| Literature DB >> 33868198 |
Charles S Cockell1, Rosa Santomartino1, Kai Finster2, Annemiek C Waajen1, Natasha Nicholson1, Claire-Marie Loudon1, Lorna J Eades3, Ralf Moeller4, Petra Rettberg4, Felix M Fuchs4,5, Rob Van Houdt6, Natalie Leys6, Ilse Coninx6, Jason Hatton7, Luca Parmitano7, Jutta Krause7, Andrea Koehler7, Nicol Caplin7, Lobke Zuijderduijn7, Alessandro Mariani8, Stefano Pellari8, Fabrizio Carubia8, Giacomo Luciani8, Michele Balsamo8, Valfredo Zolesi8, Jon Ochoa7,9, Pia Sen10, James A J Watt11, Jeannine Doswald-Winkler12, Magdalena Herová12, Bernd Rattenbacher12, Jennifer Wadsworth13, R Craig Everroad13, René Demets7.
Abstract
As humans explore and settle in space, they will need to mine elements to support industries such as manufacturing and construction. In preparation for the establishment of permanent human settlements across the Solar System, we conducted the ESA BioRock experiment on board the International Space Station to investigate whether biological mining could be accomplished under extraterrestrial gravity conditions. We tested the hypothesis that the gravity (g) level influenced the efficacy with which biomining could be achieved from basalt, an abundant material on the Moon and Mars, by quantifying bioleaching by three different microorganisms under microgravity, simulated Mars and Earth gravitational conditions. One element of interest in mining is vanadium (V), which is added to steel to fabricate high strength, corrosion-resistant structural materials for buildings, transportation, tools and other applications. The results showed that Sphingomonas desiccabilis and Bacillus subtilis enhanced the leaching of vanadium under the three gravity conditions compared to sterile controls by 184.92 to 283.22%, respectively. Gravity did not have a significant effect on mean leaching, thus showing the potential for biomining on Solar System objects with diverse gravitational conditions. Our results demonstrate the potential to use microorganisms to conduct elemental mining and other bioindustrial processes in space locations with non-1 × g gravity. These same principles apply to extraterrestrial bioremediation and elemental recycling beyond Earth.Entities:
Keywords: ISRU; Mars; biomining; bioproduction; bioremediation; space; space microbiology; vanadium
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868198 PMCID: PMC8047202 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.641387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1The BioRock Experimental Unit (EU). (A) Top-down image of four Experimental Containers (EC) containing one EU each, showing medium inflated culture chambers. (B) Rear side image of the EU showing two basalt slides inserted into the bottom of the culture chambers before closure of EU. (C) A lateral cross-section through the culture chamber showing the position of the basalt slide at the back of the chamber and the principle of medium injection and inversion of the membrane (in blue; left side closed, right side inflated with medium). A scale bar shows the size of the unit, which also applies to the images in (A) and (B). (D) ESA Astronaut Luca Parmitano inserts an EC into a KUBIK incubator on board the ISS (credit: ESA).
FIGURE 2Bioleaching and control leaching of vanadium from basalt on the International Space Station (ISS) and on Earth. Total quantities (ng) of vanadium in each of the experimental flight and ground control samples at the end of the experiment for each of the three organisms examined and sterile samples. ○ shows single measurements and the mean is given as red □. Error bars represent standard deviations. n = 3, except for sterile controls in microgravity and the ground experiment, in which n = 2 due to contamination. Data in Supplementary Table 1.
