| Literature DB >> 33868132 |
Angelita B Cruz1, Minsung Kim2, Hyun-Duck Kim3.
Abstract
The present study examined the attitudes of Filipino middle school students toward physical education (PE) and the associations between PE attitude and various personal and external correlates of PE. In total, 659 middle school students, aged between 12 and 19 years (M = 14.55; SD = 1.14), participated in the study. The Physical Education Attitude Scale (PEAS) was used to measure affective, cognitive, and motivational/behavioral attitudes of adolescent students toward PE. Results showed that middle school students had moderate general attitudes toward PE. Female students had more favorable attitudes toward PE when their teacher was male than female. When the teacher was female, male students were more satisfied with the PE curriculum than female students. When the teacher was male, female students were more comfortable with the PE curriculum than male students. Finally, students' PE attitude did not decrease as they got older, regardless of student sex. The findings provide a different perspective for the field and underscore the importance of not only the PE curriculum but also the student-teacher relationship. To prevent the decline in students' positive attitude and encourage positive behaviors toward PE and activities, teachers should be very considerate about their interactions with students of the same sex; school administrators (e.g., principal and PE department head), meanwhile, should focus at providing PE teachers with special training courses to enhance both their teaching and communication capabilities.Entities:
Keywords: Filipino students; MODE model; physical education; physical education attitude scale; student-teacher interaction
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868132 PMCID: PMC8044870 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658599
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Overall PE attitude and dimensions of PE scores based on student sex, teacher, sex, grade level, and physical activity outside school.
| 3.93 | 0.57 | 3.70 | 0.56 | 3.92 | 0.55 | 3.70 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 0.48 | ||
| Male students | 3.89 | 0.62 | 3.70 | 0.60 | 3.94 | 0.58 | 3.71 | 0.63 | 3.82 | 0.52 | |
| Female students | 3.96 | 0.53 | 3.70 | 0.53 | 3.91 | 0.52 | 3.69 | 0.56 | 3.83 | 0.44 | |
| 8 | 3.82 | 0.55 | 3.61 | 0.55 | 3.84 | 0.52 | 3.56 | 0.62 | 3.72 | 0.44 | |
| 9 | 3.89 | 0.53 | 3.67 | 0.53 | 3.89 | 0.53 | 3.66 | 0.56 | 3.79 | 0.45 | |
| 10 | 4.19 | 0.59 | 3.91 | 0.59 | 4.12 | 0.58 | 4.00 | 0.50 | 4.06 | 0.50 | |
| With | 3.94 | 0.54 | 3.71 | 0.54 | 3.92 | 0.54 | 3.69 | 0.58 | 3.82 | 0.46 | |
| Without | 3.89 | 0.58 | 3.64 | 0.57 | 3.92 | 0.55 | 3.68 | 0.61 | 3.79 | 0.47 | |
| Male students | Male | 3.89 | 0.60 | 3.72 | 0.61 | 3.99 | 0.56 | 3.83 | 0.57 | 3.86 | 0.52 |
| Female | 3.89 | 0.64 | 3.67 | 0.58 | 3.88 | 0.61 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.77 | 0.51 | |
| Female students | Male | 4.08 | 0.54 | 3.84 | 0.52 | 3.99 | 0.50 | 3.80 | 0.51 | 3.94 | 0.44 |
| Female | 3.87 | 0.51 | 3.60 | 0.53 | 3.85 | 0.53 | 3.61 | 0.58 | 3.74 | 0.43 | |
PE, physical education; PA, physical activity.
Hierarchical multiple regression predicting PE attitude.
| Block 1 | 0.034 | F(3,256) = 3.02 | ||
| Teacher sex | −0.001 | 0.222 | ||
| Age | 0.000 | 0.296 | ||
| PA-POS | 0.000 | 0.233 | ||
| Block 2 | 0.966 | F(4,252) = 1,493,540.89 | ||
| Teacher | 0.237 | <0.001 | ||
| Activity | 0.294 | <0.001 | ||
| Comfort | 0.324 | <0.001 | ||
| Satisfaction | 0.328 | <0.001 | ||
| Block 1 | 0.047 | F(3,338) = 5.58 | ||
| Teacher sex | 0.000 | 0.883 | ||
| Age | −0.001 | 0.215 | ||
| PA-POS | 0.001 | 0.025 | ||
| Block 2 | 0.953 | F(4,334) = 1,360,480.20 | ||
| Teacher | 0.235 | <0.001 | ||
| Activity | 0.303 | <0.001 | ||
| Comfort | 0.336 | <0.001 | ||
| Satisfaction | 0.338 | <0.001 | ||
Teacher sex: 1 = male, 2 = female; PA-POS, Physical Activity Participation Outside School: 1 = with physical activity, 2 = without physical activity; β = standardized beta coefficient; p = significance value of all predictors in the final model;
p < 0.05,
p < 0.001.