| Literature DB >> 33868189 |
María Cecilia Medaura1, Miriam Guivernau2, X Moreno-Ventas3, Francesc X Prenafeta-Boldú2, Marc Viñas2.
Abstract
The concurrence of structurally complex petroleum-associated contaminants at relatively high concentrations, with diverse climatic conditions and textural sEntities:
Keywords: aged-polluted soil; fungal-bacterial interactions; high molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; indigenous hydrocarbonoclastic fungi; mycoremediation; native-fungal-bioaugmentation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868189 PMCID: PMC8044458 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.626436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon composition of the initial contaminated soil.
| Aliphatics | PAHs | ||||
| N° of C | Content (mg Kg–1) | N° of rings | Mean (mg Kg–1) | Threshold | |
| C10-C11 | 1.00 (±)2.22 | Naphtalene (NA) | 2 | N.D. | 0.10–5.00 – 50.00 |
| C12-C13 | 31.00(±)1.94 | Acenaphtylene (ACY) | 3 | N.D. | N.S. |
| C14-C15 | 654.00(±)32.00 | Acenaphtene (ACE) | 3 | N.D. | N.S. |
| C16-C17 | 2,462.00(±)83.23 | Fluorene (FLO) | 3 | N.D. | N.S. |
| C18-C19 | 1,986.00(±)51.80 | Phenanthrene (PHE) | 3 | 9.00(±)0.00 | 0.10–5.00 – 50.00 |
| C20-C21 | 1,473.00(±)58.60 | Anthracene (ANT) | 3 | N.D. | 0.10–5.00 – 50.00 |
| C22-C23 | 912.00(±)18.67 | Fluoranthene (FLT) | 4 | N.D. | N.S. |
| C24-C25 | 906.00(±)12.60 | Pyrene (PYR) | 4 | 10.41(±)1.46 | 0.10–5.00 – 50.00 |
| C26-C27 | 1,396.00(±)94.16 | Benzo(a) anthracene (BAA) | 4 | 7.36(±)0.76 | 0.10–1.00 – 10.00 |
| C28-C29 | 1,797.00(±)30.92 | Chrysene (CHR) | 4 | 14.22(±)0.76 | N.S. |
| C30-C31 | 1,571.00(±)21.07 | Benzo(b,k)fluoranthene (BF) | 5 | 6.45(±)0.68 | 0.10–1.00 – 10.00 |
| C32-C33 | 3,488.00(±)63.70 | Benzo (a)pyrene (BAP) | 5 | 17.50(±)0.42 | 0.10–1.00 – 10.00 |
| C34-C35 | 225.00(±)41.50 | Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (DBA) | 5 | N.D. | 0.10–1.00 – 10.00 |
| Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (IND) | 6 | N.D. | 0.10–1.00 – 10.00 | ||
| Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (BPL) | 6 | 23.23(±)0.22 | 0.10–1.00 – 10.00 | ||
| Total Alkanes | 2,060.00(±)104.35 | Total 3,4-rings PAHs | 40.99 | ||
| TPH C10-C35 | 16,114.00(±)1,936 | Total 5,6-rings PAHs | 47.18 | ||
Preliminary identification of the isolated fungal strains by sequencing of the ITS1-ITS2 rRNA region, and enzymatic screening of the ligninolytic activity.
| Isolated fungal strain | Accession number | Closest match in GenBank (accession no.) | Similaritya (%) | Phylogenetic groupb | Enzymatic activityc | ||
| Laccase | Polyphenol Oxidase | Mn Peroxidase | |||||
| MYEA 1 | 100 | − | − | − | |||
| MYEA 2 | 100 | + | − | ± | |||
| MYEA 3,7,9 | 99 | − | − | − | |||
| MYEA 5,6,8 PHE-MYEA 12 | 100 | + | − | ± | |||
| MYEA 4,10,11 | 100 | − | − | − | |||
| Control(+) | + | + | + | ||||
FIGURE 1TPH concentration evolution in microcosm assays along 120 days of incubation.aData are the means of three independent experiments. a,b,cSame lower-case letters indicate lack of statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between each biostimulation or bioaugmentation treatment. *Asterisk represents the occurrence of significant differences between B and BS treatments with control C (P < 0.05). Values are expressed in terms of dry weight.
