | 0.02 | 1.635 | |
| Ribothymidine | 0.033 | 1.63 | |
POS, positive ionization mode; NEG, negative ionization mode; p-value, t-test p-value; VIP, VIP value of the OPLS-DA model.
Figure 4The abscissa represents the sample grouping, 7TS1 and 7TS2 represent the 7-day death group and survival group, respectively, PDS1 and PDS2 represent the high PD-1 and low PD-1 expression groups, respectively, the ordinate represents the expression of the screened differential metabolites, the box plots shows 5 statistical values (minimum value, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum value, that is, 5 lines from bottom to top), and VIP > 1 and P < 0.05 are considered significant. (A) The minimum value, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum value of PC(P-18:0/14:0) from the 7TS1 and 7TS2 groups are 2.616, 2.895, 4.708, 7.931, and 11.199 and 1.890, 2.449, 2.862, 3.624, and 4.932, respectively. (B) The minimum value, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum value of PC(P-18:0/14:0) from the PDS1 and PDS2 groups are 1.890, 2.418, 2.820, 2.897, and 3.504 and 2.459, 3.295, 3.984, 6.082, and 8.547, respectively. (C) The minimum value, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum value of 2–ethyl−2–hydroxybutyric acid from the 7TS1 and 7TS2 groups are 3.627, 43.651, 106.343, 148.977, and 268.395 and 3.182, 14.009, 43.250, 57.548, and 75.833, respectively. (D) The minimum value, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum value of 2–ethyl−2–hydroxybutyric acid from the PDS1 and PDS2 groups are 3.182, 8.516, 29.533, 56.796, and 75.833 and 11.724, 47.909, 66.808, 145.877, and 268.395, respectively. (E) The minimum value, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum value of glyceraldehyde from the 7TS1 and 7TS2 groups were 1.822, 2.3044, 3.015, 4.037, and 4.879 and 1.406, 1.809, 2.070, 2.450, and 3.426, respectively. (F) The minimum value, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum value of glyceraldehyde from the PDS1 and PDS2 groups were 1.406, 1.811, 1.991, 2.381, and 2.724 and 1.634, 2.148, 3.307, 3.602, and 4.879, respectively.