Data associated with the biomining of vanadium.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| Quantity (ng) | Comparison with control (%) | Comparison with quantity in basalt (%) x 10–4 | Percentage of total leached in cell pellet (%) | ||
| Microgravity | 19.84 ± 2.29 | 184.92 ± 75.33 | 60.61 ± 7.01 | 1.39 ± 0.51 | |
| Mars gravity | 23.45 ± 2.70 | 216.32 ± 68.43 | 71.65 ± 8.25 | 1.69 ± 0.40 | |
| Earth gravity | 21.50 ± 1.59 | 208.70 ± 55.85 | 65.70 ± 4.85 | 0.96 ± 0.23 | |
| Microgravity | 30.38 ± 3.90 | 283.22 ± 116.44 | 92.82 ± 11.91 | 0.96 ± 0.36 | |
| Mars gravity | 23.83 ± 4.78 | 219.78 ± 78.37 | 72.805 ± 14.62 | 1.86 ± 0.53 | |
| Earth gravity | 22.83 ± 2.84 | 221.59 ± 63.30 | 69.74 ± 8.66 | 1.74 ± 0.85 | |
| Microgravity | 13.19 ± 1.53 | 122.97 ± 50.10 | 40.30 ± 4.66 | 2.67 ± 1.05 | |
| Mars gravity | 11.23 ± 0.96 | 103.54 ± 31.78 | 34.30 ± 2.94 | 4.20 ± 1.73 | |
| Earth gravity | 13.21 ± 3.80 | 128.21 ± 49.47 | 40.35 ± 11.61 | 1.67 ± 0.35 | |
| Sterile ISS control | Microgravity | 10.73 ± 4.19 | − | 32.77 ± 12.80 | − |
| Mars gravity | 10.84 ± 3.19 | − | 33.12 ± 9.76 | − | |
| Earth gravity | 10.30 ± 2.65 | − | 31.47 ± 8.09 | − | |
| Ground 1 | 22.69 ± 3.72 | 194.13 ± 143.11 | 69.33 ± 11.36 | 2.46 ± 1.31 | |
| 22.81 ± 2.31 | 195.12 ± 141.63 | 69.68 ± 7.07 | 1.41 ± 0.31 | ||
| 10.26 ± 1.85 | 87.78 ± 65.04 | 31.35 ± 5.65 | 2.73 ± 1.06 | ||
| Sterile control | 11.69 ± 8.40 | − | 35.72 ± 25.67 | − |
FIGURE 3Biological enhancement of vanadium leaching on ISS. Graph showing relative quantity of vanadium leached into the culture chamber for the different gravity conditions and organisms on ISS (μ = microgravity; M = Mars gravity; E = Earth gravity). Data shown as a ratio of biology versus sterile controls. Asterisks reflect samples that are significantly different from the sterile controls (p < 0.05). ‘ns’ means not significant. Sterile control data are also shown. n = 3, except for sterile controls in microgravity in which n = 2 due to contamination.
Student’s t-test comparisons (p-values) between vanadium leaching in selected treatments.
| Microgravity (biology vs. control) | 0.047* |
| Mars gravity (biology vs. control) | 0.006* |
| Earth gravity (biology vs. control) | 0.003* |
| Microgravity biology vs. Mars gravity biology | 0.152 |
| Microgravity biology vs. Earth gravity biology | 0.361 |
| Mars gravity biology vs. Earth gravity biology | 0.341 |
| Microgravity (biology vs. control) | 0.013* |
| Mars gravity (biology vs. control) | 0.017* |
| Earth gravity (biology vs. control) | 0.005* |
| Microgravity biology vs. Mars gravity biology | 0.140 |
| Microgravity biology vs. Earth gravity biology | 0.053 |
| Mars gravity biology vs. Earth gravity biology | 0.771 |
| Microgravity (biology vs. control) | 0.394 |
| Mars gravity (biology vs. control) | 0.852 |
| Earth gravity (biology vs. control) | 0.338 |
| Microgravity biology vs. Mars gravity biology | 0.132 |
| Microgravity biology vs. Earth gravity biology | 0.995 |
| Mars gravity biology vs. Earth gravity biology | 0.431 |
| Microgravity control vs. Mars gravity control | 0.895 |
| Microgravity control vs. Earth gravity control | 0.974 |
| Mars gravity control vs. Earth gravity control | 0.833 |
| 0.126 | |
| 0.101 | |
| 0.778 | |
| 0.635 | |
| 0.994 | |
| 0.294 | |
| Ground control vs. ISS Earth gravity control | 0.793 |