FIGURE 2Alkane fractions in control soil and treatments after 120 days of incubation in microcosms experiments. Same lowercase letters indicate, between microcosms and vs. control soil, respectively, lack of statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Degradation of PAHs (%) after 120 incubation days in experimental conditions. (Mean values ± SD for three replicates). B, Bioaugmentation; BS, Biostimulation; PHE, (phenanthrene, three rings PAH); PYR, (pyrene, four rings PAH); BAA, [benzo(a) anthracene, four rings PAH]; CHR, (Chrysene, four rings PAH); BF, [benzo(b,k)fluoranthene, five rings PAH]; BAP, [benzo(a)pyrene, five rings PAH]; BP, [benzo(g,h,i)perylene, six rings PAH]. Different lower-case letters within treatments indicate the occurrence of significant differences between them (P < 0.05). Anthracene was at very low values, below the detection limit (i.e., 2 mg Kg– 1), reason why it has not been included in the figure.
FIGURE 4Microtox ecotoxicity solid phase assays of soil (EC50 values expressed as mg soil L–1) in the different treatments over 120 days of incubation. Dotted line represents EC value of clean soil (56,682 mg L–1) collected in the vicinity of polluted site. Brown bar: contaminated control soil; Orange Bar Bioaugmentation; Green Bar (Biostimulation). Different lower-case letters within treatments indicate the occurrence of significant differences between them (P < 0.05).
Time-course evolution of the most probable number (MPN) of specific microbial populations during microcosm incubations.
| Treatment | Process days | Heterotrophs (MPN ml–1)a | Aliphatic degraders (MPN g soil–1)a | PAHs degraders (MPN g soil−1)a |
| Soil | 0 | 1.26 ± 0.17 × 106 aA | 1.50 ± 0.18 × 104 aA | 1.04 ± 0.19 × 106 Aa |
| 30 | 1.30 ± 0.18 × 106 aA | 1.05 ± 0.18 × 106 bA | 1.50 ± 0.18 × 104 bA | |
| 60 | 6.30 ± 0.18 × 105 bA | 8.30 ± 0.19 × 104 aA | 6.90 ± 0.19 × 104 bA | |
| 120 | 1.20 ± 0.17 × 105 bA | 7.00 ± 0.17 × 103 cA | 6.30 ± 0.18 × 104 bA | |
| Bioaugmentation | 30 | 2.54 ± 0.19 × 108 aB | 1.50 ± 0.18 × 104 aB | 1.50 ± 0.18 × 107 aB |
| 60 | 1.84 ± 0.19 × 109 bB | 4.70 ± 0.19 × 105 bB | 5.16 ± 0.18 × 107 aB | |
| 120 | 2.9 ± 0.20 × 108 aB | 7,80 ± 0,41 × 107 cB | 7.10 ± 0.19 × 104 bA | |
| Biostimulation | 30 | 7.20 ± 0.17 × 107 aB | 1.40 ± 0.17 × 106 aB | 1.20 ± 0.17 × 105 aA |
| 60 | 6.30 ± 0.18 × 105 bA | 1.10 ± 0.17 × 106 aB | 1.80 ± 0.18 × 104 aA | |
| 120 | 6.00 ± 0.19 × 105 bA | 1.20 ± 0.18 × 105 bB | 1.30 ± 0.19 × 104 aA |
FIGURE 5DGGE profiles of bacterial 16S rDNA from microcosmos assays at 0, 30, 60, and 120 days of incubation. A standard ladder (L) has been added at both gel ends in order to check the DNA migration homogeneity. Bacterial bands have been named from B1 to B11.
Identification of excised and amplified DGGE bands (Figure 5) through nucleotide sequence BLAST to the GenBank database.
| Band | Accession number | Detection | Closest match in GenBank (accession no.) | Similarity | Classification (Phylum/Order) | ||
| CS | BS | BA | |||||
| 1 | + | + | + | 100.00 | |||
| 2 | + | + | + | Uncultured bacterium clone SPN0-300day-48 ( | 99.53 | ||
| 3 | – | + | + | 99.77 | |||
| 4 | – | + | + | 98.04 | |||
| 5 | + | + | + | Uncultured bacterium clone AMOH12 ( | 100.00 | ||
| 6 | – | – | + | Uncultured bacterium clone 16S-T6-1-H5 ( | 96.52 | ||
| 7 | – | + | + | 100.00 | |||
| 8 | – | – | + | Uncultured bacterium clone SPN2000-90day-62 ( | 99.79 | ||
| 9 | – | + | + | Uncultured bacterium clone 4-54 ( | 99.52 | ||
| 10 | – | – | + | Uncultured bacterium clone CMJG7 ( | 99.73 | ||
| 11 | + | + | + | Uncultured bacterium clone ( | 100 | ||
FIGURE 6Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) on the relative DGGE band intensity of bacterial ribotypes from microcosm samples taken at different time and with treatments, as detected from the DGGE profiles (Figure 5). Only those bands with a relative band intensity higher than 1% were considered.